The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 10, 2007, 08:08 PM   #1
BikerRN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 11, 2007
Location: "State of Discombobulation"
Posts: 1,333
Desert Warrior

OK Gang, give me the good, bad and the ugly about the Kimber Desert Warrior. I'm seriously looking at one.

I've had 1911's through the years, but I'm more of a revolver guy. At work I carry the issued "bottomfeeder" and own a couple of "bottomfeeders" but really prefer the round cylinder things.

I'm thinking of using this as a "Tacticool" Pistol at the range and when I'm out plinking in the desert or 4x4'ing just for looks. I will of course have a round gun on me as well.

Biker
BikerRN is offline  
Old November 10, 2007, 09:03 PM   #2
DonR101395
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 30, 2005
Location: NWFL
Posts: 3,029
After shooting one a few weeks ago side by side a SA Operator. I prefered the Operator; other than the name:barf:
The SA had a better trigger and in my opinion was fit together a little better. Accuracy on both was pretty equal.
DonR101395 is offline  
Old November 10, 2007, 10:07 PM   #3
Sturmgewehre
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 4,212
Another vote for Springfield TRP or Operator. The quality at Kimber is hit or miss.
__________________
Visit my YouTube channel for reviews, tests and more.
Ex Mea Sententia
Sturmgewehre is offline  
Old November 11, 2007, 12:15 AM   #4
StrawDog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 27, 2005
Posts: 157
+1 on the kimber being hit or miss

I own a ss target that shoots well but loose....

Other reviews are mixed, some good some bad. A lot of problems with clips
StrawDog is offline  
Old November 11, 2007, 04:51 AM   #5
Rob96
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31, 1999
Location: Allentown,PA
Posts: 1,951
Go with a Springfield Operator. Several 1911'smiths who also happen to be SWAT team members , Larry Vickers and others have stated this pistol is not good to go out of the box. I have read several problems as far sa reliability with this gun. I also have experience with 3 different Kimbers, all of which suffered reliability problems.
Rob96 is offline  
Old November 11, 2007, 05:16 AM   #6
The Body Bagger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 27, 2004
Posts: 818
A recent officer in the last academy had multiple FTF's and FTE's even after shooting 1K rnds at the end of the week. As others have said, I would go with an Operator.
__________________
Rock Out With Your Glock Out
The Body Bagger is offline  
Old November 11, 2007, 10:44 AM   #7
Red Pepper
Junior Member
 
Join Date: August 2, 2007
Posts: 6
I would read this on the 10-8 forum before purchasing a Desert Warrior:

http://www.10-8forums.com/ubbthreads...0&page=0#56857
Red Pepper is offline  
Old November 11, 2007, 10:56 AM   #8
HorseSoldier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: OCONUS 61°13′06″N 149°53′57″W
Posts: 2,282
I own one, and apparently got the only good one Kimber ever made



Mine has run with zero issues at all specific to the gun. Had a bad CMC magazine that does not run right in it or in the Colt and Springfield pistols I've tried it in as well. Otherwise, solid performer. Great trigger out of the box, extremely reliable (and no 500 round break in period or whatever), and extremely good accuracy. Eats FMJ and JHP without issues. No downside I can see except the price tag.
HorseSoldier is offline  
Old November 11, 2007, 12:25 PM   #9
Ala Dan
Member in memoriam
 
Join Date: August 13, 1999
Location: In The HOT, Humid, and Mu
Posts: 6,116
Bad: Its a Kimber, and not the quality that everyone expects from a firearm
costing over $1-K~! I would much prefer the Springfield Operator.
Ala Dan is offline  
Old November 11, 2007, 03:27 PM   #10
Rob96
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31, 1999
Location: Allentown,PA
Posts: 1,951
Quote:
I own one, and apparently got the only good one Kimber ever made
Consider yourself lucky. I truly believe Kimber chooses to spend more on marketing than QC.
Rob96 is offline  
Old November 11, 2007, 05:46 PM   #11
Jart
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 2001
Location: Grand Prairie, TX
Posts: 1,647
Quote:
I'm thinking of using this as a "Tacticool" Pistol at the range and when I'm out plinking in the desert or 4x4'ing just for looks.
Given that specific criteria, the Desert Warrior may prove a good choice. I believe it's both full-sized and is unburdened by type II parts. After my issues with type II parts, shattering safeties and factory attitude, I won't own a Kimber for use as a weapon. Range toys and plinkers are another matter. They seem to offer a lot of bling for not a lot of money. Product failure is rarely more than an inconvenience under the circumstances you describe.
Jart is offline  
Old November 11, 2007, 11:26 PM   #12
BikerRN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 11, 2007
Location: "State of Discombobulation"
Posts: 1,333
Thanks for the info gang.

If anyone else wants to add their $0.02, please feel free.

Biker
BikerRN is offline  
Old November 12, 2007, 12:46 PM   #13
Billy Sparks
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 1999
Location: Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Posts: 745
I had one and it was the only Kimber I had that feed and ejected 100% from day one. Of course mine did not have that funky Schwartz[sp] trigger safety.
Billy Sparks is offline  
Old November 12, 2007, 10:30 PM   #14
HorseSoldier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: OCONUS 61°13′06″N 149°53′57″W
Posts: 2,282
If I'm not mistaken, neither the Warrior or the Desert Warrior have the Schwartz safety except for occasional production runs done specifically for sales outside the United States (i.e. California ).

Springfield 1911s are about the best pistols made in Brazil these days, so I wouldn't rule them out
HorseSoldier is offline  
Old November 12, 2007, 11:55 PM   #15
sholling
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 1999
Location: Hemet (middle of nowhere) California
Posts: 4,261
The Kimber Warriors that I've molested in the store had much better triggers than any Springer that I've played with - including the TRP. And I own both Springer and Kimber and I'm a fan of both. I just don't like the pimp looks of Warrior. My next 1911 will be a S&W SW1911, or the pricey PC1911 if I ever win the lottery.
__________________
Proud Life Member: National Rifle Association, California Rifle & Pistol Association, and the Second Amendment Foundation.
Annual Member: Revolutionary War Veterans Association (Project Appleseed) and the Madison Society.
sholling is offline  
Old November 13, 2007, 12:08 AM   #16
odsixer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2007
Location: great white north
Posts: 316
I have an eclipse and it's great, not as tacticool but a very pretty weapon
odsixer is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06553 seconds with 7 queries