The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Gear and Accessories

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 10, 2009, 09:23 AM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: July 8, 2009
Location: davison, michigan
Posts: 661
Burris Scopes...any respect?

Just wondering about people's opinion. It would seem that Leupold, Bushnell, And Nikon all get their due but, Burris not so much. I really took a look at Burris after my good friend got one. I know he's the type to do his homework as he is an extremely anal retentive die maker by trade. Long story short, I bought a Burris Signature Select 3-10x40mm with a ballistic plex. I'll tell you the reasons for my decision later in the thread. Just throwing it out there....and begin.
.284 is offline  
Old July 10, 2009, 09:40 AM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Location: Mississippi/Texas
Posts: 2,503
I have several Leupolds, a Nikon, and a Burris. The Burris is, in my opinion, every bit as good as a VXII Leupold or Nikon.
"Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress, but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
publius is offline  
Old July 10, 2009, 09:50 AM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,531
I have Publius' exact same spread and I agree. Don't let the smaller price tag fool you - Burris makes great optics.
bclark1 is offline  
Old July 10, 2009, 10:49 AM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 18, 1999
Location: Hemet (middle of nowhere) California
Posts: 4,261
I like their Signature Select and XTR series scopes. What bothers some people is that its ocular rotates when you zoom the scope. If you're addicted to flip up covers that's a problem.

Burris XTR 1-4x24 Tactical on my MK68 Recon.

Burris Signature Select 3-10x40 on one of my Tikka T3 Lites.
Proud Life Member: National Rifle Association, California Rifle & Pistol Association, and the Second Amendment Foundation.
Annual Member: Revolutionary War Veterans Association (Project Appleseed) and the Madison Society.
sholling is offline  
Old July 11, 2009, 12:53 AM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2006
Location: Body: Clarkston, Washington. Soul: LaCrosse, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,558
I looked at both a Burris and a Leupold for my Rem M1903 and picked the Burris glass over the Leupold. Cash was not an issue on either. Still happy with my choice.
- Jon
Disequilibrium facilitates accommodation.
9mm vs .45 ACP? The answer is .429
WeedWacker is offline  
Old July 11, 2009, 01:19 AM   #6
Senior Member
Join Date: January 19, 2009
Location: Wherever I may roam
Posts: 1,492
What bothers some people is that its ocular rotates when you zoom the scope. If you're addicted to flip up covers that's a problem.
I agree.... that's the reason I only used their 2-7x35 on my varmint rifle where it will never be taken off 3x. If it wasn't for that I'd probably have more Burris scopes.

This is a Burris XTS-135 Red Dot and a Burris FullField II 2-7x35. Had a FullField II 3-9x40 on a 30-06, held zero very well. I think they're a very good value but I'm not a fan of the rotating ocular for zoom.
riggins_83 is offline  
Old July 11, 2009, 09:07 AM   #7
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2008
Location: Puget Sound Washington
Posts: 1,553
I have a Fullfield 2 and like it about as well as my Leupold VXIII as far as optical quality goes.
"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." The Dalai Llama (5/15/01, The Seattle Times)
"That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there." George Orwell
Inspector3711 is offline  
Old July 11, 2009, 12:11 PM   #8
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 13,001
US-made Burris scopes are excellent, foreign-made Burris scopes are a mixed lot. If it is a foreign-made Burris, Japanese is best, China and Phillipines are only so-so.
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Taylor Machine
Scorch is offline  
Old July 11, 2009, 02:56 PM   #9
Senior Member
Join Date: January 11, 2008
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 441
When the oldest gunmaker in the world sought to buy the best scope company in the US...they sent a team of engineers and looked at everything.

Their lenses transmit light better than Leupold and their lifetime warranty and service is first rate.

That's why BURRIS is now OWNED by BERETTA !

They are a first class company with fine products and service based on my sales of them since 1991 .
oldcspsarge is offline  
Old July 11, 2009, 07:39 PM   #10
Senior Member
Join Date: December 22, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,222
Burris scopes:

I like the older mode Burris scopes. Great light gathering glass and very clear and durable. Signature models were super. Really don't care for the brand new versions myself. You can still get pretty good deals for the older model Burris scopes on Ebay and Gunbroker. I still have a couple and they work great.
skydiver3346 is offline  
Old July 12, 2009, 07:08 PM   #11
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 2007
Location: Forney, TX
Posts: 725
Burris is best bang for buck.

I have FFII in 3-9x40 and 4.5-14x42 scopes for my 7mm Mag and AR-15. I got the 3-9 with the binocs deal, and the 4.5-14 with the spotting scope deal.

I put the quick release Burris rings on so I can use the iron sights as well. I wouldn't try shooting a cigarette out of someone's mouth, but they are somewhat repeatable.

My brother picked up a 4.5-14 after having issues with several Cabela's scopes in same price range. He loves his.

Having power ring and aperture adjustment on the tube makes the flip-up scope covers a PITA. But I still bought them and used them. The Black Diamond has side focus and power ring.

I think the Nikon is comparable, but I like the Burris reticles better.

The Burris Ballistic Plex, similar to Zeiss and Swarovski hunting reticles, is great for hunting.

I don't get into the tacky "White Out" lettering of the Burris and Pentax. The Pentax has a Ballistic Plex offering whereas the Burris is only fine plex and mil-dot.

Black Diamond fine plex 8-32x is on the wish list for target shooting. It's comparable to the Nightforce BR, Zeiss Conquest and Leupold Mk IV. Bushell 6500 series only has 1/4 MOA adjustments, but is similar in price to the Black Diamond. One complaint is the range of adjustment is not as wide as more expensive models, but remedied with a 20 or 30 MOA mount.
When all is said and done, there is a lot more said than done.
ForneyRider is offline  
Old July 12, 2009, 07:21 PM   #12
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 2007
Location: Forney, TX
Posts: 725
When all is said and done, there is a lot more said than done.

