The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

View Poll Results: Will you consider buying Taurus instead of other makes?
Yes 92 55.09%
No 75 44.91%
Voters: 167. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 11, 2007, 11:34 AM   #1
OneShotOnly!
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 28, 2007
Location: Next door
Posts: 161
Would you consider buying Taurus?

Would consider buying Taurus .375 or .44 Magnum instead of SW, Colt or Ruger, or other makes? Budget and availabliliy is not considered.
OneShotOnly! is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 11:54 AM   #2
YosemiteSam357
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 8, 2002
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 231
Yes. I own (2) Taurii, (3) S&W, and (2) Ruger Bisley SAs. When I bought my last revolver it was a Taurus, a 44SS4 .44 Mag.

Taurus makes some innovative products you can't get from other manufacturers, as well as being a good value compared to S&W, imo. I did have one bad experience with a Taurus, an M94 .22 revolver. Horrid trigger and adjustable sights that would not stay put, and it could not be made better. Others have complained about the same things on the same gun. It's almost as if these .22s are made in a different factory with different QC goals.

The above is my opinion on their revolvers only. I'm not a big fan of their semi autos by any means. I've never handled one that didn't feel cheap and chintzy.

-- Sam

P.S. Edited to add, this is always a lively topic. You might search around and see what others have said. It's never going to change. Some people love them, some hate them.
YosemiteSam357 is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 11:58 AM   #3
john in jax
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 11, 2005
Posts: 1,177
If you were talking semi-auto's I would have voted "yes" in a heartbeat, but I've been VERY dissapointed in the Taurus revolvers I've owned. Maybe it's just me but I've had had 2 Taurus .44mags that wore out / got so loose in somewhere around 1,000 rounds or less that I was afraid to shoot them.

Get a Ruger .44mag and it will last you a lifetime and still have plenty of life left when you hand it down to your kids.
__________________
America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards. Claire Wolfe
john in jax is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 12:13 PM   #4
Johnywinslow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2007
Posts: 131
I realy want a tuarus 608 4inch,
Johnywinslow is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 12:16 PM   #5
wdelack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 27, 2005
Location: Houston, TX.
Posts: 439
I would agree with YosemiteSam357's assessment of the Taurus M94. It sound's like he was describing the one I have. Because of my experience with the M94, I never find myself looking at Taurus as an option when shopping for a new or used revolver or pistol. I still don't rule out the possibility of owning another Taurus but there are just soooo many other choices.

WD
wdelack is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 12:27 PM   #6
azsixshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 22, 2007
Location: Pinckney, MI
Posts: 657
No, I would never buy a sidearm with an internal lock unless it was strictly optional. Don't buy one unless they offer a non-internal lock model. If you want an internal lock, fine by me...as long as they give you a choice in the matter. Otherwise [unnecessary stuff redacted -Tam] and join the anti-gun libs because your purchase only serves as a vote for the liberal left.
__________________
"Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We're evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that." --Saul Tigh
http://sargesrollcall.blogspot.com/2...s-no-more.html

Last edited by Tamara; June 16, 2007 at 04:11 PM. Reason: Low road commentary edited out.
azsixshooter is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 12:29 PM   #7
dyoun06
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 21, 2007
Posts: 133
Ruger or S&W

If money is not the issue go for the better quality and value. If you decide to sell the gun down the road you have a much better chance of getting your money back.
dyoun06 is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 01:13 PM   #8
Wildalaska
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
Friends donmt let friends buy Taurus.

WildblehAlaska
Wildalaska is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 01:28 PM   #9
Jkwas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Location: Mouth of the Rat, Florida
Posts: 1,778
YES! Their guns work perfectly fine.
__________________
I grew up in New Jersey, but later moved to Florida and made a complete recovery.
Keltec: The BIC lighter of handguns
http://jkwasblog.blogspot.com/
Jkwas is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 01:57 PM   #10
meanoldman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2000
Posts: 218
nope
meanoldman is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 02:00 PM   #11
jhgreasemonkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 2,238
I think the raging bull is an attractive gun. I chose a ruger redhawk when i was in the market for one and dont regret it. But someday maby I will have a raging bull as well. The one I shot was pretty decent.
jhgreasemonkey is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 03:20 PM   #12
darko
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 25, 2007
Posts: 499
I've owned a couple of Taurus's in my day. The last one I bought was a compact 45. After my experience with that last one I would not buy another Taurus. I still look at them from time to time but when it comes to dropping the coin I'll spend a little more for the better craftsmanship of some of the other makes.
darko is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 03:31 PM   #13
The Real Wyatt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2006
Location: South Central KY
Posts: 339
I own several Taurus handguns and each performs quite well. I own Rugers and Smiths also.

