|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 17, 2011, 06:59 PM | #26 |
Staff
Join Date: October 13, 2001
Posts: 3,355
|
Yet another step in the continued social vilification of past or recreational drug users by social conservatives. That classification apparently includes Schumer, strangely enough.
__________________
“The egg hatched...” “...the egg hatched... and a hundred baby spiders came out...” (blade runner) “Who are you?” “A friend. I'm here to prevent you from making a mistake.” “You have no idea what I'm doing here, friend.” “In specific terms, no, but I swore an oath to protect the world...” (continuum) “It's a goal you won't understand until later. Your job is to make sure he doesn't achieve the goal.” (bsg) |
January 19, 2011, 02:07 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 11, 1999
Location: Longmont, CO, USA
Posts: 4,530
|
It seems that the currently sitting president has smoked marijuana and we have the pics in addition to his own admission. I guess he would be disallowed the possession of a firearm under Schumer's rules.
__________________
Gun Control: The premise that a woman found in an alley, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose, is morally superior to allowing that same woman to defend her life with a firearm. "Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones. But a collection of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house." - Jules Henri Poincare "Three thousand people died on Sept. 11 because eight pilots were killed" -- former Northwest Airlines pilot Stephen Luckey |
January 19, 2011, 07:39 AM | #28 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Posts: 1,931
|
Quote:
Once any clerk with a SSN can access needed records, we'll be able to catch earlier problems and better determinations can obviously be made at an appropriate agency. Most of the ambiguities will eventually be worked out, but a system just isn't set up for all of this yet.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
January 19, 2011, 09:55 AM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2007
Location: Lago Vista TX
Posts: 2,425
|
If you don't have drugs in your system which can be detected by testing, WHY would you answer yes?? "Don't do drugs, kay??"
__________________
"The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." Albert Camus |
January 19, 2011, 05:45 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 5, 2000
Location: AoW Land, USA
Posts: 1,968
|
what is there to stop a rabid anti-gun "federal official" from simply saying someone stated they took illegal drugs, even though no such statement was made? How would this play out in the courts if the "statement" was challenged? Will it come down to "he said she said"? I could see this happening frequently.
|
January 19, 2011, 11:10 PM | #31 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,902
|
Interesting information from the Washington Post.
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
January 21, 2011, 04:12 PM | #32 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 18, 2011
Posts: 10
|
Pretty simplistic
Seems pretty simple to me. Don't use drugs.Drugs are illegal (except medically). If you smoke pot-illegal-always!
If I had a beer last night - legal .now if I' m an alcolholic-that's a different story. It's like the speeders,etc. that get caught on camera and are sent fines. They bitch and moan and complain. All they have to do is follow the speed limits and traffic laws. Cameras don't bother me at all. Either do the drug laws. Having said that, Chuck Schmers an anti-gun orifice who needs to be fought every step.Can't let him get his foot in the door! Language, tut tut GEM Last edited by Glenn E. Meyer; January 21, 2011 at 04:21 PM. Reason: bad words |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|