![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
|
Subsonic .308 loads
Hi again, got another question for the community. I've got some 150gr soft point that I got from hornady for buying their stuff, rebate program or what ever. I was doing some reading and found 2 subsonic loads for the 150gr bullet. One uses trail boss and another uses tight group. I would assume the TB to be the better powder for this application? Besides the lack of volume that the TG would have what would be the issue with using TG. Not sure why I want to try this little experiment, haven't bought a suppressor yet (YET!). Any one loading subsonic for varmint control?
__________________
Just a dude with stuff. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,743
|
Usually, you go subsonic with a heavier bullet, but no reason you can't make it happen with less powder with the lighter one. Trail Boss has very low bulk density, so it fills the case better than TG. I've seen one report of a gun that was explosively disassembled firing about 3 grains of N320 (a fairly quick pistol powder) as in detonation on the Finnish Gunwriters site. So, I avoid all loads, even of quick powders for light loads that are below about 20% fill (the N320 was at about 10% fill in the .308 case it was in).
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2013
Location: Western slope of Colorado
Posts: 3,822
|
I load a 175gn hpbt over a charge of Trailboss for my subsonic .308 load
Gun is a FN SPR with the barrel shortened to 18” and a AAC 7.62sdn6. Its just giggle quiet. I haven't zapped any prairie dogs with it yet. My suppressed 17hmr does that job too well. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,659
|
Light rifle loads will work a lot better using lead bullets. I'm assuming yours are jacketed based on the description.
5 grains of Bullseye is the traditional subsonic load for .30-06 and lead bullets. I'm not sure about jacketed. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2014
Posts: 1,967
|
I have used 5.0 to 7.0 gr. of Red Dot a lot for my low velocity rounds in the 308Win.
Good for squirrels, rabbits, and turkey. I don't shoot skunks. They don't taste all that good. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,719
|
A 150 gr bullet is too light for subsonic work. You really need to be 180-200 gr range. Barrel twist will play a large factor in determining your ideal weight. My R700 ACC-SD 20" with a 1-10" twist won't stabilize >210 gr at subsonic speeds, so I shoot mainly 180 sierra game king RN's and 190 or 200 smk's . Trail Boss is the go to standard for 308 subsonic work. You want to be at about 1020 fps .
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid" |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2014
Posts: 1,967
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,722
|
Why take a cartridge that tops 3000 fps with light bullets and load it down so low? If you want subsonic in 30 cal. there are better cartridges for that 30 cal carbine, 300 BO.
There are subsonic 9mm loads. Varmint control with 308 is 110 gr Sierra HP with H335 52.5g for 3,358 fps. Not subsonic, but exploded varmints wont care.
__________________
............ Last edited by Marco Califo; May 16, 2018 at 11:37 AM. Reason: Typo/spelling |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2013
Location: Western slope of Colorado
Posts: 3,822
|
Quote:
In that heavy rifle, shooting subsonic loads makes NO recoil. Ive used it to introduce new shooters in a ultra quiet, zero recoil setting. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,722
|
Quote:
You can drive a Ferrari in reverse. That does not mean it is a worthwhile goal. If I was to dabble in 308 subsonic it would be with 220 grain bullets, but you can do that with 300 BO.
__________________
............ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
|
thanks for all the reply's. this is a "just because I can" type project. The reason for 150 gr bullet is because of the data I found on an IMR sheet, think I got is off the hogdon site, as well as the TG load. I figured tight group would be a bad idea in .308. so far the only 2 powders I found for subsonic 308.
edit: My bad, the TG load is a 168gr projectile. Still think that one is a bad idea.
__________________
Just a dude with stuff. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2015
Location: Issaquah WA. Its a dry rain.
Posts: 1,774
|
Subs in 308 sounds fun to me. You dont need any more reason than that. As stated trail boss is great for these experiments but titegroup does infact work well, Ive loaded **GASP** 40 grain subs in 223, they worked well. Why? Cause.
Do it. Its a fun little experiment.
__________________
Just shoot the damn thing. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 30,484
|
Quote:
Quote:
Maybe its because I'm from a different era, but I fail to see the point in subsonic loads in transonic calibers. Back then, we called them "gallery loads" and often used round balls or cast bullets, and certainly never "wasted" good jacketed bullets on low speed loads. ![]() I don't get how some people are always saying how poor a manstopper ANY handgun is, yet shooting a special low power rifle round (that doesn't even match the .30 Carbine) is the greatest thing since sliced bread.... ![]() You certainly can do it, if you want, and every cartridge has a use, but compared to the greater effectiveness in the field of full power loads, or more powerful rounds, I have to wonder why bother??
