The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 9, 2006, 08:06 PM   #1
expeditionx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2004
Posts: 330
Benelli magazine extensions are illegal-ATF letter

http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=6&f=1&t=177741


Dear Mr. *****:

This refers to your letter of September 21, 2004, to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), in which you ask about adding a telescoping stock and a magazine extension to a Benelli M1014 shotgun.

A shotgun with a telescoping stock or a magazine greater than 5 rounds is prohibited from importation into the United States under the provisions of section 925(d)(3) of Title 18, United states code (U.S.C.). Assembly of such a shotgun from imported parts is prohibited under 18, U.S.C. Section 922(r). The implementing regulations in Title 27, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 478, Section 478.39 (formerly Part 178, Section 178.39) prohibit assembly of such a shotgun that contains more than 10 of the imported parts listed in paragraph (c) of the regulation. Please see the enclosed brochure for further information. Assembly of such a shotgun using 10 or less of the listed import parts is not prohibited. The shotgun is also subject to whatever State laws and local ordinances may apply.

We thank you for your inquiry and trust that the foregoing has been responsive to your request.

Sincerely yours,

(signed)
John A. Spurgeon
Chief, Firearms Programs Division

The brochure contains the following:

(c) For purposes of this section, the imported parts are:

1. Frames, receivers, receiver castings, forgings, or stampings.
2. Barrels
3. Barrel extensions
4. mounting blocks (trunnions)
5. Muzzle attachments
6. Bolts
7. Bolt carriers
8. Operating rods
9. gas pistons
10. Trigger housings
11. triggers
12. Hammers
13. Sears
14. Disconnectors
15. Buttstocks
16. Pistol grips
17. Forearms, handguards
18. Magazine bodies
19. Followers
20. Floorplates
expeditionx is offline  
Old April 9, 2006, 09:16 PM   #2
RedPhnx
Member
 
Join Date: February 5, 2005
Location: Granite City, IL
Posts: 86
I could be wrong but wasn't this part of the assault weapons ban that is no longer in affect?
RedPhnx is offline  
Old April 9, 2006, 09:31 PM   #3
Ben Swenson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2000
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,210
Quote:
I could be wrong but wasn't this part of the assault weapons ban that is no longer in affect?
Nope.

Import ban. Different critter.
__________________
News, opinion, pictures and more.
(formerly known as Cordex)
Ben Swenson is offline  
Old April 9, 2006, 09:52 PM   #4
expeditionx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2004
Posts: 330
letter of September 21, 2004

assult weapon ban sunset provision ended sept 13, 2004 the letter was written after the sunset so they answer way after sept 13 2004

The 922 r law is from Nov 1990 way before the 1994 assult weapon ban.
922 r has not sunset and wont ever.
expeditionx is offline  
Old April 10, 2006, 03:46 PM   #5
FirstFreedom
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: The Toll Road State, U.S.A.
Posts: 12,451
time to swap out some parts. Expedition, can you tell me how many parts am I gonna have to swap out on my Saiga-12 (when I get it) to use the 10 rd and up mags produced in the US? The US mag itself "un-does" 4 parts - body, floorplate, follower, & spring....then what?
FirstFreedom is offline  
Old April 10, 2006, 03:50 PM   #6
cslinger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 14, 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,838
Should only apply to the semi autos if I am correct, pump guns do not fall under this.

Chris
__________________
"Is there anyway I can write my local gun store off on my taxes as dependents?"
cslinger is offline  
Old April 10, 2006, 04:22 PM   #7
expeditionx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2004
Posts: 330
http://www.concentric.net/~Ldrennan/page12.html
link shows an ATF letter that points to 13 factory control parts
If you plan on converting it to pistol grip, swap out the trigger group with a
single hook G2 trigger group and use a U.S. made pistol grip.
http://www.tapco.com/product_list.asp?dept=15&last=39

If you dont want to convert it, the U.S. made mags equal 3 compliance parts
,and, therefore, by inserting a U.S. made 10 rounder the shotgun would total out to 10 foreign parts so that would still be compliant.

