March 26, 2019, 06:56 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2009
Posts: 406
|
38 special
Greetings,
How does a 38 Special +P from a 4" bbl. stack up against the 9mm? That is all. Rmocarsky |
March 26, 2019, 07:11 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2004
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 966
|
According to ballistics by the inch, with a 4" barrel for the 9mm, the 9mm has a 150-200 FPS edge with comparable bullet weights.
http://www.ballisticsbytheinch.com/
__________________
All that is neccessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke |
March 26, 2019, 07:52 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,970
|
158gr. .38spl @ 875fps @ 268.5 kinetic foot pounds muzzle energy.
147gr. 9mm @ 950fps. @ 294.5 kinetic foot pounds muzzle energy. |
March 26, 2019, 09:16 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
|
If it is for self defense I'll bet a bad guy can't tell you which one hurts the most, or which one killed them the best!
|
March 26, 2019, 10:45 PM | #5 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,872
|
Shot placement is everything. 38 Special beats a rock or the finger.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
March 27, 2019, 07:26 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 10, 2005
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 2,747
|
I wouldn't want to be shot with either. Even in non-+P form, either are a good choice for self defense.
__________________
God's creatures big and small, eat them one, eat them all. |
March 27, 2019, 01:52 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 23, 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 697
|
Close, but no cigar. The problem is that 38 Special does not seem to offer nearly as wide a range of self defense ammunition as there is for 9 mm Parabellum.
|
March 27, 2019, 02:29 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2018
Location: Idaho
Posts: 107
|
https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/
Gel tests aren't perfect but this still has a lot of useful info to compare different calibers, including 9mm and 38. |
March 29, 2019, 11:45 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
|
Don't get too wrapped up in power figures. At the end of the wound channel you can look back to find a pretty long bloody hole that either one of them made. It's my understanding that there are far more important things to worry about than whether or not one cartridge is stronger or faster than the other by the small margin such as comparing standard nine to .38.
You aren't comparing the nine to the .357. |
March 31, 2019, 01:51 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 2, 2001
Location: Out West in Rim Country
Posts: 1,093
|
rmocarsky, I have chronographed some 38 Special and 9mm in a variety of firearms and would have no argument with BBTI's numbers. If anything though, I've found BBTI's 150-200 FPS advantage of the 9MM to be conservative......
__________________
COTEP 640, NRA Life |
March 31, 2019, 04:54 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,970
|
|
March 31, 2019, 05:13 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2014
Location: Bout as south as it gets
Posts: 1,238
|
327 magnum vs. 38 special
what is The average speed of a 32 H&R 80 grain Hornady ammo vs. the average speed of a 38 special?
The same question is for Muzzle Energy ft.-lb. The 32 H&R Hornady is fired from a LCR 327 in magnum 1.87" The 38 special is fired from any revolver of similar barrel length I hope I wrote this post correctly. |
April 1, 2019, 11:45 AM | #13 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
Quote:
Quote:
Folks may want to pick up a reloading manual, new or used, and do some comparing to the ballistics there. Or Forker's book Ammo and Ballistics. These are often easier to use than the internet. http://www.ballisticsbytheinch.com/32hr.html http://www.brassfetcher.com/Handguns/Handguns.html https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/ These and other places may help you. Here look at some of the ammo here. You can look up the technical specs by clicking on what you want to look at. https://www.midwayusa.com/32-h-and-r-magnum/br?cid=9523 https://www.midwayusa.com/38-special/br?cid=21694 https://www.midwayusa.com/9mm-luger/br?cid=21659 tipoc
__________________
1. All guns are always loaded. 2. Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy. 3. Keep your finger off the trigger till you are ready to shoot. 4. Identify your target and know what is beyond it. |
||
April 1, 2019, 12:59 PM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: September 30, 2015
Posts: 86
|
If you look throughout history, many people have been killed with a standard LRN bullet from 22s to 45s. So don't short change the 38 special.
|
April 2, 2019, 09:35 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 24, 2006
Posts: 1,900
|
Factory 38 ammo has to be kept mild due to the proliferation of old and crappy guns in this caliber. The +P really isn't and I consider it a very weak load. Properly loaded the 38 can match the 9mm but no factory load will do it.
