The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 6, 2017, 08:12 PM   #26
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,153
Unintentional Double Taps

I've got nothing against DA/SA and it sounds like it might be a good option for you. You could even look at a Walther P99 if you like striker pistols but want DA/SA.

To me striker fired pistols are not comparable to a 1911 cocked and unlocked. The trigger travel is generally more (pretty significantly so IMO), the trigger pull weight is generally higher (though some are pretty close to a stock 1911 to be fair), and you may blow off drop safety but that is a factor when it comes to firearms. Between the blade safety on the trigger and the striker block they're far more drop safe than a cocked and unlocked 1911, that's just a fact (I might even argue they're more drop safe than a 1911 with the safety on but no firing pin block, as the original design entailed).

I've carried literally every system mentioned in this thread from DA/SA with safety, to DA/SA with no safety, to cocked and locked, to striker fired pistols with no safeties. I do not feel now nor have I felt that carrying a striker fired pistol requires any more "perfect execution" to be safe than any other system. As someone that has had a negligent discharge himself (and learned the hard way) and read a number of accounts of others, the great majority of NDs seem to happen when people press triggers on pistols they think are unloaded but aren't. In that case once you've made the decision to press that trigger whether it's a heavy pull or a safety you need to swipe off then you go through that process and it happens regardless.

But if you feel differently then you should go with what works for you. If I've learned anything these past years it's that what works for one doesn't always work for another. Firearm choices, even down to trigger mechanisms, can become almost a religion that people get very particular in defending.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Last edited by TunnelRat; April 6, 2017 at 08:22 PM.
TunnelRat is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 08:14 PM   #27
random guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
Quote:
Are you talking about a series 80?
Yes, and I assume that most modern renditions use the same safety improvements. I know Colt makes some Series 70 guns still but they are special cases.

I am no 1911 guru, nor do I aspire to be. I am open to being corrected.

Last edited by random guy; April 6, 2017 at 08:24 PM.
random guy is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 08:21 PM   #28
random guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
Quote:
To me striker fired pistols are not comparable to a 1911 cocked and unlocked. The trigger travel is generally more (pretty significantly so IMO), the trigger pull weight is generally higher (though some are pretty close to a stock 1911 to be fair), and you may blow off drop safety but that is a factor when it comes to firearms. Between the blade safety on the trigger and the striker block they're far more drop safe than a cocked and unlocked 1911, that's just a fact.
The thing is, "striker fired" has virtually nothing to do with trigger pull. A striker gun can be true DA, 60% pre-cocked, or fully SA. I think there is a lot of confusion about that.

Not blowing off drop safety at all. It just should not be the entire safety package in a single action pistol. Triggers do get pulled particularly while re-holstering. It's not always a finger that does the pulling. Better than a thumb safety to make me feel better while re-holstering would be a hammer to keep my thumb behind.
random guy is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 08:28 PM   #29
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,153
Unintentional Double Taps

Yea I know that striker pistols can function in different ways (even DA/SA and true DAO). I've owned most of them. For my purposes the level of precook for the striker really isn't a concern of mine.

While triggers do get pressed accidentally, that's still the user. People shouldn't be in such a rush to reholster. If you're reholstering it's because you've determined that the threat has abated. Slow down a second. Part of holstering is making sure the holster is clear of obstructions and that your cover garment isn't in the holster. A lot of times when it comes to discharges while holstering it's because people are using cheap holsters that fold in on themselves and end up getting into the trigger guard. To me a holster with a rigid opening that keeps itself open is paramount. If you're really concerned of your holster pulling the trigger of your pistol I'd suggest getting a different holster.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Last edited by TunnelRat; April 6, 2017 at 08:37 PM.
TunnelRat is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 08:33 PM   #30
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,153
Quote:
Originally Posted by James K View Post
"The other alternative is a mechanical failing in the pistol itself."



Why is that seemingly impossible, especially is someone has tried to "tune" the trigger pull. It is not uncommon for a sear engagement to fail as the gun wears, due to several factors, including improper attempts at "gunsmithing".



A pull weight of over 5 pounds and a trigger movement of .1 inch does not seem unsafe, but if the trigger pull has significantly changed over a short period, it might be a good idea to have the pull checked by a gunsmith or the factory. Things are often relative; a 5 pound pull might be unsafe if the norm for a gun is 10 pounds and that is what a shooter is expecting.



Jim


I never said it was seemingly impossible. I think the user is more likely the issue but if I didn't think mechanical failure was possible I wouldn't have mentioned it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TunnelRat is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 08:36 PM   #31
random guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
Quote:
For my purposes the level of precook for the striker really isn't a concern of mine.
As long as we realize that the level of pre-cock will greatly affect the trigger pull. Glock versus either of these strikers are worlds apart.

