Cert Petition in Rush v. US

zukiphile · Yesterday, 06:20 AM

https://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-con...t_Petition.pdf

The specific goal of the document is to have the US Sup Ct accept this case in which the issue is whether unregistered SBRs are protected by the 2d Am. The argument is that if lower courts aren't consistent on what an arm under the constitution is there won't be a coherent body of law protecting their possession.

It contains a survey or review of the reasoning of a lot of recent caselaw and the varying standards employed by them, covering a large area in not too many pages.

nuchie11 · Yesterday, 04:05 PM

Ah yes, the age-old legal tradition of “define it however you feel that day.” SCOTUS might need a flowchart just to figure out what counts as a toothbrush vs. an SB®

Yesterday, 06:20 AM	#1
zukiphile Senior Member Join Date: December 13, 2005 Posts: 4,576	Cert Petition in Rush v. US https://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-con...t_Petition.pdf The specific goal of the document is to have the US Sup Ct accept this case in which the issue is whether unregistered SBRs are protected by the 2d Am. The argument is that if lower courts aren't consistent on what an arm under the constitution is there won't be a coherent body of law protecting their possession. It contains a survey or review of the reasoning of a lot of recent caselaw and the varying standards employed by them, covering a large area in not too many pages. __________________ http://www.npboards.com/index.php

Yesterday, 04:05 PM	#2
nuchie11 Member Join Date: July 18, 2019 Posts: 17	Ah yes, the age-old legal tradition of “define it however you feel that day.” SCOTUS might need a flowchart just to figure out what counts as a toothbrush vs. an SB®