|
April 2, 2019, 10:37 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
|
They are really two different cartridges with completely different properties. you could create a load that would match the nine simply based on capacity and bullet characteristics,
The nine, however, is loaded to 35,000 or so pressure and the .38 special is limited to roughly half that for standard loads. If you loaded the .38 special up to 35,000 pressure, you would have a .357 magnum. The nine was created for lighter high velocity semi automatic rounds and the .38 was created as a black powder equivalent round, with high capacity and heavy bullets, for use with guns made to shoot lower pressures. Weaker steel and 1800's workmanship. |
April 5, 2019, 06:35 AM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 22, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,625
|
Quote:
__________________
Cherish our flag, honor it, defend it in word and deed, or get the hell out. Our Bill of Rights has been paid for by heros in uniform and shall not be diluted by misguided governmental social experiments. We owe this to our children, anything less is cowardice. USAF FAC, 5th Spl Forces, Vietnam Vet '69-'73. |
|
April 5, 2019, 10:56 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 22, 2010
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,305
|
I am with Brian, except
38 special is a straight wall case .357” vs a smaller tapered case .355” .38 is a much better starting foundation for hand loading ammunition. .357 magnum is a better choice in a 4” barrel because you never need to go full throttle, but you have the choice. I suspect the resale value on .357s is better because “more is better” mentality |
April 5, 2019, 12:55 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
Doing what? Comparing 'em is an apples and oranges thing.
SAAMI Max pressure for the .38 Special +P is 18,500 PSI. 35,000 for the 9mm. However, that doesn't mean a lot if you're trying to compare which one is better for SD. The answer to that question is neither is better. Poke a hole in a bad guy with either and he'll stop bothering you. "...the ballistics there..." Rarely any ballistics in loading manuals. Ballistics isn't just about velocity or pressures. If the manual even has pressure numbers. |
April 5, 2019, 08:59 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 10, 2014
Posts: 1,390
|
I've got a few boxes of Winchester 200gr 38sp that look like they might hurt if you put one it a bad guys pelt.
|
April 6, 2019, 02:23 AM | #21 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 29,005
|
Quote:
Suppose I compare a modern .38Spl +p with an expanding bullet that actually expands against the original 9mm load which was a 124gr FMJ at 1050fps from a 4" barrel. Not quite the same thing is it? if you know where to look, (or you're old enough to remember) there are decades and decades of gun writers ALL rating the .38 Special above the 9mm for self defense. The "why" was simple. In those days, there were NO factory loaded JHP bullets. The .38 Special was loaded with lead bullets which would, sometimes, deform and expand a bit. The 9mm was loaded with FMJ bullets which would not. Today, there is a much, much wider selection of loads in both calibers, so comparisons have to be as much "apples to apples" as we can make them, or they're essentially meaningless. And, don't take anybody's velocity numbers as gospel for what you will get from your gun. Probably close, but variations of as much as 100fps are not unknown.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
April 6, 2019, 11:13 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
|
I'd like to point out something that has been touched on but not explicitly pointed out.
Our bullets are precisely engineered and designed to function perfectly within a reasonably wide range of velocities, and designed to function well under as many conditions as can be expected. Frankly, when you collect matching brand and weight bullets at similar energy levels and velocity, the tested bullets from either of those rounds at with similar attributes will be indistinguishable by any normal means. I guess that only a cannelure would give it away to the average guy. There are no absolutes. Using either of those rounds may give slightly different performance traits. Now consider that there are too many variables, and unpredictable happenings. A round may work perfectly 90% of the time in normal use. Then, the next round will hit the spleen, reverse course, and pop out of the bad guy's nose. Don't plan on anything based on the round, the bullet, the gun. None of those things matter compared to the simple facts of random deviations. That said, will the .38 gives the same level of performance as the .500 S&W? Don't be daft. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that you will have to make major alterations in the two test subjects before you can get easily measurable differences. |
April 6, 2019, 12:11 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
Quote:
It's hard to tell if the question involves ballistics (energy and momentum) or choice of a sidearm for some unstated purpose. tipoc
__________________
1. All guns are always loaded. 2. Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy. 3. Keep your finger off the trigger till you are ready to shoot. 4. Identify your target and know what is beyond it. |
|
April 6, 2019, 01:23 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
|
Either one works quite well as the starter pistol for the fat man's rush for safety.
Good point made. I guess that in the strictest sense the 9mm overall length at 1.140 compared to the .38 spl at 1.55 means that the .38 is better, but factually, if you are using archaic rounds, you can't stack them up at all. Using modern rounds with flat faced hollow points they both stack up very well. I guess that this is the same answer I gave earlier, but just a ridiculous turn on the phraseology. |
April 6, 2019, 03:28 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,895
|
It depends on the ammo, the boutique stuff from Buffalo Bore/Underwood/Doubletap will likely exceed most 9mm, but when we're talking about off the shelf Walmart ammo, the 9mm will beat it.
I personally don't buy .38 Special only revolvers with barrels over 3 inches as you get so much more out of .357 and still have the option of .38. For 9mm revolvers, it's snub lengths only, there's no sense in a 4 inch 9mm revolver unless you want a revolver you can shoot a lot at the range and not spend a lot of money on ammo. One thing I do want to mention is I find that cheap (the stuff under $15 a box) 9mm ammo shoots better than the cheap .38 ammo, which always costs more. If this is for self defense, 9mm is fine, but if you're looking for defense against a hog or some other large-ish animal, .38 and it's heavier bullets is better.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
|
|