![]() |
|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2016
Posts: 213
|
Ruger Marlin 1894 .44 mag
What kind of accuracy are people in the real world getting from them? Thanks
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 27, 2011
Location: West Texas
Posts: 200
|
I took mine to the range but did not shoot at paper. I was with a friend and we took turns shooting at clay pigons we set on the 25 yard berm. Was busting them easily shooting offhand just for fun. Next time I will take the time to shoot and see how it groups at 50 and 100 yards. I sure like the way mine looks and handles.
Last edited by Straitshot; September 25, 2023 at 03:19 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2016
Posts: 213
|
great looking rifle!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 5,182
|
I repaired one for client a few years ago. Test fired and got 3/4" group at 25yd. I expect 3 - 4moa.
Ammo was expensive. More than $1 a round. -TL Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2010
Posts: 779
|
We have a single shot handi rifle in 44 mag. With 240 cast gas check bullets, 1 inch groups or better at 50 yards were common. I would expect that a lever gun would be similar.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Staff
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,455
|
I have a pre-cross bolt safety w/Microgroove barrel. Getting roughly 2" at 50yds using iron sights. I think there's a decent peep sight set out there somewhere that would help me out.
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language. Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,800
|
.44 mag carbines
I have posted many times about the twist rate used on the majority of .44 mag carbines from most mfgs up until just recently........1-38". My observations and experience with two vintage Ruger .44 semi's, and my Dad's M94, all so twisted, was that accuracy in those rifles was only so-so....3-4 MOA. Well with minute of whitetail and the useful range of the carbine/ctg, but not what many shooters expect from a modern firearm.
Now, MANY fellas report much better results, with their older carbines, but those three examples mentioned, that I have shot personally, with magnifying optics, were only that capable, with 240 gr bullets. I'd add that heavier bullets, the old 265gr and 300 gr jacketed bullets from Hornady, were much worse. In my gas guns, the lighter bullets, 180 and 200 gr, shot best. Revolvers in .44 mag have traditionally been twisted 1-18" and .44mag revolvers have a stellar reputation for accuracy. Ruger with with 1-20" twist in the new model 96 and 99 carbines in .44 in their limited production lifespan, basically admitting that old .44 slow twist rate could be improved upon. I read the new Marlin/Ruger carbine is twisted 1-20" and should be a good shooter with a variety of bullets. Regards peep sights, Skinner offers a couple of options, but one might have to experiment with front sight heights to get on target. A simple arrangement is the Lo-Pro, a single stem arrangement, affordable, and it screws right in to a drilled and tapped scope base hole on the receiver. Skinner also offers more elaborate arrangements as well. The 1-20" Marlin/Ruger has only been released a short while. Anything prior has to be from the much berated Marlin/Rem arrangement, or an earlier true Marlin, both twisted 1-38. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 1,475
|
Might want to investigate a tang mounted sight. Semi-traditional for lever actions and quite possibly no interference with the existing open sights.
__________________
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ All data is flawed, some just less so. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,455
|
Quote:
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language. Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2016
Posts: 213
|
It'll be interesting how these compare in accuracy to Winchester 92s and Henry's?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 26, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,776
|
I tried a Lyman tang sight on my Marlin 1894 ('93 JM .44 Mag).
It got in the way, irritated me, and it could not be left flipped up without the bolt hitting it. Correct model for the rifle, but pretty much a bad joke and waste of my time.
__________________
-Unwilling Range Officer -Unwilling Match Designer -NRL22/PRS22/PRO -Something about broccoli and carrots |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 27, 2011
Location: West Texas
Posts: 200
|
I intend to get the skinner peep sight for my Ruger/Marlin 1894. Just haven't done it yet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2008
Location: KY
Posts: 309
|
Lever guns are not "The Rifleman" accurate
News flash - lever guns are just NOT 1 MOA rifles. 2-3 MOA is more common. I'm doing well to get a 1-1/4" group at 50 yards with a scoped Remlin 1894. The 240 grain bullets need to be pushed hard to get that. WRT iron sights, the Skinner peep sights do help but I find a low power scope works best for my eyesight. two cents....
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2016
Posts: 213
|
What are reasonable expectations for the new 1894 Ruger/Marlin fir accuracy?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,476
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,210
|
2.5 - 3 MOA w/ Cast is reasonable expectation:
https://thefiringline.com/forums/sho...3&postcount=20 |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 238
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,800
|
wood & accuracy
Oh gosh Trooper, what a pretty piece of wood on the butt stock of that rifle !
Am I interpreting your pics correctly......15 yds? My latest copy of "Rifle" arrived recently, and scribe Brian Pierce has an article on the new Ruglin ( ![]() The same company's 300 gr jacketed bullet managed 1650 fps. That is a lot of thump for a handy carbine weighing a tad over 6 lbs and 3 ft in length! |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 238
|
15 yards is correct. That is about as far as I can see clearly with open sights now days
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2020
Location: Seguin Texas
Posts: 995
|
Looks like MOH to me, Minute of Hog.
I have a walnut 77/44 with a Leupold 2.5x heavy duplex shotgun scope. It will do MOH too, on paper and live targets. |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2016
Posts: 213
|
any favorite load or bullet/weight, or brand?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 30,487
|
Something to keep in mind, when shooting .44/.45 guns, a 2" group can be one
5 shot hole. ![]()
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Member
Join Date: October 31, 1998
Location: Grand Forks, ND, USA, NA
Posts: 57
|
Accuracy with Marlins can be good, eap. If you reload for them. Dont let the naysayers sway you.
As to Ruger Marlin accuracy, they havent been out long enough to get many reports. I hope they shoot as good as they look. Im holding out for a stainless laminatwd .357!! I hope they hear me! |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2018
Posts: 626
|
Great thread. I've been eyeballing a .357/.44 lever for some time. Leaned towards the Henry.
These new Ruger/Marlins are much more attractive rifles IMHO. I won't knock a Henry, but they don't have the timeless Old West look these rifles do. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|