The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Firing Line Gun Show > Retail Deals and Feedback


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 23, 2007, 11:27 PM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2007
Posts: 1,506
Glock Mandates and Enforces Minimum Advertising Price (MAP) Policy

Does anyone know about "Glock's new Minimum Advertising Price (MAP) Policy?

Sites like Glockworld and Topglock very recently listed prices on all guns. Really good deals! One example - G19 just $459 (free shipping and no sales tax, depending upon state of purchase on topglock).

Now, apparently, they can't list their low prices on-line. Perhaps they could list prices if they were higher?

Now customers must call the on-line vendors (listed above) to obtain their best sale prices.

What's going on? Are bricks and mortar dealers swaying Glock to level the playing field at customers' expense?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
Knowledge is not power. Applied knowledge is power!
allenomics is offline  
Old January 24, 2007, 12:48 AM   #2
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 21,028
I've run into this several times with various products. Last one like this I remember was a knife dealer who couldn't print or advertise his Spyderco prices online because they were lower than Spyderco allowed.

Just a manufacturer trying to take care of its dealers.

You can still get the low prices, but the smaller volume dealers have a little better chance of competing.
Did you know that there is a TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old January 24, 2007, 12:59 PM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 18, 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 146
I agree...probably just a way for the manufacturer to protect the brick and mortar shop (with overhead) from some of the low-ball internet-only bottom feeders that seem to be popping up from everywhere nowadays. While I also like a great deal, I think it's good that they are trying to protect the established physical gunshop. I still want to be able to go down to the shop, handle the firearms, get some smithy work done, and buy from them when able....the last thing I want to see is only the internet sales available, and no more mom-pop gunshop .
These types of business have supported firearms companies for years, and it's time they supported them back.
"Government is not a solution to our problem, government is the problem" - Ronald Reagan
pwelsh4hd is offline  
Old January 24, 2007, 03:14 PM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2005
Posts: 3,733
It is not in the firearms industry alone. I have seen the same policy with minature hobby equipment. On line dealers were advertising at 20%+ off of what a brick and mortar store could sell and the manufacturer realizes that the life of their product depends on an actuall shelf presence at brick and mortat shops. What they do is make it a requirement of doing business with them that dealers NOT advertise lower prices on line. Violate the policy and they are cut off.

It makes sense and Glock is just trying to help out the dealers who brought them to the dance.
"Religions are all alike - founded upon fables and mythologies." Thomas Jefferson

"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin
Musketeer is offline  
Old January 25, 2007, 12:16 PM   #5
Junior member
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: The Toll Road State, U.S.A.
Posts: 12,451
Not uncommon

Happens a lot. cannot print it's zeiss conquest prices, for example.
FirstFreedom is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2017 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent:
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.05462 seconds with 7 queries