![]() |
|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2011
Location: Western PA.
Posts: 1,630
|
Walther CCP size comparison to other pistols
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSOghImssZE
Some have been asking for a size comparison with other pistols. Here it is on video that I shot tonight in my home. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2000
Posts: 4,193
|
It would be nice if gun manufacturers would start selling concealed carry firearms WITHOUT the huge light rail on the front.
Thanks for the comparison. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
![]() OTOH at least these trigger guards don't cause drag when drawing from a tight pancake holster, like a (superfluous) accessory rail does. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2011
Location: Western PA.
Posts: 1,630
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2011
Location: Western PA.
Posts: 1,630
|
New is always good...
Quote:
Don't judge old things because someone has thought up something new, like folks who train in a machine and on a screen, such as the new Shoot or Don't Shoot machines, but have never been hit or felt a muzzle blast, or real fear where you are operating on fight or flight instincts. NEW isn't always good. Choice is good... Last edited by Spats McGee; December 29, 2014 at 02:35 PM. Reason: Inappropriate comment removed |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 6, 2011
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 4, 2008
Posts: 200
|
I prefer the squared trigger guard and shoot much better with it incorporated into my grip....to each his own.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
|
"It seems like NO well-known trainers advocate the support-hand-forward or index-finger-forward firing grip anymore, so I wonder why gunmakers still design trigger guards for this"
I believe it's mostly a German fashion; lots of makers in the States and elsewhere no longer square the guard, but H&K always seemed to make a point of doing so. My beef with the gun's look, other than the grip design that is just needlessly 'busy' to my delicate sensibilities, is that there are about a half dozen pointy corners on the thing that simply make it look like it would be uncomfortable to hold or holster. Also, that a tool is needed to strip it for cleaning. They really should have resolved that before going ahead with the release, but I'm sure "there was no alternative," or something to that effect. TCB |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
![]() I just hate the way square trigger guards look and it clouded my judgment. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. ![]() Quote:
![]() Even if one sets the whole square trigger guard issue aside, it seems to me that many aspects of the CCP design exist solely because the Walther/Umarex designers apparently thought that uncluttered smooth surfaces are somehow undesirable. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
|
I'm speaking, of course, from my experience with the R51, whose factory rounding of corners inexplicably didn't take the carry-gun world by storm. Seriously, why wouldn't you want your carry gun "slippery?" But still people clamor for tall, square slides, cheese grater serrations, and bumpy control handles. Baffling.
"the Walther/Umarex designers apparently thought that uncluttered smooth surfaces are somehow undesirable." I'm sure they were inspired by power tools. ![]() TCB |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|