The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: General Handgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 15, 2013, 03:03 AM   #1
jolly1
Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2012
Posts: 83
Pistol Bench Rest?

Need an advice.

Which pistol bench rest can be recommended?
The purpose is to sight in micro metric sights on 6 inch target 9 mm pistol.

And preferably to be possible to order by internet?

Many thanks!
jolly1 is offline  
Old June 15, 2013, 10:02 AM   #2
DaleA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,312
Not sure if this is what you mean but the Ransom Rest is the 'gold' standard for mechanical pistol shooting devices.

It's expensive and you need inserts for your gun to fit your gun onto the rest. Ransom has a *large* number of inserts for different guns.

To me, the Ransom Rest is something a shooting club should buy to be used by the club members as IMhO it's too expensive for an individual. How often as an individual would you use it anyway?

Most of my friends use a sandbag or bag of rice on a table to give them a pretty good supported shooting position.

Ransom Rest page:
http://www.ransomrest.com/

Ransom Rest for sale by Midway:
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/252...-shooting-rest

Ransom Rest handgun inserts:
http://www.ransomrest.com/inserts.html
DaleA is offline  
Old June 15, 2013, 10:34 AM   #3
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
I use one of these or bags.....

buck460XVR is offline  
Old June 15, 2013, 11:09 AM   #4
newfrontier45
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2012
Posts: 921
I have a Ransom Rest, a number of inserts and use it quite often. It ain't cheap but consider it instead of your next handgun purchase if you really want to know what your guns will do. Most shooters don't bother bench testing their handguns anyway and are satisfied making noise at the range so it's moot for them. It saves me a lot of time that would otherwise be lost due to fatigue and/or eye strain. So I can do a lot of testing in a short period of time without my eyes giving me a fit or developing a flinch. Ransom Rest testing provides a much better baseline than possible with other methods.

The common method I use for bench testing is to settle the revolver into leather sandbags at the junction of barrel and frame. Do not let the butt rest or touch anything. Rest your forearms on the edge of the bench or another pair of bags. This is how the pros do it.
newfrontier45 is offline  
Old June 15, 2013, 08:14 PM   #5
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
Nothing can beat a good mechanical rest for testing the accuracy of a pistol, but a simple sandbag rest and two-hand hold will do quite well. The trick is to hold the gun in the hands and rest the wrists on the sandbags. Letting the butt or the barrel of the pistol touch the sandbags or the bench will be detrimental to accuracy and give inconsistent results.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old June 16, 2013, 03:44 AM   #6
Fire_Moose
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2013
Posts: 211
Re: Pistol Bench Rest?

Interesting. I didn't know that. When testing loads ill put the butt of the pistol on the bench and shoot like that.

Wonder what my loads do when tested right!
Fire_Moose is offline  
Old June 16, 2013, 04:11 AM   #7
darkgael
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2006
Location: Homes in Brooklyn, NY and in Pennsylvania.
Posts: 5,473
Yep

Quote:
Nothing can beat a good mechanical rest for testing the accuracy of a pistol, but a simple sandbag rest and two-hand hold will do quite well. The trick is to hold the gun in the hands and rest the wrists on the sandbags. Letting the butt or the barrel of the pistol touch the sandbags or the bench will be detrimental to accuracy and give inconsistent results.
+1

Pete
__________________
“Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports ... all others are games.” Ernest Hemingway ...
NRA Life Member
darkgael is offline  
Old June 16, 2013, 10:38 AM   #8
newfrontier45
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2012
Posts: 921
It works better to rest the revolver at the frame/barrel junction than have it float. At least, that's how John Taffin and Brian Pearce do it and that's how I do it when I shoot 2" groups at 50yds with the big bores. Or quarter inch groups at 25yds with .22's.
newfrontier45 is offline  
Old June 17, 2013, 11:27 AM   #9
jolly1
Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2012
Posts: 83
Gents,
Thank you all for the input!
Very helpful!
jolly1 is offline  
Old June 18, 2013, 08:20 PM   #10
s4s4u
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 365
Quote:
It works better to rest the revolver at the frame/barrel junction than have it float.
It is better to not rest any part of the gun on anything but your hands. You might shoot a decent group to POA when rested, but then shoot that same load unsupported and that POI will change. Using a rest is fine for load development, but I always check my zero in the same manner that I intend to employ the gun.
s4s4u is offline  
Old June 19, 2013, 09:01 PM   #11
KyJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 9,142
Quote:
It is better to not rest any part of the gun on anything but your hands. You might shoot a decent group to POA when rested, but then shoot that same load unsupported and that POI will change. Using a rest is fine for load development, but I always check my zero in the same manner that I intend to employ the gun.
But that's apples to oranges isn't it? If you are strictly testing how small a group a gun will shoot, use whatever method will give you the smallest group, even if further from zero. Once you know how a particular gun and load shoots, you can adjust the sights or your aim accordingly.
KyJim is offline  
Old June 19, 2013, 09:18 PM   #12
s4s4u
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 365
Quote:
Once you know how a particular gun and load shoots, you can adjust the sights or your aim accordingly.
Correct.
s4s4u is offline  
Old June 19, 2013, 10:49 PM   #13
newfrontier45
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2012
Posts: 921
Quote:
But that's apples to oranges isn't it? If you are strictly testing how small a group a gun will shoot, use whatever method will give you the smallest group, even if further from zero. Once you know how a particular gun and load shoots, you can adjust the sights or your aim accordingly.
Exactly!

