The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 22, 2018, 02:20 PM   #1
markr6754
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2018
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 357
.300 AAC Blackout Bullet - Lapua 220gr

I'm not anticipating a big response here, but thought I'd share my latest purchase.

I just received an order of Lapua 220gr HPBT .308 SCENAR-L bullets and I am amazed at the quality of these rounds....which were the cheapest .308 bullets I could find. Delivered price is $0.28 each, including freight and NRA Round Up Contribution. I'm beginning to regret not ordering more.

Just for kicks I decided to weigh a few samples. Previous handgun bullets showed deviations from the stated weight, although all remained within SAAMI specs.

These bullets...222.0 gr. I weighed 5 random bullets, and everyone settled in on my digital scale to 220.0 gr. How is that even possible?

Anyway, kudos to Lapua for making this round, and Graf & Sons for shipping so quickly. I hope I get the other components I need for Christmas.

Hoping to hear from others that may have experience with this bullet. Obviously, I'm planning to load Subsonics (unsuppressed, as I don't have a suppressor). 8.5" .300 Blackout Pistol, so proper cycling not expected to be an issue.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Lapua 220gr HPBT.jpg (88.1 KB, 20 views)
markr6754 is offline  
Old December 22, 2018, 04:56 PM   #2
Sharkbite
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 4, 2013
Location: Western slope of Colorado
Posts: 3,822
I dont have any experience with that bullet, but ive been heqvy into the 300blk for years. I run a AAC 9” SBR and a Rem 700.

Im not sure why people run subsonics UNsuppressed. If you are going to deal with noise and earpro, why not shoot supers and get rifle ballistics
Sharkbite is offline  
Old December 23, 2018, 12:23 AM   #3
markr6754
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2018
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharkbite View Post
I dont have any experience with that bullet, but ive been heqvy into the 300blk for years. I run a AAC 9” SBR and a Rem 700.

Im not sure why people run subsonics UNsuppressed. If you are going to deal with noise and earpro, why not shoot supers and get rifle ballistics
I wish I had an answer for you about other people. As for me, I’ve had an AR for 2 months (barely). I haven’t shot any Subsonics as yet, and I haven’t had anywhere near enough time to have acquired a suppressor. But more to the point...this is an awesome bullet...AND it cost me less than any super bullet I’ve found. It wouldn’t matter to me if I couldn’t load these bullets for 2 or 3 years, but it only takes 11.5 - 12 gr of 1680 to load these to super.
Maybe I’ll just hold onto them and wait for the market to tighten, then offer them on EBay for 50 cents apiece.
markr6754 is offline  
Old December 23, 2018, 08:59 AM   #4
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
"Maybe I’ll just hold onto them and wait for the market to tighten, then offer them on EBay for 50 cents apiece."
Not w/o violating their policies.
I've loaded some 208 A-Max blems and have shot some 220 grain factory loads but my barrels perform better with 190-195 grain bullets.

"but it only takes 11.5 - 12 gr of 1680 to load these to super."
Barely and the velocity will drop below super quickly which may be a problem with a "barely stabilized" bullet's accuracy.
Mobuck is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04126 seconds with 10 queries