The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Harley Nolden Memorial Institute for Firearms Research

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 15, 2007, 03:11 PM   #1
PKAY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 1999
Location: L.A., CA, USA
Posts: 911
Lee Enfield Question

Sorry, I posted to the wrong forum. I have moved it appropriately.


My uncle passed away earlier this year and left my aunt with some interesting pieces from the back of a hallway closet: 1) a Colt New Line revolver 2nd Model (~1882); 2) a Marlin Model 39 with octagon bbl. and case hardened receiver (~1938), and 3) a No. 1 Mark III SMLE battle rifle manufactured by Lithgow (Australia) in 1940. This last piece has seen some battlefield use I reckon. However, the stock fore end (original to the piece) appears to have been cut back around 9.75" giving a "semi-sporterized" look to the gun but retaining the forward stock clamp. I have not been able to find any photos of this configuration on the web, so I am assuming someone "cut it back". Everything else looks right. Any opinion on this configuration? Did the Aussies modify these weapons? The job appears to have been done reasonably well.
__________________
Safe shooting - PKAY
PKAY is offline  
Old October 20, 2007, 02:32 PM   #2
fal308
Staff Alumnus
 
Join Date: October 12, 1998
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,992
I've never heard of a factory cutdown. Sounds as though it was sporterized.
http://www.britishbitsnbobs.com/ has quite a few reference books on the Enfields and a couple on Australian guns in particular.
fal308 is offline  
Old October 20, 2007, 03:00 PM   #3
PKAY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 1999
Location: L.A., CA, USA
Posts: 911
Thanks, fal308. I sent off an email to G. Greg Young, the site owner, to see if he might have any info on this matter. My sense is that someone simply altered the fore end of the original stock to give the rifle more of a "hunting rifle" appearance as opposed to military battle rifle. Interesting, though, the butt stock retains the original cartouche and mfg. date. In addition, I might add, the top of the butt stock has "notches" cut into the wood. Don't know if these originally signified battlefield "kills" or game successes.
__________________
Safe shooting - PKAY
PKAY is offline  
Old October 20, 2007, 05:22 PM   #4
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
That kind of "hacksaw sporterizing" was done to millions of surplus rifles from the end of WWII right up to today. Now, though, folks recognize the historical value of those rifles and most try to keep them intact, but when they were all of $9.95 mail order, they were simply a cheap deer rifle and the foreend represented needless weight and bulk.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old October 20, 2007, 09:36 PM   #5
PKAY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 1999
Location: L.A., CA, USA
Posts: 911
Thanks, Jim. I suspected as much. Too weird to be a military "thang" if you get my drift. Too bad too. Has the magazine cut-off and the whole 9 yards.
__________________
Safe shooting - PKAY
PKAY is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.04239 seconds with 7 queries