That said, I don't see a difference in point of impact between rested and offhand shooting. Where I do see a significant shift in POI is with or without gloves. When it's very hot or very cold outside I use a thin leather shooting glove and POI will change at least a couple inches at 25yds.
newfrontier45 is offline  
Old June 20, 2013, 08:18 AM   #14
spacecoast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
Quote:
Letting the butt or the barrel of the pistol touch the sandbags or the bench will be detrimental to accuracy and give inconsistent results.
From the images available of a Ransom Rest, it does not appear that it allows the barrel or butt of the handgun to rest on anything. A local RO advised me to rest my wrists and forearms on bags while holding the gun, but not to rest the gun itself. That said, I'm sure that bags or a rest such as that shown by Buck460XVR would be fine for most shooters.
spacecoast is offline  
Old June 20, 2013, 11:41 AM   #15
newfrontier45
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2012
Posts: 921
The Ransom Rest clamps it by the grip frame. Without grip panels present.
newfrontier45 is offline  
Old June 20, 2013, 11:49 AM   #16
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
The reason it is better not to rest the barrel or butt of the gun on the bench is that a gun (any gun) vibrates as it is fired, both from the force of the discharge and from the bullet moving down the barrel. Some have described the movement of a barrel as like a tuning fork.

When the barrel or butt is rested on something, even something fairly soft like sandbags, the vibrations are altered and the gun performs differently than it will when handheld. Even the Ransom rest does not fully mimic hand holding, but its purpose is to test the gun itself, not to sight it in or adjust it for normal hand-held shooting.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old June 20, 2013, 01:03 PM   #17
newfrontier45
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2012
Posts: 921
As I've said before, nestling the revolver into sand bags at the junction of barrel and frame works fine and is how most pros do it. If it didn't work, they (and therefore myself) wouldn't do it this way. It is my opinion that 99% of shooters never bench test a handgun and therefore, put very little effort into figuring out how to do it properly.

Resting the butt also works for guns with little recoil. This is how I test .22's and there is nothing inconsistent about the results. Doing this with guns that have significant recoil can cause stringing.
newfrontier45 is offline  
Old June 20, 2013, 01:19 PM   #18
SgtLumpy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2013
Posts: 779
I've never bench rested a pistol. What matters, in the end, is where my hand held groups are. Whether I off hand shoot a group that's an inch in diameter, or 12 inches in diameter, I still know if and which direction I need to move my sights (or my aim).


Sgt Lumpy
SgtLumpy is offline  
Old June 20, 2013, 01:25 PM   #19
newfrontier45
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2012
Posts: 921
How can you develop accurate loads without bench testing???
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
You can't.
newfrontier45 is offline  
Old June 20, 2013, 08:30 PM   #20
s4s4u
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 365
One of the more critical aspects of handgunning is the grip. Talking about the hand here and not the handle. Some designs are more forgiving than others, but all handguns require consistant tension of the strong hand at the moment of discharge to shoot to the same point. It takes more strength to hold a gun offhand than it does to set it on a pillow, and therefore more grip tension which reduces muzzle flip. Barring a jerk on the trigger, a handgun will generally shoot lower off-hand than from bags because recoil is more controlled with the firmer grip. This is why you must verify zero in the manner in which you will be likely to use the gun, which in most cases will not be from a bench.
s4s4u is offline  
Old June 21, 2013, 05:27 AM   #21
Jammer Six
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 827
I do exactly the opposite-- I make sure the floor of the magazine and the dust cover are in good contact with the sandbag.

If the weapon behaves differently because of that, then all that matters is that you consistently use the same method.
__________________
"Huh?" --Jammer Six, 1998
Jammer Six is offline  
Old June 21, 2013, 01:55 PM   #22
Erno86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2012
Location: Marriottsville, Maryland
Posts: 1,739
I use a heavy Hart pedestal rest. If you're
not planning on using just sand or lead bags, buy a pedestal rest that has some weight to it --- like a Hart, Sinclair, Caldwell, etc. Either way, you'll have to protect the sandbags from face of revolver cylinder fire with some rags. I buy "Bag of Rags" at an auto parts store --- and stuff them under my shirt, in front of my shoulder --- when I'm shooting a rifle. With a semi auto pistol...you don't have to worry about barrel pressure on a rest, for 1911 types.

At our range...we have two 3.5 foot high steel pedestal's --- with bolt holes, so we can bolt on a Ransom Rest.
__________________
That rifle hanging on the wall of the working class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."

--- George Orwell

Last edited by Erno86; June 21, 2013 at 02:03 PM.
Erno86 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10631 seconds with 9 queries