Quote:
To me a holster with a rigid opening that keeps itself open is paramount.
Agreed. Good sturdy Kydex is a wonderful thing. I cringe every time a see a guy running drills and virtually slamming his pistol back in the holster in between. What's the rush?

Apologies to the OP for dragging this off course.
random guy is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 08:49 PM   #32
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,153
Unintentional Double Taps

True it will affect the trigger pull, but to me the weight of that pull is more the driving factor, both in terms of my performance and my impression of safety in terms of negligent discharges. I've had stock M&Ps with 6.5 lb. triggers and Glocks with 5.5 lb. triggers despite the M&P being much closer to SA than a Glock (and with APEX parts basically SA). So the amount of striker cocking isn't always a perfect predictor of the resulting pull (though the crispness of the break will be different and the more SA like pistols have a more sudden release of the striker that IMO seems crisper).

I know there are those that argue the Glock is safer because they claim that until the striker is cocked fully there is not enough energy to actually detonate a primer were the striker to release from a mechanical failure. I've seen people claim that's true and others claim it's false. To me whether true or false the vast majority of striker pistols people buy still have a striker block. That has to fail regardless of the amount of precock. I don't have documented probabilities in terms of the chances of that happening, but from searching it seems extremely rare unless someone decided they knew better and messed with the striker block. So to me the degree of precock isn't likely to affect the overall safety when you consider the chances of the striker block failing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TunnelRat is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 09:04 PM   #33
random guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
Yeah, Glock triggers can be pretty light (or not) but with a long cocking action. I really don't know which is safer. Plenty of ADs with Glocks too.

Thinking through the many details of carrying (like holster design and trigger discipline) is the ultimate safety. We make a lot of decisions along the way. And for me, right now, I've decided that an empty chamber is less risky to me than a loaded one. As you say, this doesn't necessarily apply to others.
random guy is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 09:05 PM   #34
sixgunnin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 24, 2017
Location: Montana
Posts: 182
I was once shooting at a coyote with a cheap AR 15 and had it accidently bump fire about 8 rounds Since then I have got good at bump firing, and have learned why it did this, it was on a bipod and I didn't have it tight against my shoulder.
sixgunnin is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 09:10 PM   #35
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,153
Oh I would completely agree that in terms of an AD/ND an empty chamber is definitely safer. But for me carrying a pistol is done in the unfortunate chance I might have to use that pistol, not just to avoid AD/ND. Given that I can't guarantee I'll have the time or access to both hands to be able to chamber a round, I go with a chambered round. And again I'm not telling you what to do but if the weight of the trigger or the degree of precock is your concern, there are other options out there you might want to explore. The great part of the gun world today is that there is an option for just about every preference.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon
Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges
Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture
Maintain situational awareness
TunnelRat is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 09:11 PM   #36
random guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
I had a Gold Cup do this a few times(double, not eight rounds). It was a worn out sear.
random guy is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 09:18 PM   #37
random guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
Quote:
Given that I can't guarantee I'll have the time or access to both hands to be able to chamber a round, I go with a chambered round.
Yep, it's a trade off for me. Given two hands, loading the chamber should be quick but if I am already grappling or hurt it could bite my butt. I'm going to take that risk for the moment. Or carry my "very safe from AD" Keltec.
random guy is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 09:48 PM   #38
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,453
Quote:
Yes, and I assume that most modern renditions use the same safety improvements. I know Colt makes some Series 70 guns still but they are special cases.

I am no 1911 guru, nor do I aspire to be. I am open to being corrected.
Correction: Most Colt, Kimber, some S&W, Para, Auto Ord, some Sig, maybe a few other 1911 mutants have mechanical firing pin obstructions.
Some others consider a titanium firing pin to be adequate drop protection.
In general, the higher priced the gun, the closer to standard lockwork.


I have handled but not shot the S&W Plastic M&P 2.0. If the trigger is significantly better than the original, I am not sensitive enough to tell it.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 09:50 PM   #39
straightshooterjake
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2016
Posts: 122
I am surprised by the viewpoint in this thread that poor grip or user error is a very likely cause for a semi-auto to double. User error is certainly a possible cause, but I have seen more guns double due to mechanical problems than user error. I would say that most, but not all, of the mechanical issues were due to poor gunsmithing.

Regardless of the cause, I consider unintended doubles to be a serious safety issue. There is no particular reason to think the second shot will hit the backstop, it could happen at a point of the recoil where the gun is pointed much too high.

Also, if a gun doubles due to a mechanical issue, there may be a possibility that it will go full auto. And if that happens, there is no knowing where the shots will go.

