The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 3, 2012, 03:38 PM   #1
327 FM
Join Date: July 3, 2012
Posts: 63
Handgun scopes

I would appreciate any advice or opinions on what scope might be best for a Ruger Super Redhawk.
327 FM is offline  
Old July 3, 2012, 04:23 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: October 29, 1999
Location: rural Illinois
Posts: 589
a 2x fixed or a variable in the 1.5-4x range. if you are looking for precision paper punching a 4x or higher variable, for hunting anything over 2x is probably too much IMO.
I have had Burris and Leupold LERs on handguns with good results.
Kingcreek is offline  
Old July 3, 2012, 04:34 PM   #3
Clifford L. Hughes
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2011
Location: Southern Californis
Posts: 795
327 FM.

A good low powered Burris or a low powered Leupold should fit your needs. With a 2X you get a wide field of view. On my contender I have a 2/7 X. When set on 7X the field of view is so small that I have difficulties finding a soda can at 100 yards. However, after I aquire the target I can pin point my shot.

Semper Fi.

Gunnery Sergeant
Clifford L. Hughes
USMC Retired
Clifford L. Hughes is offline  
Old July 3, 2012, 07:11 PM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2006
Location: NE FL.......
Posts: 1,081
What was said already is correct...........

I started with a Lupold 1.5X on a T-C Contender.........25 years or so ago.....and it worked well, liked it.

And then a friend let me use his with a Red one of those it.

One thing magnification and you do lose a few minutes early and late when the traditional scope would gather a little more light.

If you plan on long range stuff......listen to the Sgt..........
bswiv is offline  
Old July 4, 2012, 12:42 AM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: July 8, 2010
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 1,673
I use a SRH IN 454 Casull & a T/C encore pistol in 7mm-08 And a Nikon 2.5-8 x28 with good results. Bswiv is right you will lose light faster with a scope the higher power the faster. & you need a prop or sandbag with higher mag. also.But it sure helps @ 200yds.
BIG P is offline  
Old July 4, 2012, 08:22 AM   #6
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,309
Good answers so far. But lacking on one point.
Find out if your chosen scope will hold up to magnum recoil.
I have a scope on my desk in front of me that went belly up after one cylinder of .44 mag. shots from my Redhawk.
Whatever you choose, make sure it has a good warranty.
Rifleman1776 is offline  
Old July 4, 2012, 11:48 AM   #7
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Western Colorado, finally.
Posts: 19,118
From what I've seen, when the question is "handgun scope", the answer is Burris.
Still happily answering to the call-sign Peetza.
The problem, as you so eloquently put it, is choice.
-The Architect
He is no fool who gives what he can not keep to gain what he can not lose.
-Jim Eliott, paraphrasing Philip Henry.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old July 4, 2012, 11:15 PM   #8
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2005
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,347
I have a Leupold M8-4X EER on my Ruger Super Blackhawk Bisley in .45 Colt. I'm very pleased with it.

Just my 2ยข.
sasquatch is offline  
Old July 5, 2012, 04:36 AM   #9
327 FM
Join Date: July 3, 2012
Posts: 63
Thanks for all of your replies. You guys have been a big help.


I LOVE your gun! Last summer I had a chance to buy that same model for $500 and did not. Add that to the list of, "If I could go back in time."

Did you have to ream out the cylinder throats? Ruger has a reputation of beeing undersized on their 45 colts.
327 FM is offline  
Old July 6, 2012, 01:01 PM   #10
Wild Bill Bucks
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2005
Location: Southeastern Oklahoma, Next door to Sasquatch
Posts: 1,266
I put a Red Dot scope on my .44 Magnum Super Red Hawk about 5 years ago, and I doubted that it would hold up to the re-coil, but it has lasted through 2 batteries and at least 500 rounds, without any problems. It is much faster to get on target with than a conventional cross-hair type scope, which makes it great for hunting. I think I gave around $100.00 for it, which makes it the least amount of money I ever spent for a scope, that has lasted this long.
Wild Bill Bucks is offline  
Old July 6, 2012, 01:26 PM   #11
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 3,802
For what caliber, range and target?
Nathan is offline  
Old July 6, 2012, 04:17 PM   #12
327 FM
Join Date: July 3, 2012
Posts: 63

454 Casul and would only shoot 45 colt.

Deer and pronghorn

As far as I can be proficient. Wheather that's 70 yards or less or 125 yards or more.
327 FM is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2017 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent:
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.19717 seconds with 9 queries