Quote
Should only apply to the semi autos if I am correct, pump guns do not fall under this.
I would have thought so too, but somehow they dont see it that way.
The letter states "A shotgun with" leaving out semiauto implying any shotgun.
It is apparent that you never see a pumpaction shotgun imported with more than a 5 round magazine capacity.
Benelli would love to sell their Nova with an extension legally if they could to civilians. They are competing with remington's 18.5 inch barreled home defense shotgun (express or marine magnum) that can legally hold 6 rounds
it would be an advantage to sell a nova with more capacity.
A call to Benelli a while back confirmed they cant legally sell them like that.
Yep, its a stupid law. To get around the import law you can register your Nova as a NFA weapon (short barrel) with the ATF.
expeditionx is offline  
Old April 10, 2006, 04:31 PM   #8
cslinger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 14, 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,838
Ok I am not up on my legalize but I pulled this from the 922 code. It pretty much in black and white exempts pump action firearms.

Paragraph (1) shall not apply to—
(A) any of the firearms, or replicas or duplicates of the firearms, specified in Appendix A to this section, as such firearms were manufactured on October 1, 1993;
(B) any firearm that—
(i) is manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action;
(ii) has been rendered permanently inoperable; or
(iii) is an antique firearm;
(C) any semiautomatic rifle that cannot accept a detachable magazine that holds more than 5 rounds of ammunition; or
(D) any semiautomatic shotgun that cannot hold more than 5 rounds of ammunition in a fixed or detachable magazine.
__________________
"Is there anyway I can write my local gun store off on my taxes as dependents?"
cslinger is offline  
Old April 10, 2006, 05:45 PM   #9
expeditionx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2004
Posts: 330
http://www.atf.treas.gov/firearms/fe...ok/FEIB-GB.pdf

page 9 of 101 pages
Restricted Importation
Shotguns having a fixed magazine with a capacity of more than 5 cartridges


922 (r)
The Imported Parts Law(1990)
178.39 otherwise known as 922(r) 10 Foreign parts law on semiauto Rifles & Shotguns
http://www.atf.treas.gov/regulations/27cfr178.html
Sec. 178.39 Assembly of semiautomatic rifles or shotguns.
(a) No person shall assemble a semiautomatic rifle or any shotgun using more than 10 of the imported parts listed in paragraph (c) of this section if the assembled firearm is prohibited from importation under section 925(d)(3) as not being particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes.

This has been extended to pump action shotguns. If they cant be imported like that then they cant also be created on U.S. soil from more than 10 foreign parts.
To the ATF reconfiguring equals assembling.
expeditionx is offline  
Old April 10, 2006, 07:11 PM   #10
Pezo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2005
Location: Vernors and orange barrels.
Posts: 661
This is the stuff that reminds me to vote.
Pezo is offline  
Old April 10, 2006, 09:11 PM   #11
wacki
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 19, 2004
Location: Moving out of Indiana
Posts: 426
lol import ban, this is lip service to the liberals.
wacki is offline  
Old April 11, 2006, 11:05 PM   #12
loosecannon
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Posts: 168
Your thread says:
Quote:
Benelli magazine extensions are illegal-ATF letter
but looking at it I see that only pertains if you add a telescoping stock, so you can have one or the other. It sounds like the BATF is just trying to drum up business for American gun and gun parts manufacturers.
loosecannon is offline  
Old April 11, 2006, 11:45 PM   #13
expeditionx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2004
Posts: 330
telescoping stock or a magazine greater than 5 rounds is prohibited from importation

If you add on a telescoping stock to Benelli= Felony

If you add a magazine extension to increase capacity past 5 rounds=Felony
expeditionx is offline  
Old April 11, 2006, 11:47 PM   #14
expeditionx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2004
Posts: 330
If it could be done legally by Benelli they would have done it.
Too many $ to lose by not configuring them for the tacitical guys.

Unless the ATF changes their policy, you wont be ever seeing a collapsable stock or a magazine greater than 5 rounds on any imported shotgun.
expeditionx is offline  
Old April 12, 2006, 08:34 AM   #15
oletymer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 9, 2005
Posts: 338
Unless you can't shoot worth a damm, why do you need extra capacity?
oletymer is offline  
Old April 12, 2006, 09:08 AM   #16
JohnBrowning
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2005
Posts: 140
"Unless you can't shoot worth a damm, why do you need extra capacity?"

