The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 23, 2011, 09:36 PM   #1
ksorange
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2010
Posts: 4
.204 Rugar Brass

I just got my first .204. Can anyone tell me if they have formed cases, using223 brass! Thanks
ksorange is offline  
Old April 23, 2011, 10:15 PM   #2
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,694
You would lose a large amount of case capacity compared to real .204 cases and your final case may not be long enough, being that it starts out about .090 shorter than a .204.

Real .204 brass is easily available. The loss of case capacity would practically neuter the round. You might as well have bought a .223 if you do that.
__________________
https://ecommercearms.com
I am the owner/operator! Ask me for custom prices!
No sales tax outside CO!
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old April 23, 2011, 10:25 PM   #3
zplinker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2011
Location: way out here
Posts: 262
When the 204 came out, brass was scarce, so we fire formed the parent case: 222 Rem. Mag. Squeeze the neck down to hold a .20 bullet, set the shoulder to a jam fit in your chamber, and viola. But now, why not buy the real thing.
zplinker is offline  
Old April 23, 2011, 11:12 PM   #4
Jim243
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2009
Location: Just off Route 66
Posts: 5,067
it is made from the 222 Rem Mag hull


Jim

Last edited by Jim243; April 23, 2011 at 11:20 PM.
Jim243 is offline  
Old April 28, 2011, 01:02 AM   #5
A_Gamehog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2009
Location: Central Oregun
Posts: 563
The 204 Ruger does not use the .223 as the parent case, it's case is from the 222 mag.

20 Pratical= .223 case sized down
20 Tactical= .223 case sized down

I recently had a quest to get a 20 cal gun and wanted the 20 Pratical, I gave up when nobody around here had a reamer or had ever done one. I now have a 204 Ruger AR-15. It shoots as good as any factory bolt gun I have if not better.

I have used Hornady, R-P, and Winchester Brass. They charge 23-25 for 50 Hornady cases, and 25-30 for 100 R-P or Winchester cases. The loads worked in the Hornady and R-P,and Winchester are able to work in each other.

R-10X and N-140 for the 32 Grain V-Max
R-10X for the 39 Sierra and 40 V-max.

I used the Dan Newberry Method. Optimal Charge Weight

http://www.optimalchargeweight.embarqspace.com/

I settled on a "Mild" load, I have shot some brass 3-4 times, and never had to trim for length yet.
A_Gamehog is offline  
Old April 28, 2011, 08:07 AM   #6
DoubleUp
Member
 
Join Date: October 28, 2010
Posts: 27
Best place to buy brass is normally Powder Valley. They are currently out of Win which does pretty well. Price listed at $23.45/100. Some 204 guys go with Norma or Nosler if they are looking for ultimate accuracy, but lots more money. I like the Win brass and don't have any problem getting excellent accuracy with it. It holds up well to mutliple loadings especially if you anneal about every 3 or 4th firing. No split necks so far with some cases having over 10 loadings.
DoubleUp is offline  
Old April 28, 2011, 08:20 AM   #7
wingman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 20, 2002
Posts: 2,108
Purchase 3 boxes of Hornady vmax 32gr or 40gr, bingo, brass.

Worked for me plus I had a standard to go by as I worked up loads for the 204. The vmax gave me .375 groups at 100 yards tough standards to beat.
wingman is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04752 seconds with 9 queries