The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 4, 2007, 08:13 PM   #1
JED1177
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Posts: 238
Colt "Last Ditch" Agent



I have one of the Agents with the dull finish produced in the strike days. Although I have more than a few carry pieces to pick from, the Agent is my choice.

No fear of scratching the finish, never rusts (don't know why, part of it is steel) shoots to the point of aim etc. Just an excellent gun.

My question is this, I have read at length abour cylinder endshake. I got out the feeler gauges and with the cylinder "at rest" (not cocked and the trigger held back) it measures .008 with the cylinder pulled to the rear and .002 with the cylinder pushed all the way forward.

Is this to excessive?
Does anyone know for sure what the specs should be?
JED1177 is offline  
Old September 4, 2007, 09:12 PM   #2
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
I assume you are talking about the barrel/cylinder gap. I don't know what Colt's spec is/was, but the ideal is about .006"-.007". I would not worry about .008", or about the amount of endshake you mention.

Folks make a bit too much of endshake. It has to be pretty bad before other problems (lead shaving, misfires) result. Like any mechanical device, the parts need room to move; in addition, if the b/c gap is too small, firing a dozen rounds will heat the cylinder enough that it will bind and not turn. That is a fairly common happening in cowboy action shooting where folks with closely fitted revolvers have had binding from heat and/or powder residue.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old September 5, 2007, 12:11 AM   #3
Dfariswheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,562
Answered in his other post.

Colt factory spec is .003" max for end shake.
Dfariswheel is offline  
Old September 17, 2007, 08:32 PM   #4
Harry Bonar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2004
Location: In the Vincent, Ohio general area.
Posts: 1,804
Colt

Sir:
Yes, the specs are tight but my experience with Colt revolvers is about like yours - I'm not impressed with Colt revolvers but I'd not worry about it - it's about par for Colt revolvers. I mean no insult or offense.
Harry B.
Harry Bonar is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03773 seconds with 9 queries