If a gun is doubling, it needs to be examined until a cause is determined. If the cause is a training issue, then it needs to be addressed promptly. In some ways, the trigger is the primary safety mechanism in a firearm, and if it is not working properly, then it needs to be addressed.
__________________
My blog: http://straightshooterjake.blogspot.com/
straightshooterjake is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 09:57 PM   #40
random guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
Quote:
In general, the higher priced the gun, the closer to standard lockwork.
Standard meaning Series 80 (or similar) or the original Browning lockwork?
random guy is offline  
Old April 6, 2017, 10:16 PM   #41
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,453
Original Browning/Colt design. You will not find a "series 80" or "II" etc Wilson, Baer, Brown, NH, GI, or full custom. Some do use titanium firing pins.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old April 7, 2017, 05:27 AM   #42
random guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
Thank you sir.

I suppose between the grip safety and a Ti firing pin, those guns should be largely drop safe.
random guy is offline  
Old April 7, 2017, 09:11 AM   #43
micromontenegro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2010
Posts: 645
Somebody must say it:

That ain't a double tap. That is called doubling.
micromontenegro is offline  
Old April 7, 2017, 09:52 AM   #44
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,453
Depends on how you get there.
"Doubling" is a gun fault, a full auto burst.
The "unintentional double tap" is poor trigger control. An ND if you want to be critical about it.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old April 7, 2017, 04:33 PM   #45
Cheapshooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
My only unintended double tap has been with a PA 64. The S/A trigger is crazy light. Funny thing, and if you own one you know what I mean, the D/A takes a Go-rilla to pull.
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING!

Last edited by Cheapshooter; April 7, 2017 at 08:44 PM.
Cheapshooter is offline  
Old April 7, 2017, 05:58 PM   #46
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,617
Quote:
if a gun doubles due to a mechanical issue, there may be a possibility that it will go full auto.
Pardon me for pointing out that a gun that doubles (fires more than one shot with one pull of the trigger) is ALREADY a full auto, under the law.

A gun that doubles because the shooter actually pulled the trigger twice (without realizing they did pull the trigger a second time) is a different matter.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old April 7, 2017, 06:34 PM   #47
walks with gun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 20, 2014
Location: northern Mn.
Posts: 271
I really don't like the PPQ series, an accident waiting to happen, like carrying a single action revolver with the hammer cocked.
walks with gun is offline  
Old April 7, 2017, 08:35 PM   #48
rodfac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 22, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,618
Quote:
I purchased a Walther PPQ 45 a few months ago and fell in love. The trigger is "great". However, now that I've put close to 500 rounds through it, the trigger is so light that I've been getting unintentional double taps at the range. Meaning, I try to pull the trigger once and the gun is going off twice.
This is not a pistol to carry for defensive purposes nor is it suitable for range practice, until you get the doubling problem solved...I suspect it's the gun but training for your trigger manipulation, professionally administered, is also a good idea. You may be "milking" the trigger...ie. attempting to find a 'reset' point instead of following through on the shot. Not good...get help for the gun and some training for yourself. No offense intended..Rod
__________________
Cherish our flag, honor it, defend it in word and deed, or get the hell out. Our Bill of Rights has been paid for by heros in uniform and shall not be diluted by misguided governmental social experiments. We owe this to our children, anything less is cowardice. USAF FAC, 5th Spl Forces, Vietnam Vet '69-'73.
rodfac is offline  
Old April 8, 2017, 03:44 AM   #49
random guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2017
Posts: 272
Quote:
I really don't like the PPQ series, an accident waiting to happen, like carrying a single action revolver with the hammer cocked.
True to a degree, although it would be a moderate pull weight for a revolver and there is a light take up stage before the trigger pull proper commences.

After the first time a user pulls the trigger, subsequent repetitions should not come as a surprise. It is what it is, time after time. How the owner uses said pistol is up to him.

The overwhelming trend seems to be toward triggers which are easier to shoot well on the range. Single action, lighter weight "safe action", it's a predictable trend. Everyone wants to be Deadeye Dick including me. And to be fair, accuracy is a major safety factor in itself. The rub is that these pistols are no longer the "17 shot double action revolvers" that changed the landscape a few decades ago.

This is all due to consumer pressure. Don't buy a gun that you don't feel is safe for your uses.

The OP's particular situation may involve more than the design of the gun though. Either worn parts or his trigger manipulation may be the issue.
random guy is offline  
Old April 8, 2017, 10:08 AM   #50
sigarms228
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 29, 2011
Posts: 1,763
Quote:
I really don't like the PPQ series, an accident waiting to happen, like carrying a single action revolver with the hammer cocked.
Not even close.

The PPQ trigger has significant tactile take up rather than a hair like trigger on SA pistol.

The PPQ has a trigger blade safety like a Glock.

The PPQ has a firing pin safety block like a Glock.

I have no reservations CCW my PPQ in a quality all kydex holster. To me it would be inanity to carry a single action revolver with the hammer cocked.
__________________
“When the people find that they can vote themselves money that will herald the end of the republic.”
― Benjamin Franklin
sigarms228 is offline  
Reply

Tags
double tap , ppq , striker , trigger , walther

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09930 seconds with 8 queries