The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 8, 2005, 04:45 AM   #1
scoobydoo6906
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2005
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 306
.45 acp bullet weights

Which bullet weight would you go with for self defence, the 200 grain or the 230 grain bullets? Is the penatration better with the 230grain bullets? Any pros or cons to each?
__________________
Remington 700 BDL, Yugo M70B1 , Remington 870 wingmaster, Pre 64 Fn Mauser, WASR-10, Mossberg 500, S&W M&P-9, S&W M&P-9c, Mossberg 1500, AR-15 X2, Ruger 10/22, Kahr CW-9, Ruger P-89, Yugo SKS
scoobydoo6906 is offline  
Old September 8, 2005, 09:50 AM   #2
CarbineCaleb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2004
Posts: 2,745
I would go with the 230gr - yes, penetration is better.
__________________
“Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think.”
Niels Bohr
CarbineCaleb is offline  
Old September 8, 2005, 09:59 AM   #3
azspyder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 6, 2005
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 154
What is your barrel length? My experience has been that short barrels, say 3" respond better with light bullets while a 5" will do better with 230 gr. It's a matter of muzzle velocity...IMHO
azspyder is offline  
Old September 8, 2005, 10:05 AM   #4
mete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
Originally there were two bullets for the 45acp, 200 civilian and 230 military.If you are looking just for penetration the 230 would be better, in fact Winchester used to make a metal piercing load with the 230 at 100 fps faster. But if you are using JHPs most are designed to meet the FBI criteria for expansion and penetration so weight is not such a big consideration.If you want to penetrate cars then 230fmj ia the thing to use.
mete is offline  
Old September 8, 2005, 10:29 AM   #5
res1b3uq
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2005
Posts: 111
Bullet weight

I am still interested in accuracy. I have one .45 that is most accurate with 185 gr. bullets. That is what I buy. The other gun is for concealed carry, and it shoots the ammo well. I just cannot accept the fact that the small amount of weight we are talking about in a .45 is going to have that much more effect.
res1b3uq is offline  
Old September 8, 2005, 10:34 AM   #6
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2000
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,073
I use a short-barreled .45--a Taurus PT-145. When I chrono-ed the 230gr. loads, I was only getting 700-750fps. I thought that was a little low, so I dropped back to a 185gr. Gold Dot. I get about 900fps with that.
__________________
I am Pro-Rights (on gun issues).
Dave R is offline  
Old September 8, 2005, 11:28 AM   #7
CHM
Member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2005
Posts: 20
If you look at this from the terminal ballistics standpoint, the 185 gr bullet will deliver the most energy to the target. I would recommend something like the Hornady XTP 185 gr JHP. This would expand and not likely pass through the target. Thus all the energy is expended on the target.
CHM is offline  
Old September 8, 2005, 12:24 PM   #8
shield20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 13, 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 1,371
Depends on the weight and barrel - If carrying a heavier/fullsize piece I would go with 230 for the extra penetration. In my Colt ltwt. XSE I use Hornady 200gr TAPs. It offers a little more velocity, and a bit gentler shooting. very accurate and reliable.
shield20 is offline  
Old September 8, 2005, 04:39 PM   #9
cje1980
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,412
200gr. generally offers sufficient penetration in most HP designs. It actually is a pretty good load. It penetrates and expands well just like the 230gr. I would go with the 230gr, for the penetration and the fact that it is a common .45 weight. 200gr. can be harder to find at different stores.
cje1980 is offline  
Old September 8, 2005, 10:05 PM   #10
maximuss
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 246
I am a Ranger SXT 230gr guy however the store I normally get ran out of stock for forever.
So I got CorBon 165, 185, 230 they are all +P loads and I will go shooting tomorrow and tell you all about it when I get back on Sunday night or Monday.
maximuss is offline  
Old September 9, 2005, 02:05 AM   #11
RWK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 20, 1999
Location: Occupied Virginia
Posts: 2,777
IMHO, azspyder nailed the real issue. I own six .45 ACPs: three full size 1911A1 types, an H&K USP Tactical, a Sig P220, and a Glock 36. For the five full-size autoloaders, I use standard pressure 230 grain loads, but in the G36 -- with a shorter barrel and to retain velocity/expansion -- I use 200 grain +Ps.
__________________
__________________
Μολών λαβέ!
RWK is offline  
Old September 10, 2005, 10:31 AM   #12
Dre_sa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2005
Location: Left coast
Posts: 606
i have a reloading manual that says 185. gr can go up to 1171 fps safely .that gives 563 ft/lbs.
personally i wouldnt go beyond 1100 fps for 497 ft/lbs.
thats a lot of energy, and the lighter weight will mean reasonable penetration, dumping lots of it into the target, if it doenst exit.
that would be my carry load if i knew my 1911 could handle it properly, i dont know how far into +p territory thats is.
Dre_sa is offline  
Old September 10, 2005, 12:15 PM   #13
Webleymkv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,201
I'd take the 230grn loads: big, heavy, slow, and stable. If I want light, fast bullets I'll get a .40 or a 9mm.
Webleymkv is offline  
Old September 10, 2005, 12:34 PM   #14
Seraph
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2004
Posts: 372
Double Tap 230gr, with FMJ's or Gold Dots, moves out at 1010fps, for 521ft/lbs.
This cartridge is rated as just shy of +P territory.
Seraph is offline  
Old September 10, 2005, 12:41 PM   #15
CobrayCommando
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 21, 2004
Posts: 1,631
Are those ok to use in aluminium framed handguns like SIGs?
CobrayCommando is offline  
Old September 10, 2005, 12:50 PM   #16
Seraph
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2004
Posts: 372
Yes, I imagine even the frail Sig frames could handle this non- +P cartridge.
Seraph is offline  
Old September 10, 2005, 01:04 PM   #17
michael t
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2004
Location: Out back Ky
Posts: 4,044
In a short barrel 45 you need a lighter bullet. I have posted about shooting some barn wood with my 3" and 230 ball.Bullets were sticking out of wood. I pull them out with my fingers. Out of 5" right on thru. I have switched to the new CorBon 160 gr DPX non +P for compacts. Depenable and in jell has 12" and .75" expansion. It also blows thru my barn wood like a 5". I know it not a proper test but at least I have a way to compair the 2 rounds in same material. Also in compact almost no recoil compaired to 230.
__________________
Certified Armed Infidel Colt Defender ,Colt Mustang ,Dan Wesson CBOB, PPK/S, American Classic 1911,Bersa Thunder 380
http://bersachat.comHome of Bersa
http://www.metroarms1911forum.com
michael t is offline  
Old September 11, 2005, 10:39 PM   #18
maximuss
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 246
I have shot CorBon +P loads; 165gr, 185gr, and 230gr.
The recoil differs barely (at least to me).
I felt abit stronger snap (like the tip of the gun raise) toward heavier bullets but that is about it. For the difference, my choice is 230gr.
maximuss is offline  
Old September 12, 2005, 01:19 AM   #19
tinkanting
Member
 
Join Date: April 17, 2005
Location: peoples republik of kalifornication
Posts: 84
230 grain, penetration is always better
tinkanting is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07664 seconds with 7 queries