January 15, 2024, 07:45 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
|
Universal M1 Carbine
A friend of mine is selling his Universal M1 Carbine. I am discovering that there is a lot know about these rifles. I never paid much attention to them until now as I never had an opportunity to buy one until now. Seems the Universal made carbines are considered less desirable and command less money? He hasn't given me a price yet and I am trying to figure out what to offer him. I have only seen it once, but did get to fire a few rounds through it a couple of years ago. It wasn't for sale then so I didn't look it over real close. Supposed to talk it over with him later this week.
|
January 15, 2024, 08:00 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 399
|
People can say what they want, however, Universal has been around forever with great success. Had one during the 70s with never an issue. No idea of today's values.
|
January 15, 2024, 09:22 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
|
Just got a message from him. He wants $500 for it. From what I've seen, I think that is a fair price.
|
January 15, 2024, 09:47 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: East shore of Lake Michigan.
Posts: 717
|
Depending on the condition, it seems a fair asking price. Nice thing about the Universal M1 is that military GI magazines run good with them. Watch out for the lexan magazines...they tend to stretch open, causing feed issues. Many Universal M1 parts DO NOT interchange with GI M1's.
__________________
Sent from my Tandy 1000 |
January 15, 2024, 06:39 PM | #5 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 29,033
|
The Univeral M1 Carbines were decent enough copies of the GI gun, but most parts won't interchange. They will run on GI mags just fine (assuming everything is in proper working order).
They were never in demand by collectors like the actual GI guns were, and are, so market value was always less, particularly when they were still in production. Essentially they were made for the guys who wanted an M1 carbine to play with but didn't want to pay carbine collector prices. And that's still what they are today. In today's market, $500 is not a bad price. If it were an actual GI gun $500 would be a steal these days. Enjoy!
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
January 15, 2024, 07:09 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,481
|
The earlier Universal's that were made using some USGI parts or the later versions made with GI-TYPE parts are often good shooters.
The later versions that changed the design were well known for being junky. These have a different gas system, and an operating rod that's made of stamped metal and welded together. These undesirable Universal's can be easily recognized by an open slot on the op rod through which you can see the right hand bolt locking lug. If it's one of those Universal's it's best to stay away. |
January 15, 2024, 10:17 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,940
|
Does it have the newer dual recoil springs, or the conventional single spring? I would avoid the dual spring.
-TL Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
January 16, 2024, 01:35 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2019
Location: Texas
Posts: 450
|
I've owned a few (never shot them). The older ones are probably better. The older ones were cobbled together with surplus parts and when that ran dry Universal either started making their own parts or had them made for them.
|
January 16, 2024, 03:29 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,806
|
This thread kills me. I went to the CMP north store back around 2010 to get my M1 and I saw dozens of M1 carbines sitting there for $400, some dealer bought pretty much all of them before I could blink.
|
January 16, 2024, 10:42 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,940
|
Quote:
-TL Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
|
January 16, 2024, 11:44 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2017
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,133
|
There is one on GB right now that has 31 bids, at $550. There are several others with no bids around 650, so I’m gonna guess the top end for these is $550 - $600. So $500 would be a good price, especially without sales tax or shipping. Jump on it.
|
January 16, 2024, 04:11 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
|
We talked and I agreed on $500. Will go get it tomorrow. I will update this thread when I get it.
|
January 18, 2024, 06:39 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
|
Made the deal today. Not sure if it was the best one to buy, but I think it is almost brand new. Got a box of bullets with it and I think that what is gone out of the box is all that has been fired through this rifle. He got it from an old man that lived behind him on the next street. The gun looks brand new. Not a scratch anywhere.
|
January 18, 2024, 07:06 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: East shore of Lake Michigan.
Posts: 717
|
Very nice looking rifle, and a 15 round military style magazine to boot...you done well.
__________________
Sent from my Tandy 1000 |
January 18, 2024, 07:23 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,481
|
Unfortunately, that's the last version Universal made with the double recoil springs and stamped op rod.
These had a significant history of quality problems and that's what put them out of business. Watch for problems with the non-original gas system, and op rod breakage. |
January 18, 2024, 07:53 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
|
Well shat. That sure makes me feel good. Do they just fall apart or what?
|
January 18, 2024, 08:05 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: East shore of Lake Michigan.
Posts: 717
|
Don't sweat the negative...I let my 15 yr grandson and a pal of his, (supervised) blast the crap out of mine and prior to those 2 clowns, I have shot it well over 2500 times myself with never an issue. We also blast an original G.I. issue.
__________________
Sent from my Tandy 1000 |
January 19, 2024, 08:00 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,481
|
"Well shat. That sure makes me feel good. Do they just fall apart or what?"
To be fair, not all of the later Universal's had problems, just enough to give them a pretty bad name. Going on memory, something would break in the non-original gas system, and the stamped and welded op rod would come apart. As I recall the gas system used a pinned-in gas piston instead of the original threaded system, and it tended to break. When it did the barrel was ruined. Since the later Universal used a double recoil spring instead of the original single, replacing the barrel with an original type wasn't possible. All you can do is shoot it to see if it's good or not. I would give the op rod and gas system a very close inspection. |
January 20, 2024, 11:05 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,280
|
Yours is way nicer than mine, I bought mine back around 2008. However, it is a fun rifle to take to the range and it's surprisingly accurate as well. If the gas system ever goes bad, I'll sell it as a parts gun and buy a new production M1 Carbine as the USGI carbines have surpassed what I usually want to spend on a shooter.
__________________
NRA Life Member |
January 21, 2024, 09:43 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
|
Lots of confusing, conflicting information out there. I am pretty sure this gun is a 2nd Generation Universal with serial# 137xxx. Some say this is the generation with the most problems. Some say it's the 3rd Generation that had all the problems. Even saw one site that claimed a 4th Generation. No cracks in my op-rod. Going to tear it down further and inspect the area forward the gas piston for damage. Those seem to be the two failures most people talk about. Learning!
|
January 21, 2024, 10:47 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 4,052
|
Had a universal. Was not reliable. Definitely not mil-spec. 15rnd mags only, the 30s did not feed reliably. S&b ran well, armscore was filthy abd under powered. I would not do it again.
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload. Last edited by Shadow9mm; January 22, 2024 at 06:34 AM. |
January 21, 2024, 12:54 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 1,804
|
Looks good to me
Hdonly,
I think you should stop teasing us about your lucky purchase and shoot it with some fresh ammo and report back here. Save the old peters ammo for nostalgia. It's a nice looking gun for sure and I would bet if you don't shoot it a lot, it will be fine as a home defense carbine for many years to come. I would bet the ones that broke down had a lot of rounds on them before something went wrong. I have read the GI mags were pretty flimsy on M1 carbines so if you have any issues, I'd try a different magazine which should be easy to find. Its too bad these don't take all GI parts. |
January 21, 2024, 01:20 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
|
Got new ammo on the way.
|
January 27, 2024, 11:06 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2013
Posts: 340
|
My new to me Universal M1 Carbine shoots like a dream. I bought an extra magazine (Promag CAR-A1) that I am disappointed in. The way it's made, it will not hold the bolt open after the last round fired like the original Universal magazine does. Why would they do that?
|
January 27, 2024, 12:04 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2017
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,133
|
Promag products are notoriously POS. Get an original GI mag.
|
|
|