PDA

View Full Version : RANGE REPORT: Savage Mako .22LR


cslinger
December 29, 2006, 06:31 PM
<Art's Grammaw had to clean up a really low-rent comment.>

I have been very fortunite in my firearms purchases over the years in that even the ones that had minor problems or slight flaws were really not all that bad. I have never really gotten a lemon so to speak, well until now.

I picked up a Savage Mako .22 Long Rifle, which is basically a limited run of Savage Mark II bolt action with a heavy barrel, nice stock and accutrigger.

The subject in question can be seen below.
http://www.myfishingpictures.com/img/115125.JPG

http://www.myfishingpictures.com/img/115126.JPG

So on to the review. As always ratings are out of 5 rounds with 1 round being the worst and 5 rounds being the best.

My mamma always said that if you can't say something nice......so I will start with the good.

Appearance - 5 ROUNDS - The gun is a very nice looking and interesting piece. Hence the reason I was drawn to it. Kind of like a custom 10/22 in appearance.

Accuracy - 5 ROUNDS - Now when I was actually able to fire three or four rounds in a row the gun was laser beam accurate. I had boresighted it and was using a Leupold 2x7 scope. At 25 yards three rounds literally went through the same hole. At 50 an itty bitty cloverleaf was formed.

Ergonomics - 4 ROUNDS- The gun fit very well and felt good in the hand. The only thing I didin't particularly like was the comb on the stock seemed a bit high.

Trigger - 4 ROUNDS - The accutrigger, when it worked, was actually rather nice. Made for some pretty easy shooting.

Now with the good out of the way, on to the bad.

Fit and Finish - 2 ROUNDS - The stock had some rough cuts in the infinished areas and the bolt was a bit rough etc. It looked and felt good but any close examination revealed warts so to speak.

Reliability - 0 ROUNDS - What can I say this damn think was one of the worst POS's I have ever experienced. Upon loading the magazine up and inserting it for the first time, the trigger and safety completely froze. Have no idea why. So out come the magazine. Still frozen. Ejected the loaded round and threw it away. Loaded a round manually and was able to fire, only to find the cased wouldn't eject. This goes on for the 20 or so rounds I fired through it. I cannot express how poor the function of this rifle was. Not just FTE's or FTF's but total lockups of the trigger safety system. I have never given a 0 round before.

Build Quality - 1 ROUND - The bolt steel was soft and not at all impressive.

Value - 1 ROUND - What can I say, $350 for a gun that doesn't work and isn't made very well even if it had worked. I was not impressed. If the gun had functioned as it should then Value would like be 3 rounds.

Cool Factor - 3 ROUNDS - The gun looked cool, had a cool marketing gimmick with the Mako shark thing but all in all it was just a Savage Mark II and not a very good one at that.

Overall - 1 ROUND - A gun that doesn't work is simply not worth having. Bolt actions are not exactly new, high technology these days. At any rate I was not happy.

Now with all of that being said this story has a happy ending my friends. You see my local gun monger, being a prince among men, immediately took the rifle back for a full refund upon hearing about my problems and was very apologetic. The rifle is being sent back to Savage and I now have a CZ452 full stock on order from the same dealer. What more can one ask for then good customer service, especially since we all know that all gun sales are typically final. So even though I got a bad product I got stellar service and have a rifle on the way that I have been wanting for quite some time.

So one last rating for this review.

Local Gun Dealer - 5+ ROUNDS - The local guy came through for me without hesitation and that is worth the extra buck a box of ammo or the extra 40 bucks for a gun in my book.

Jseime
December 29, 2006, 09:08 PM
That looks like a really nice gun but you got the same thing i had with my savage... no reliability.

My old 110L would not feed period no matter what i did that thing wouldnt feed after the first round. It cost me a six point white-tail...twice and I went and bought a controlled round feed Ruger.

tINY
December 30, 2006, 05:04 AM
I just picked one up - hope to shoot it tomorrow. I'll let you know if it works.


The "Made in Canada" stamped on it has me a bit worried, though.....




