The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 29, 2014, 01:01 AM   #1
WildBill45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2011
Location: Western PA.
Posts: 1,630
Walther CCP size comparison to other pistols

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSOghImssZE

Some have been asking for a size comparison with other pistols. Here it is on video that I shot tonight in my home.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CCP size sm.jpg (205.5 KB, 73 views)
WildBill45 is offline  
Old December 29, 2014, 09:04 AM   #2
Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2000
Posts: 4,193
It would be nice if gun manufacturers would start selling concealed carry firearms WITHOUT the huge light rail on the front.

Thanks for the comparison.
Pilot is offline  
Old December 29, 2014, 11:59 AM   #3
carguychris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot
It would be nice if gun manufacturers would start selling concealed carry firearms WITHOUT the huge light rail on the front.
...or a squared-off and serrated trigger guard. It seems like NO well-known trainers advocate the support-hand-forward or index-finger-forward firing grip anymore, so I wonder why gunmakers still design trigger guards for this. (Perhaps these techniques are still prevalent in Europe? )

OTOH at least these trigger guards don't cause drag when drawing from a tight pancake holster, like a (superfluous) accessory rail does.
carguychris is offline  
Old December 29, 2014, 01:06 PM   #4
WildBill45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2011
Location: Western PA.
Posts: 1,630
Quote:
It would be nice if gun manufacturers would start selling concealed carry firearms WITHOUT the huge light rail on the front.
It would be nice if they made two models so you have choice, but they go with the market which leads some astray with advertising and trainers who like new things to have something to talk about, and shooters who follow anyone on TV and do what they do....
WildBill45 is offline  
Old December 29, 2014, 01:14 PM   #5
WildBill45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2011
Location: Western PA.
Posts: 1,630
New is always good...

Quote:
It seems like NO well-known trainers advocate the support-hand-forward or index-finger-forward firing grip anymore, so I wonder why gunmakers still design trigger guards for this
Teachers teach and doers do. Some of the best shooters, martial arts folks, and others don't do what most teachers teach, they adapt and do what works! Tubs won more across the course matches than anyone else and was the first to canter his rifle, against the core of the Marine Corps training, etc. Bruce Lee completely went off track in regard to doing what past masters were training. The above things are still practiced by some of us old school folks, and for good reasons. You see trainers on TV who teach more posing and their lingo terms for it, because that is this teachers do, develop their own techniques and language to give themselves merit, some are good, some are not. Any pose that slows one down, in shooting or in martial arts is a killer. By the time you pose you are already hit or shot by your opponent but, their followers will stand in front of a mirror playing the "Imitation Games" than time at the range actually shooting!

Don't judge old things because someone has thought up something new, like folks who train in a machine and on a screen, such as the new Shoot or Don't Shoot machines, but have never been hit or felt a muzzle blast, or real fear where you are operating on fight or flight instincts. NEW isn't always good.

Choice is good...

Last edited by Spats McGee; December 29, 2014 at 02:35 PM. Reason: Inappropriate comment removed
WildBill45 is offline  
Old December 29, 2014, 08:19 PM   #6
fire4606
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 6, 2011
Posts: 216
Quote:
It seems like NO well-known trainers advocate the support-hand-forward or index-finger-forward firing grip anymore, so I wonder why gunmakers still design trigger guards for this.
Saw A video the other day where Jerry Miculek talked about how he still uses that grip on occasion with polymer framed pistols
fire4606 is offline  
Old December 30, 2014, 06:34 PM   #7
sixgunluv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2008
Posts: 200
I prefer the squared trigger guard and shoot much better with it incorporated into my grip....to each his own.
sixgunluv is offline  
Old December 31, 2014, 07:27 PM   #8
barnbwt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
"It seems like NO well-known trainers advocate the support-hand-forward or index-finger-forward firing grip anymore, so I wonder why gunmakers still design trigger guards for this"
I believe it's mostly a German fashion; lots of makers in the States and elsewhere no longer square the guard, but H&K always seemed to make a point of doing so. My beef with the gun's look, other than the grip design that is just needlessly 'busy' to my delicate sensibilities, is that there are about a half dozen pointy corners on the thing that simply make it look like it would be uncomfortable to hold or holster.

Also, that a tool is needed to strip it for cleaning. They really should have resolved that before going ahead with the release, but I'm sure "there was no alternative," or something to that effect.

TCB
barnbwt is offline  
Old January 1, 2015, 04:45 PM   #9
carguychris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBill45
Don't judge old things because someone has thought up something new, like folks who train in a machine and on a screen, such as the new Shoot or Don't Shoot machines, but have never been hit or felt a muzzle blast, or real fear where you are operating on fight or flight instincts. NEW isn't always good.
You're right. Perhaps I went a little overboard with my previous statement.

I just hate the way square trigger guards look and it clouded my judgment. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnbwt
My beef with the gun's look, other than the grip design that is just needlessly 'busy' to my delicate sensibilities, is that there are about a half dozen pointy corners on the thing that simply make it look like it would be uncomfortable to hold or holster.
+1. IMHO the Ruger LC9 exemplifies how a small concealable 9mm pistol should look, and from a styling standpoint, the CCP is the "un-LC9".

Even if one sets the whole square trigger guard issue aside, it seems to me that many aspects of the CCP design exist solely because the Walther/Umarex designers apparently thought that uncluttered smooth surfaces are somehow undesirable.
carguychris is offline  
Old January 1, 2015, 11:17 PM   #10
barnbwt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
I'm speaking, of course, from my experience with the R51, whose factory rounding of corners inexplicably didn't take the carry-gun world by storm. Seriously, why wouldn't you want your carry gun "slippery?" But still people clamor for tall, square slides, cheese grater serrations, and bumpy control handles. Baffling.

"the Walther/Umarex designers apparently thought that uncluttered smooth surfaces are somehow undesirable."
I'm sure they were inspired by power tools.

TCB
barnbwt is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04517 seconds with 10 queries