Last edited by ForneyRider; July 12, 2009 at 07:22 PM. Reason: dupe.
ForneyRider is offline  
Old July 13, 2009, 11:13 AM   #13
Senior Member
Join Date: July 8, 2009
Location: davison, michigan
Posts: 661
The reasons

I said that I would give my reasons for going with the Burris and I'm a man of my words. First, the only thing I didn't like was the variable power adjustment that make it nearly impossible to use flip cap lens covers. What I do like is the price compared to Leupold, Nikon, and Bushnell. I like the glass, the quad seal design, and the ballistic plex. But, most of all, I like that it's made in the good old USA. It is sad that to compete, they had to start producing the Fullfield models over seas.
.284 is offline  
Old July 13, 2009, 08:29 PM   #14
Junior member
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
I have an older Burris 6X fixed power compact scope. I prefer the fixed powers, less to go wrong.....hard to find 6 and 8x fixed powers anymore
oneounceload is offline  
Old July 14, 2009, 09:03 AM   #15
Join Date: March 14, 2009
Location: WA
Posts: 63
I have a Burris FF II 2-7x 35mm, I was in a shop comparing FF II 3-9x with equivalent from Leupold and Nikon. It is just as good for less $$$, I like the B.Plex better and I wish it does not rotate when zoom.

Came across someone selling a "never-used" 2-7x Camo for just $140, went with it and I can't be happier.
WagonM is offline  
Old July 16, 2009, 08:03 PM   #16
Join Date: July 13, 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 35
Burris, Nikon and Leupold are similar in quality (for the price you pay). For example a Nikon Prostaff is comparable to a Leupold VX1 they actually have the same glass (Leupold doesn't make their own glass). All three have a good reputation for standing behind their products. All three are durable. If your scope is clear and crisp (every scopemaker has an occasional lemon), and you like the reticle then you made a good buy!
As long as your happy with it don't worry about everyone else's opinion (unless they show you a scope that is far superior and you see it with your own eyes).

Anyway don't second guess yourself, you have a nice scope!
big26john is offline  
Old July 17, 2009, 02:46 PM   #17
Join Date: April 9, 2009
Posts: 20
Im using a Burris 3.5-10x50mm Fullfield and it added at least 10 minutes to my dawn and dusk shooting. Great low light scope
davebig is offline  
Old July 22, 2009, 08:43 PM   #18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2009
Location: Auckland NewZealand
Posts: 350
Burris Scopes

I have a Burris Fullfield 11 6.5-20 X 50 and it is superior to my Leupold vx11 6-18x40
The target image is brighter which you would expect but also in the Burris 224 bullet holes are visible at two hundred and fifty yards, my Leupold can't even see them at two hundred. My shooting partner used to only use two brands of scope Swarovsky and Leupold but after comparing my scope to his leupolds his latest varmint rifle now wears a Burris identical to mine.
kiwi56 is offline  
Old July 23, 2009, 10:10 PM   #19
Senior Member
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 11,086
My good buddy has Burris scopes on two of his rifles and I like them a lot.

I don't have any rifles... well, any worthy rifles... But I -REALLY- want the Burris 12x handgun scope for my 14" .223 Contender, but I can't get past the price.

Does anyone know of another maker of a handgun scope that does long eye relief and 12x, or more?

I want to shoot half inch groups at 100 yards but at 6x, I just don't have the magnification I want.
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss.
Sevens is offline  
Old July 26, 2009, 03:14 PM   #20
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 2007
Location: Forney, TX
Posts: 725
I had a Burris 4x on my Ruger BlackHawk for a while. The B-square mount couldn't stay put so I took it off. I picked up the Burris for 180$ with rings used at a gun show.

Leupold, Nikon, Simmons and a few others make pistol scopes. I like the 20in of eye relief of my Burris.
When all is said and done, there is a lot more said than done.
ForneyRider is offline  
Old November 20, 2013, 12:53 AM   #21
Junior Member
Join Date: November 9, 2013
Posts: 8
Burris hand gun scope

i have an older Model 7x IER Handgun scope mounted on my T/C super 14 gun. I am looking to put a sun shade on the end of this scope put cannot find a part number for it.
COYOTE165 is offline  
Old November 20, 2013, 08:38 AM   #22
Senior Member
Join Date: April 30, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,931
My Mini-14 is topped with a Burris Timberline 2-7x28 scope that is very compact and works perfectly with that rifle.
skoro is offline  
Old November 20, 2013, 08:57 AM   #23
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2013
Location: NC
Posts: 545
I have a bunch of Leupold on rifles (I love them all) and two burris scopes on pistols. One is an older burris fixed power (4x) and I don't like it. It's to fussy on eye relief for my old eyes. The other is one of the newer Burris pistol scopes (2x7x) and it's on a TC contender and I could not imagine a better setup.
eldermike is offline  
Old November 20, 2013, 09:05 AM   #24
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 2,268
Burris makes excellent optics. Their MTAC line is one of my favorites and the "new" line for 2014 promises to be even better.
Good Shooting, MarkCO
MarkCO is offline  
Old November 20, 2013, 11:51 AM   #25
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Western Colorado, finally.
Posts: 19,118
4+ Year old thread bumped for complaint.
Still happily answering to the call-sign Peetza.
The problem, as you so eloquently put it, is choice.
-The Architect
He is no fool who gives what he can not keep to gain what he can not lose.
-Jim Eliott, paraphrasing Philip Henry.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent:
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.16642 seconds with 7 queries