![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2011
Posts: 627
|
XDm 40 compact review
I bought a Springfield XDm .40 S&W compact and thought I'd share my opinions. Sorry for lack of pictures; the Springfield site has plenty. First, the very nice kit. You get a lot:
The ergonomics, visuals and controls are excellent. The positives:
A few minor negatives:
Shooting: Sights are fixed white-dot but pusher adjustable. Mine shot true at around 8 yards. I had no failures of any kind shooting quality ammo. I found recoil and flip to be less than expected given the pistol's size, but the slide is somewhat heavy which is advantageous in this case. The trigger is short, smooth and crisp. The 11-round flush magazine is a bit short for my fat fingers and could benefit from an extended floorplate. The 16-round mag grips just fine. Cleaning: Takedown is easy when you remember to engage the grip safety. The frame lever flips UP with the slide back, but otherwise takedown is like a Beretta 92 or a Sig. Cleaning and oiling are easy as you'd expect from any modern poly striker pistol. In summary, I like this pistol much more than I expected. I expected quality but IMO the features push this pistol into the premium category. I have limited range time with it but so far I give it a full thumbs up recommendation.
__________________
Shoot smart. Shoot S-Mart. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 30, 2012
Location: The Hometown of JMB
Posts: 212
|
I own the full size with 4.5 inch barrel. I've put about 700 rounds through it, no failures/malfunctions of any kind so far. I LOVE IT! I just bought 1000 rounds for it and look forward to shooting every last one of them.
Great review, good details on what the kit includes and your thoughts on the pros and cons! |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: February 26, 2012
Location: Middle of nowhere,Wisconsin
Posts: 19
|
I almost bought one of these in a 9mm but thougt it eould be too big for iwb carry so I purchased a kahr cw9. I'm still looking for a good range gun to put thousands of round thru. Would you recomend this gun to someone for a range gun.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2011
Posts: 627
|
Agreed, it is a bit large and heavy for IWB carry, and I'm a big fella.
Yeah this gun with the extended mag/grip works well at the range tho my experience with it is limited. Off-topic but if you're looking to put a LOT of 9mm down-range you can't go wrong with a Glock 17 or 19.
__________________
Shoot smart. Shoot S-Mart. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
congrats on the new pistol I'm glad you like it. I would like to point out a couple things though
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2011
Posts: 627
|
Tahunua001, excellent corrections and dead-on. Thanks.
1) The extension sleeves are indeed different widths as you said. 2) I suppose having a mag loader handy could be, well, handy but I still think the rails are a (admittedly funny) gimmick. 3) I never understood the spent brass thing. Honest question, what does it tell LE? This (and most) gun doesn't imprint serial # on the casing or primer, so a 40 casing is a 40 casing, no? Seems it would be smarter to submit the bullet to LE for bullet/rifling imprinting...
__________________
Shoot smart. Shoot S-Mart. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
each gun makes unique makings on a casing just as much as the barrel does to the bullet. the mag lips, feed ramp, extractor, ejector, and firing pin all mark the casing.
I will agree that the 1913 rails on anything and everything is a bit of a gimmick.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2011
Posts: 627
|
Dangerously off-topic here but maybe others are interested...
I can see all the casing contact points adding up to a unique-ish "fingerprint". But wouldn't that vary widely by manufacturer and materials? I'd be genuinely interested to read about a case where such casing marks were relevant.
__________________
Shoot smart. Shoot S-Mart. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2011
Posts: 627
|
(Replying to myself)
On second thought, this whole line of reasoning is pointless ![]()
__________________
Shoot smart. Shoot S-Mart. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
it is a bit more flimsy which is why ballistic samples are more concrete since changing out a $25 magazine would alter the markings and make casings unconclusive but not everyone has a clearing tank in their man cave to take samples just in case thier guns are stolen either.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: December 28, 2008
Posts: 66
|
Love mine, and i carry it IWB with a Crossbreed supertuck, no issues doing it with that or a G36
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2010
Posts: 449
|
XDM
I just picked up a XDM 45 3.8 for a "house" gun and love it. I have the same issues= it's a little hard to slap a fully loaded mag in when there is one in the pipe and the mag release can be a little hard sometimes to eject a mag. I expect these issues will get better when she is broken in.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 13, 2010
Location: Montana
Posts: 135
|
The XDM does get better when broken in..
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|