My most accurate revolver MIGHT be my Taurus 970 .22 LR or it MIGHT be my Ruger Redhawk .45 Colt. They're extremely close in accuracy. Accurate enough that I wouldn't hesitate to take a head shot on a groundhog at 50 yards with either gun. I wouldn't do that with any of the other revolvers I own.

I'm headed up to Winchester Kentucky tomorrow on business. When I finish up there I'm gonna make a run up to Bud's gunshop in Paris and by me another Taurus revolver.
The Real Wyatt is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 03:37 PM   #14
Scorpion
Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2002
Location: Las Vegas, Nv.
Posts: 42
With so many high quality firearms to choose from and money a consideration or not. I would opt for a S&W, Colt, Ruger in revolvers and Springfield, Kimber, Walther, BHP in semi auto's. It's a personel preference only and has nothing to do with the quality of the Taurus line.

RC
Scorpion is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 03:45 PM   #15
Black Adder LXX
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 25, 2007
Location: The DEEP South
Posts: 293
For the revolver, I said no b/c I love Rugers, and no internal lock is a big plus for me.
__________________
"In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress." - John Adams
Black Adder LXX is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 03:59 PM   #16
tuckerdog1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 20, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 275
Cost not being an issue, I'd probably buy one of the others. But I'd give Taurus a fair look.

Tuckerdog1
__________________
Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the
black flag, and begin slitting throats. - Henry Louis Mencken
tuckerdog1 is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 06:34 PM   #17
normal
Member
 
Join Date: June 10, 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 54
I currently own 2 Taurus revolvers and my father has 2 and I would not hesitate to buy another. They are very well made and reliable. If there is a difference in quality, it sure is not enough of a difference to justify the price difference.
normal is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 07:01 PM   #18
Taurus_9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2006
Location: Louisville, Kentucky USA
Posts: 963
Of course. I'm a Taurus (and Ruger) fan.
Taurus_9mm is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 07:08 PM   #19
Don Lu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 271
Yes, I own both and cannot say anything bad about Taurus....Even more than that, I dont see any difference in quality or performance.
__________________
GLOCK 23,Smith & Wesson New 520,Tuarus 651,Taurus 608,Taurus PT92,
Astra A-75,CZ-52,East German Makarov,Mossberg 835 Ulti Mag, Remington 870 Express Magnum
Don Lu is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 07:18 PM   #20
DonR101395
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 30, 2005
Location: NWFL
Posts: 3,029
My wife had one and it worked fine. I would consider it, I don't know if I would though.


BTW: Are you going for some kind of world record for the highest number of polls started by a single person in a year?
DonR101395 is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 07:36 PM   #21
IM_Lugger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 27, 2004
Posts: 2,011
Quote:
Would consider buying Taurus .375 or .44 Magnum instead of SW
I voted YES, because I bought a Raging Bull (.44) after handling S&W 629
__________________
"I feel the Beretta is a great character, it's so strong and elegant. The other guns look dumb to me." - John Woo
IM_Lugger is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 07:53 PM   #22
clayking
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 29, 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 796
A Taurus over a Colt, surely, you jest..........................ck
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
clayking is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 08:20 PM   #23
RsqVet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Posts: 2,474
No, unless there were absulutley no other options.
RsqVet is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 08:23 PM   #24
wolverine350
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 27, 2006
Location: ponca city ok
Posts: 746
Taurus steel is barazilian made and is softer steel than the american counterparts, thats why i prefer american made
__________________
CVA Kodiak Magnum .50 cal
Marlin 981T 22LR Bolt Action
Remington 770 Bolt Action 270
Thompson Center Encore 243
wolverine350 is offline  
Old June 11, 2007, 09:48 PM   #25
ShipWreck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 9, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,744
No, no, no, no, no,no, no,no, no,no, no,no, no,no, no,no, no,no, no,no, no,no, no,no, no NO

OTHERWISE, this will be you

ShipWreck is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2020 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10386 seconds with 8 queries