The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 24, 2012, 09:18 AM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: October 2, 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 361
LEO's, Lawyers, and a Modified Trigger!

Recently picked up a Ruger LC9. This is going to be my new off duty carry for the foreseeable future. Love the gun. Size, thinness, even don't mind the extra safeties. Trouble is the trigger is not that much to my liking. Very heavy, long, and a long reset to boot. I've already put 500 rounds through it, and have been dry firing it a lot on a daily basis. It has smoothed out a bit, and I'm getting more used to it, however I see the Galloway mods that folks have done to theirs and I really want to install it to make my LC9 perfect (for me). The issue I'm having is the thought in the back of my head, if I ever need to use it, some soulless defense lawyer is going to try and hang me if he catches wind of a modified trigger. Here in NJ, when a LEO gets involved in a shooting, on or off duty, the weapon used immediately goes to the NJ State Police for a full forensic examination. I know Massad Ayoob has touched on this issue before and warns against "hair triggers" on carry guns. But I'm pretty sure this wouldn't be considered such. The Galloway trigger bar/hammer mod just shortens the trigger pull and reset. It doesn't aim to reduce the weight of the pull. Although I'm told it does a wee bit. Thoughts?
-Certified Glock Armorer
-NRA Certified Instructor

Last edited by Frank Ettin; March 24, 2012 at 11:25 AM. Reason: language
MontyCop05 is offline  
Old March 24, 2012, 11:56 AM   #2
Frank Ettin
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 8,745
This topic has been discussed some in the past. The issues of primary concern tend to be extremely light triggers or disabling of safety devices. But some modifications, such as smoothing out a trigger while retaining a reasonable "service" weight pull, improved sights, a new finish, etc., are probably pretty benign.

I kind of summarized my overall perspective in this post, in which I say the following:
...But other gun modifications, like full length guide rods, better sights, and the like, are probably benign and shouldn't be a problem. But it wouldn't hurt to have a good and non-technical explanation for why you did something...
More discussion of the subject generally may be found in the following threads:

Another consideration for you, as an LEO, is whether your agency has any applicable rules relating to the use by officers of modified firearms. We've run into such in the past.
Frank Ettin is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2017 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent:
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06207 seconds with 9 queries