The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 13, 2009, 04:51 PM   #1
Bartholomew Roberts
Senior Member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 6,889
Federal District Court rules 2nd Amendment is protected liberty interest under 5th

A magistrate judge for the Southern District of New York has found 18 U.S.C. ยง 3142(c)(1)(B) unconstitutional. This law requires that someone who is charged with possession of child pornography be required to surrender all firearms without any hearing in order to be eligible for bail.

The judge ruled that as a fundamental liberty interest, the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms cannot be removed without due process, which means a defendant must receive a hearing before he can be deprived of his right to bear arms during the trial.

You can read more about U. S. vs. Arzberger at the Volokh Conspiracy (and there are quite a few tidbits of recent analysis on Heller in addition to this particular story as well).
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
Old January 13, 2009, 04:58 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: June 19, 2005
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,482
Wow, cool Thread, Bart. I'll have to check out the links later. Thanks for posting them!
Fremmer is offline  
Old January 13, 2009, 08:52 PM   #3
Gary L. Griffiths
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2000
Location: AZ, WA
Posts: 1,412
As always, Bartholomew Roberts posts some great material.

A quick reading of Arzberger seems to indicate that the Lautenberg Amendment may be on the short road to the dustbin of history.
Violence is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and valorous feeling which believes that nothing is worth violence is much worse. Those who have nothing for which they are willing to fight; nothing they care about more than their own personal safety; are miserable creatures who have no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of those better than themselves. Gary L. Griffiths, Chief Instructor, Advanced Force Tactics, Inc. (Paraphrasing John Stuart Mill)
Gary L. Griffiths is offline  
Old January 13, 2009, 10:39 PM   #4
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
Its a ruling from a magistrate and has no precendential effect...but interesting

WildbutwhatwillthedistrictcourtsayAlaska TM
Wildalaska is offline  
Old January 13, 2009, 11:32 PM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,598
Wild is right, but as always, lawyers can still cite it.
$0 of an NRA membership goes to legislative action or court battles. Not a dime. Only money contributed to the NRA-ILA or NRA-PVF. Second Amendment Foundation is a solid alternative.
First Shotgun Thread First Rifle Thread First Pistol Thread
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old January 14, 2009, 12:06 AM   #6
Al Norris
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,549
Violation of Due Process... It may only be a magistrate court. But big things are built from small starts.
Al Norris is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2017 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent:
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.05228 seconds with 7 queries