August 25, 2013, 07:56 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 23, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,676
|
Downloading surp guns?
This might belong in the reloading forum, but it does not address any specific loadings. My question is thus: There are alot of neat milsurp vintage guns that are lightweight carbines, not full sized rifles. But alot of them fire a full sized cart designed for a full length rifle application. In the carbines, or short guns, they develop alot of muzzle blast and recoil, and can sometimes be a pain to shoot very much. What I wondered is if anyone that handloads had tried reduced loads for their downsized carbine types to make them pleasant to shoot with good results for accuracy, etc.? Like maybe load some shorty to perhaps like 30-30 power levels or so. I understand that case capacity might make this trickier than it first appears unless you find a light powder charge or lighter weight bullet that works without creating problems.
__________________
Your gun is like your nose, it is just wrong for someone else to pick it for you! |
August 25, 2013, 08:12 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 10, 1999
Location: High Desert NV
Posts: 2,850
|
|
August 27, 2013, 05:30 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 23, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,676
|
That is a good start or ideas. I was mulling over why I never reloaded for the Mosin, and eventually ditched all the short barrel MN's I ever had, after firing them not a great deal with full bore surp ammo. As an instance. I suppose I could have downloaded the round to a more enjoyable level for more shooting. And there are others that have a reputation from the short barrels and powerful government loadings. Heck, I even found a normal K98 not much fun to shoot with that cup steel buttplate.
__________________
Your gun is like your nose, it is just wrong for someone else to pick it for you! |
August 27, 2013, 06:01 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Work up some loads using 5744, it makes nice mild, Accurate, rounds.
I use it in all my surplus rifles and a few others, including my 375 H&H.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
August 27, 2013, 06:43 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,705
|
If you check out the Lyman cast bullet book, they list a lot of reduced loads using inexpensive lead bullets. I've used a lot of .30 ca. cast in things like 30/30, 30/06 etc., and there are all kinds of possibilities for other dia. bullets as well.
|
August 28, 2013, 08:26 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
my steyr is arriving today, I'll be expirimenting with trail boss and cast bullets to get a nice, light recoiling, low reporting load.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
August 28, 2013, 03:33 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,802
|
Most of my lightweight loads for .308 Win. and 30-06 class rifles use cast bullets and 25.0 gr. of either IMR of H4895. My wife wanted a light load to practice with her Ruger M77 RSI in .308 but that rifle is extremely fussy about ammo and won't shoot cast bullets accurately at all. I tried an experiment using the 25.0 gr/4895 load with some 150 gr. Winchester Power Point bullets I had on hand and they worked reasonably well for her. If I were to try that with a 30-06 level cardtidge, I think I'd go 2.0 full grains higher.
Paul B.
__________________
COMPROMISE IS NOT AN OPTION! |
August 29, 2013, 11:09 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
There is always that balance in accuracy and velocity. I load down to save gun wear.
I am using TAC in the 30-06 and have done well with it though its not one of the normal recommended accuracy loads. What works in one gun doesn't necessarily work in another, let alone across different mfgs. Rifling differences are important in that equation. My 1917 with original barrels likes the 175 gr with TAC. The JA barrel one prefers the 4831 at a couple hundred fps faster. |
August 29, 2013, 10:15 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 13, 2011
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 661
|
Having a couple of Spanish milsurps in 7x57mm mauser, I handload
to pressures of the carbines era (40,000-44,000 CUP) which gives me a velocity of 2400 fps with a 160grn bullet, 2500 fps with a 150grn, and 2600 fps with a 140 these are plenty good deer killers as well as black bear. a standard 30-30 load with 150 grn runs about 2300 fps, so the mauser is just slightly more powerful with the same recoil or less, depending on the rifle. These mausers are a pleasure to shoot and plenty accurate, not scoped, lightweight and easy to carry all day. |
|
|