-tINY

Fremmer
December 30, 2006, 07:00 AM
Excellent review. Too bad about that gun; it looks pretty neat.

arkie2
December 30, 2006, 08:14 PM
Thanks for the report. I've been thinking about buying a .22 bolt and really like the Savage .270 I have now so I probably would have given this rifle serious consideration. Have you talked to anyone at Savage?

tINY
December 31, 2006, 09:21 PM
Alright - here's what I found....

Ended up with high rings to get the scope in the right place. This is not a big problem as the higher scope mount extends the pbr a bit. The end of a soda can is about 3 1/2 inches, so now I can hold dead on out to a bit further if I want to sight it that way. The scope that ended up on the Mako was an "Ultralux" that I bought at a gun show 12 years ago for about $25. It's a fixed 6x42 that isn't real bright, but held zero on my 300 WM....

I took the bolt out to have a look and found that the thing was coated in light weight oil. Fine. I wiped it off and used grease (tetra gun) and took the extracters off the bolt to get everything coated lightly.

Went to wipe the barrel out and found that the rollover cheek rest is a bit high to allow easy access to the bore. Cleaning will be a two-handed affair with one on the back of the rod and one flexing the cleaning rod slightly at the cheek rest. It's not a big deal, really. That cheek rest makes the rifle fit really nice so I'll live with it.

At first, the spent shells didn't want to eject. Then I took the extracters off and swapped them. They are a little different and the black one needs to go on the right side. Perfect feeding and exctraction/ejection afterwards. Fired standard and high velocity from Federal and remington and even tried the SSS from Aguila.

After I got the scope happy, others showed up at the gravel pit so I went to pu ton my hearing cups. I didn't need protection with any ammo I fired, but the handguns and SKS are a bit loud for bare ears. That nice rollover cheek rest wants to occupy the same space as my hearing cups. So... I dug out some spongies and put them in my ears.

Once the scope seemed on, I was hitting cans, soda bottles and bits of left-over pidgeons out to about 40 yards offhand easily. I like that trigger! Out at about 90-110 yards, hitting soda cans required an improvised rest over a big rock and wasn't so easy. It might have been the cheap ammo or me. I wasn't ready to lay down in the mud, so I wasn't that stable. I think it was me - that 6x scope lets you see how much you are moving around....

No excuses, though. That's why I got this rifle. I can practice offhand cheaply on a shorter chunk of land with less of a backstop. If I came up steady and let off the trigger, I hit what I wanted.

The bolt is a quick, short throw and smooth. With the scope mounted high the bolt handle was easy to manipulate. The safety is a little hard to get to, but I usually keep the bolt open until I am ready to shoot, so I didn't fuss with it much.

For comparison, I brought along the Rem Gamemaster that my dad bought new in the 1950's. The tube held almost 3 times as many rounds and the iron sights were a little harder to see as the light got dim. It wasn't as smooth as the Savage, but the stock works well for the irons. The Savage is a much more refined feeling action, but I'm not giving up the Remmy either.





-tINY

tINY
January 2, 2007, 04:20 PM
I took the rifle apart and got some pictures.

http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=22017&d=1167772797

http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=22018&d=1167772797

The action is secured by two action screws and there is a circular recoil lug. This lug has about a 1/4" play in the recess in the stock. The barrel is not free floated. Seems pretty easy to bed if need be after shooting it from the bench.

http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=22019&d=1167772797



-tINY

tINY
January 2, 2007, 04:25 PM
A few places were a little rough but the only rough part that you can see when the rifle is together is the cut- outs in the forend. This may lead to a bit of dremmel work and maybe some black paint if I end up bedding it.

http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=22020&d=1167773112

http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=22021&d=1167773112


-tINY

tINY
January 2, 2007, 04:33 PM
The machining and design are good where it counts.

http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=22022&d=1167773550

http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=22023&d=1167773550


-tINY

tINY
January 2, 2007, 04:35 PM
I like it.

http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=22024&d=1167773719

-tINY