"Consensus" process

Ronbert · January 10, 2013, 05:25 PM

Watch for the so-called concensus to emerge. News stories are telling us that concensus is starting to emerge. Yeah, right.

This is a tactic used by the activist social engineer to move people from one position to another by managing their objections in a clever manner.

They begin with a position that's the desired endpoint. (it's predetermined but not announced to any except those sponsoring the change)

They pretend to have public stakeholder discussions.

They isolate, riducule and denigrate those who object to the new position. Essentially they create a rejection of the person whose views don't go with the program. Social isolation and ridicule are used to silence rational objections. (Facilitator school trains them to make this hard to notice.)

They might form small working groups for a little while and collect the input from those groups. (and ignore it)

Then they announce that concensus has been reached.

And surprise!

It's the predetermined outcome.
No one can object because they been part of the process.

It's called "being concensed."

Do you think that the concensus is that magazines of more than 10 rounds should be banned? And how about EBRs?

It's happening now. And their fingers never leave their hands...... :-(

Alabama Shooter · January 10, 2013, 06:31 PM

"They" already have a consensus. They just have not told us what it is yet.

medalguy · January 10, 2013, 07:46 PM

Uncle Joe (Biden, not Stalin) has been studying the violence problem in America for what now, four days? And he says the country has reached a consensus that "assault weapons" and "big clips" need to be banned. Man does he work fast. I would have thought it would take at least, oh, maybe 6 or 7 days for the consensus to form up.

Joe_Pike · January 10, 2013, 07:49 PM

Here you go. The title of the little snippit is:

Biden says consensus emerging on gun safety

http://news.yahoo.com/biden-says-con...-politics.html

Dr Big Bird PhD · January 10, 2013, 08:30 PM

Consensus is irrelevant to a right.

Alabama Shooter · January 10, 2013, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Consensus is irrelevant to a right.

The wolves have already decided what is for dinner.

**Tom Servo** · January 11, 2013, 12:40 AM

I suppose any closed and isolated group could form a consensus. That doesn't mean it applies to the larger population.

January 10, 2013, 05:25 PM	#1
Ronbert Senior Member Join Date: September 23, 2009 Location: Ft. Collins, CO. Posts: 398	"Consensus" process Watch for the so-called concensus to emerge. News stories are telling us that concensus is starting to emerge. Yeah, right. This is a tactic used by the activist social engineer to move people from one position to another by managing their objections in a clever manner. They begin with a position that's the desired endpoint. (it's predetermined but not announced to any except those sponsoring the change) They pretend to have public stakeholder discussions. They isolate, riducule and denigrate those who object to the new position. Essentially they create a rejection of the person whose views don't go with the program. Social isolation and ridicule are used to silence rational objections. (Facilitator school trains them to make this hard to notice.) They might form small working groups for a little while and collect the input from those groups. (and ignore it) Then they announce that concensus has been reached. And surprise! It's the predetermined outcome. No one can object because they been part of the process. It's called "being concensed." Do you think that the concensus is that magazines of more than 10 rounds should be banned? And how about EBRs? It's happening now. And their fingers never leave their hands...... :-(

January 10, 2013, 06:31 PM	#2
Alabama Shooter Senior Member Join Date: December 20, 2012 Location: Sweet Home Posts: 886	"They" already have a consensus. They just have not told us what it is yet. __________________ Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday.

January 10, 2013, 07:49 PM	#4
Joe_Pike Senior Member Join Date: December 30, 2010 Posts: 1,581	Here you go. The title of the little snippit is: Biden says consensus emerging on gun safety http://news.yahoo.com/biden-says-con...-politics.html __________________ Stay Groovy

January 10, 2013, 08:30 PM	#5
Dr Big Bird PhD Senior Member Join Date: October 26, 2012 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 779	Consensus is irrelevant to a right. __________________ I told the new me, "Meet me at the bus station and hold a sign that reads: 'Today is the first day of the rest of your life.'" But the old me met me with a sign that read: "Welcome back." Who you are is not a function of where you are. -Off Minor

January 11, 2013, 12:40 AM	#7
Tom Servo Staff Join Date: September 27, 2008 Location: Foothills of the Appalachians Posts: 13,059	I suppose any closed and isolated group could form a consensus. That doesn't mean it applies to the larger population. __________________ Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe

January 10, 2013, 07:46 PM	#3
medalguy Senior Member Join Date: August 31, 2009 Location: New Mexico Posts: 1,033	Uncle Joe (Biden, not Stalin) has been studying the violence problem in America for what now, four days? And he says the country has reached a consensus that "assault weapons" and "big clips" need to be banned. Man does he work fast. I would have thought it would take at least, oh, maybe 6 or 7 days for the consensus to form up.