The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 7, 2006, 06:01 PM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: September 20, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 340
up side down pump shotgun?

well I had an idea, why not put the magazine tube on top of the barrel? you could load through the top and eject through the bottom. This would lower the bore, and reduce muzzle climb. And with the shells ejecting out the bottom it would be ambidextrous. and the with the tube on the top you could make it double stack since you dont have a hand there.

Any thoughts?

one problem that I just though of would be heat, from the barrel near your hand.
From a Mod
"Seeing as how "butt Smurf" is not profanity in the usual sense and humorously creative, I'll leave this up for now"
Bender711 is offline  
Old April 7, 2006, 06:08 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: GA
Posts: 1,791
So what would you gain over a load from the bottom/eject from the bottom gun?
zoomie is offline  
Old April 7, 2006, 06:39 PM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,743
Did you even read what he said?

I know the Russians made some like this, but I don't know if any were imported. The RMB-93, if I remember right.

There is also the South African Neostead, which isn't quite double stack, but rather has two separate and distinct magazine tubes.
kozak6 is offline  
Old April 9, 2006, 12:35 AM   #4
psycho nut
Senior Member
Join Date: June 3, 2005
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 480
You just described the shotgun from Halo.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Haloshotgun.jpg (12.1 KB, 504 views)
I can't spel.
psycho nut is offline  
Old April 9, 2006, 12:50 AM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: GA
Posts: 1,791
Did you even read what he said?

It'd be ambidextrous - just like a bottom load/bottom eject
Reduce muzzle climb - maybe, or more likely it would just invert the force, especially with the extra weight of the shells creating a downward moment.
Double stack - I'll give you that one, but we already have 9 (or more?) shot guns. How many more are we talking here?
Heat in your hand - he debunked that one himself in his edit

So yeah, I read what he wrote and saw the only real advantage being more capacity. I hoped there was something profound I had missed. I suspect if it was that advantageous, we'd have them in production.
zoomie is offline  
Old April 9, 2006, 08:19 AM   #6
Join Date: February 13, 2005
Location: Valhalla
Posts: 79
Well, I suspect designers have looked at that idea and passed on it.

1. Top loading presents a large opening to weather/debris. You could possibly switch to a side loading gate like a lever action rifle.

2. Don't forget the action of ever present gravity...shells no longer just sit on the carrier, waiting to be lifted into position. Now they want to fall and so must be restrained...and yet be placed in the path of the moving bolt at the right time...this will require more complexity than standard designs. They would tend to fall out the bottom ejection port...more restraint required or better yet, switch to side ejection.

3. Certainly this is doable mechanically, but there's also the hidebound market to contend with....the only thing that will sway it from proven designs Pumps are very price sensitive so you'd have to make it substantially cheaper than existing designs to attract buyers. You'd have better luck in the semi-auto market.
mjolnir is offline  
Old April 9, 2006, 08:39 AM   #7
Senior Member
Join Date: July 23, 2005
Location: Castorland, NY
Posts: 545
Upside downside down guns

The Russians have had an upside down shotgun (RMB-93 ) for sometime now. Also the Neostead is currently in limited production in South Africa by Truvelo Armory.

There are several advantages to the design concept. I have been working some with Mr. Stead, one of the Neostead designers, to bring his gun to the states. There are a couple of military specific requirements that it would be ideal for. The trouble is my current contractor position is to closely related to requirements of the XM-26 for me to effectively work on the project without conflect of interest problems.

My contract position is over in August and I hope to return full time to the Neostead project then.

For that I will need a US production partner. The comments about pricing are right on, I doubt that you will ever see this has a commercial gun in the US.


Last edited by Desert01; April 9, 2006 at 09:33 AM.
Desert01 is offline  
Old April 9, 2006, 12:03 PM   #8
Senior Member
Join Date: December 26, 2005
Location: Byron Center, Michigan
Posts: 418
That thing's ugly. A function over form situation I geuss.
I have ADHD........Attention, Defficit, Hey there goes a squirrel!

Dont tread on me.
sparkysteve is offline  
Old April 9, 2006, 10:15 PM   #9
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2006
Location: West/Middle TN
Posts: 178
Why not just get a bps?
I've got a firm policy on gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be the one controlling it.

-Clint Eastwood
tBlake08 is offline  
Old April 10, 2006, 05:37 PM   #10
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2004
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,443
Well, I'd think that a toploader would be faster to load, and you could keep it on target while you load shells more easily. Other than that, I don't really know why it would be that great.

I say you should just take a mossberg 500 to the skeet range and shoot it upside down...........It's actually pretty fun.
"The SKS is a rifle, made the way they should be, out of a heavy block of crappy commie steel, set in an inletted semi-reshaped 2x4."

Not my quote but I agree completely.
rugerdude is offline  
Old April 11, 2006, 06:38 PM   #11
Senior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2006
Location: mid tennessee
Posts: 428
A strange concept indeed , but I think the comrades did it right with this one.

SpookBoy is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2016 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent:
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.05999 seconds with 8 queries