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2014
Posts: 1,967
|
Quote:
A friend's son shot full power loads with his and the barrel was shot out in 4 years after purchase. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 22, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,657
|
Quote:
__________________
Cherish our flag, honor it, defend it in word and deed, or get the hell out. Our Bill of Rights has been paid for by heros in uniform and shall not be diluted by misguided governmental social experiments. We owe this to our children, anything less is cowardice. USAF FAC, 5th Spl Forces, Vietnam Vet '69-'73. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,743
|
It is all purpose-driven. Townsend Whelen used to carry more catsneeze loads than full power loads on his extended hunts, figuring to shoot many more rabbits for food than anything else. A person wanting to practice trigger control or follow-through without recoil hiding sight movement, yet still print on paper. Whelen used buckshot for rabbit projectiles, IIRC. Cast bullets are great for this, too. And now that powder coating is commonly available, you can probably even avoid the bother of cleaning out leading.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
|
As stated before it is a "just because I can" kind of thing. so can we get past the why? I have no can, I'm not doing covert wet work, my range only goes out to 200M, don't plan to hunt large body game or even rabbits... just a dude, with stuff, and this is an option for loading. I have been loading for a few years now and have wanted to try this. Why, as you have asked? because. Enough said.
so from what I've seen in the responses to this post so far, the take away might be: Cast or powder coated bullets work well. Why better than jacketed? Remember these 150's were free after buying some Hornady stuff, cost is no issue at this point. TB is a better choice. Because of case fill? too fast burn + too little powder = BOOM and or rapid firearm / face disassembly? What else am I missing?
__________________
Just a dude with stuff. Last edited by 308Loader; May 18, 2018 at 09:14 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 1999
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 1,759
|
Trail Boss, because of case fill and less worry over pressure/powder shifts. Have had good luck with it in 20 in with Lapua 200 grainers. Do not see any reason you could not try it with lighter bullets, especially with a slow twist rifle. Have not tried the smaller charges of very fast powders, and heavier bullets have more energy at same velocities.
A sub sonic suppressed 308 through 20 in barrel is very quiet, with a rainbow trajectory. And it is fun. Am not real worried what internet exspurts care why, or what for. Am getting old and like having fun. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,719
|
Why do I load subsonic ? I shoot with a suppressor. When you shoot subsonic 308 using 200 gr bullets at only 1000 fps you see and hear things you will never experience shooting traditional supersonic. When shooting heavy subs suppressed I actually hear the bullet spin vortex as it travels downrange. I see a unique silent bullet splatter as it impacts the steel gong , then I hear the loud steel gong report. It's a unique interactive gratification . That's why I bother. Don't need to explain to the question askers. If you want the answer load subsonic suppressed and try it for yourself.
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid" |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
|
so mark where the base of the bullet would be when seated, fill to the line and weigh = max. Take that weight and x .7, that is start load? the bullet I'm using has a crimp groove, so I measured the bullet from crimp grove to base. then applied that number from the case mouth down to the shoulder. the sheet I got from IMR - hodgdon says fed 210 (magnum) primers would cci br2 be too weak?
__________________
Just a dude with stuff. Last edited by 308Loader; May 20, 2018 at 10:54 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,743
|
You've got the basic idea. Your primers will be fine.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
|
Thanks. I had some 210m on hand and loaded a ladder in 1gr increments. Might be able to shoot them tomorrow. I will try the BR2 next loading.
__________________
Just a dude with stuff. |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
|
dufus, I too have a weatherby mark V, this one is chambered in 30-378. good call on the lower velocity - pressure keeping barrel up life. I don't know if I can shoot that big cartage subsonic, might be the next thing for me to try. Even if it is supersonic but not eating the thought out it might have the advantage of trigger time. Got to say, low velocity 30-378 completely defeats the purpose of owning such a rifle, but what the heck.
__________________
Just a dude with stuff. |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2014
Posts: 1,967
|
I know whatcha mean when it comes to spending that much on a rifle that can shoot the barrel out in 600 rounds.
Lots of powder going down that 30 caliber hole. Just like the 460, when you pump 110 grains of powder down the tube, things can get purty damn hot if you don't watch it. I do shoot cast bullets in it. 500 grainers mostly. They are a great deal cheaper that a jacketed bullet. |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Member
Join Date: February 27, 2017
Posts: 81
|
The draw for me to subsonic .308 WIN was that I could load with the same bullets that I use in my 300 BO subsonic, as hinted at earlier in the thread.
And with a simple spin of my elevation turret, I can go from shooting 308 subs POA/POI out to 250+ meters to shooting 308 supers out to 900 meters. My 300 BO cannot do the same with either ammo type. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|