Because you can. Gun ownership in the US is a matter of want, not just need.
JohnBrowning is offline  
Old April 12, 2006, 09:36 AM   #17
oletymer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 9, 2005
Posts: 338
My point is that with few exceptions most of the "give me more rounds" shooters are poorly trained and would be better served by shooting more to gain ability. Just because you can is not a better reason that ability. I wish all shooters would shoot more to gain ability than using more rounds.
oletymer is offline  
Old April 12, 2006, 05:09 PM   #18
wacki
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 19, 2004
Location: Moving out of Indiana
Posts: 426
Quote:
Unless you can't shoot worth a damm, why do you need extra capacity?
Cuz I want to shoot more than 5 clays at a time. There is the home defense argument.
wacki is offline  
Old April 12, 2006, 05:11 PM   #19
wacki
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 19, 2004
Location: Moving out of Indiana
Posts: 426
Quote:
Gun ownership in the US is a matter of want, not just need.
Our founding fathers would disagree.
wacki is offline  
Old April 12, 2006, 05:12 PM   #20
Spahrtan
Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2006
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 86
Sorry to hijack a bit but is adding a forward pistol grip and a knoxx copstock to a chinese import gun illegal? I had never heard about any of this before.
Spahrtan is offline  
Old April 12, 2006, 05:41 PM   #21
expeditionx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2004
Posts: 330
Sorry to hijack a bit but is adding a forward pistol grip and a knoxx copstock to a chinese import gun illegal? I had never heard about any of this before.

Yes because its imported and once againwere talking about import nonsense
that unfortunately can cause a felony charge if it is discovered that you did it.
Adding anything the ATF considers unsporting in connection to prior arrangements with U.S. Attorney Generals makes an imported rifle / shotgun uncompliant. Pistol grips, bayonettes, folding/collapsing stocks, shotgun magazines capacity greater than 5 rounds, and even night sites.
However, if you reduce the total foreign control parts to less than 11 parts you can now have all those features once again. This law has been on the books since about 1990 with a few new modifications since then. The 10 parts rule came in effect in 1993.
The new modifications to the law have been always more restrictive than before.

Example: Up until 1998 semi-auto rifles could have been imported with the ability to use magazines with a capacity greater than 10 rounds.
In 1998, a new Attorney General study of unsporting features led to a new GCA restriction to deny importation of rifles that could use magazines with a higher capacity greater than 10 rounds. The new study caused a loss of a feature for imported rifles. Thank Janet Reno / Bill Clinton for that one.
So currently import determinations are restricted ever so more and will continue to be unless the import law is destroyed. I predict before Guns ever become completely outlawed in America that importers will get to a point where they cant even import any kind of : pump action shotgun, any kind of semi-auto rifle, and no more semi-auto pistols. Domestic made will probably be the last front attacked. Domestics are the only ones heavily protected by
U.S. gun lobby.
Think Im crazy, well its been that same trend since 1990.
Importers have less protection against anti-gun groups than domestics.
If this wasnt so, we would not be having an online discussion right now as to why a simple imported pump action shotgun cant legally have a magazine that can hold over 5 rounds. 30 years ago people would have looked at you crazy if you would have told them that the Federal Government was going to restrict gun freedoms through imports.
expeditionx is offline  
Old April 12, 2006, 06:37 PM   #22
Spahrtan
Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2006
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 86
Wow, thanks for the information. guess i better break my little felony pump gun down, restore it to stock, and sell it. I knew i should have bought a real 870 anyways.
Spahrtan is offline  
Old April 12, 2006, 07:43 PM   #23
expeditionx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2004
Posts: 330
Glad I could clear that up for you. your welcome.
expeditionx is offline  
Old April 12, 2006, 09:01 PM   #24
HK_P7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2006
Posts: 113
I own a Benelli M3, and I have an extension to 7 rounds (if I remember correctly). The last I remember, I had to take my pistol-grip off in order to install the extenison and be legal. And if I wanted the pistol-grip on, I had to switch it back.

Since the Benelli is imported, this means I cannot use the extension anymore?
HK_P7 is offline  
Old April 12, 2006, 09:14 PM   #25
expeditionx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2004
Posts: 330
I had to take my pistol-grip off in order to install the extenison and be legal.

As far as I know, the ATF letter spells out not to use either a magazine extension or a collapsable stock.
If your shotgun came in pistol grip configuration, the stock part is settled, but adding a magazine extension according to the letter is a violation.


Anyway I have said enough on the issue. Anyone still interested in legal info write the ATF.

Bureau of ATF
Firearms Technology Branch
244 Needy Rd.
Martinsburg, WV
25401


Sterling Nixon ( he runs that department )
Firearms Technology Branch
(304)-260-1700

Sterling Nixon
expeditionx is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2020 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09441 seconds with 7 queries