The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 11, 2013, 11:08 AM   #1
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
Better or Worse Bullet Weight for Semi? .30-06

In Remington semi auto loaders, do they tend to prefer the lighter bullet weights or heavier as a rule of thumb? For accuracy? Any reduced felt recoil from the lighter bullets? I expect there to still be plenty of knock down from any of these weights on hogs and deer...

Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old September 11, 2013, 11:11 AM   #2
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,694
Generally speaking, lighter bullets produce less recoil than heavy bullets in the same caliber. The difference is fairly minimal though.

If I wanted to reduce the recoil of a .30-06 and I was going to use it on hogs and deer, I'd sell it and get a .243.
__________________
https://ecommercearms.com
I am the owner/operator! Ask me for custom prices!
No sales tax outside CO!
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old September 11, 2013, 11:17 AM   #3
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
But .30-06 is just such a cool round

Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old September 12, 2013, 12:29 PM   #4
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
A flat-base 150-grain bullet ahead of maybe 50 grains of 4064 oughta work. It's about 5% under my max load. Or any similar load with an equivalent burn-rate powder.

I dunno. Odds are, a book's starting load with any suitable bullet would likely work for hunting anything in Florida. What counts, generally, is groups inside 1.5 MOA. That rifle would do that with Hansen (Czech-made) GI-type ammo.

Flat-based bullets hold together a bit better than boat-tails. That has to do with how they're made.

New brass or full-length resize in a semi-auto. Just don't set the shoulder back, to keep proper head-spacing.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old September 12, 2013, 08:36 PM   #5
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
Factory loads only for me... Not a reloader at all...

Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old September 12, 2013, 08:40 PM   #6
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
Got junior to fire the 742 today... Four rounds. Looks like I will be able to get it padded enuff for me to be safe...

Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old September 12, 2013, 08:46 PM   #7
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
It's been a long while since I had a 742 around but the several that I had between 1971 and 1988(all 30/06 BTW) shot 125 and 150 grain bullets slightly better than other weights of factory loads. I did shoot 180 grainers on deer for several years because they didn't waste as much meat but shots were close so a slight reduction in accuracy was inconsequential. I shot a lot of 125 grain Hornady Spire points through a couple and killed quite a few coyotes using this bullet.
The thing I remember most was that point of impact of 125/150 was nearly the same while 110 & 180 POI was about 4-5" higher.
Mobuck is offline  
Old September 12, 2013, 10:09 PM   #8
JD0x0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2013
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
I'd sell it and get a .243.
Quote:
But .30-06 is just such a cool round
How about a compromise? .25-06 or .270 win Which in case you didn't know, are the .30-06's younger siblings, which more or less, use the .30-06 case necked down to .25 cal and .277 cal, respectively.
Generally, they have less recoil and are flatter shooting than the .30-06 and they still have plenty of punch. The .270 can take the same game as the .30-06 with the right load, and they are pretty much equal on power. The .30-06 has heavier bullets, but you said yourself you wont be reloading, not that you'd need heavy bullets for the game you intend on hunting.
130 grain bullets in the .270 is more than enough for deer and hogs. You will likely get nice exit wounds, depending on bullet construction, you choose. If you don't think 130's are enough (trust me they're more than enough)
You've got 140's and 150's in factory ammo. The 150 grain bullets in .277 cal have comparable sectional densities to 185 grain bullets in .308 cal. Not that you'd need anything that heavy. I've seen ethical, DRT shots on Elk with 130's from a .270 win.
JD0x0 is offline  
Old September 13, 2013, 06:35 AM   #9
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
Don't see many Remington semiauto in 25/06. Of the failures of the Remington SA platform I've seen, all were 270. The 30/06 is the best functional wise but the 6mm Remington is a very good alternative.
Mobuck is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07815 seconds with 9 queries