July 10, 2012, 04:08 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 30, 2005
Posts: 122
|
.22 Magnum vs. 9mm
Well I had ran out of new .22WMR to test, so I decided to fire a round from my carry pistol, a Glock 19 9mm loaded with Speer 124 grain +P ammunition (this runs about 1220 FPS). This was in comparison to Speers new .22WMR load, a 40 grain Gold Dot JHP SB. Although this round was designed for short barrels, I fired it into the gel at close range from a rifle to find out what its maximum possible performance is.
Again, this block was not calibrated. However, based on the 9mms penetration (12 inches), this block should be perfect, considering this load penetrated anywhere from 11-13 inches in an ideal block of gel. The rifle used was a Marlin 25MN at a distance of 5 feet. Weather was 75 degrees (rain), and the block was shot within 5 minutes of being pulled from the fridge. Here is a close up of the .22WMR Gold Dot. Here is a picture of the entire block. The .22WMR was from the right, the 9mm was from the left. And here is a picture of the .22WMR recovered bullet and fragments, next to the recovered 9mm bullet covering a dime. I was really suprised at the results of the .22WMR GD. Gold Dots have been known for weight retention and deep penetration, and although I figured the extra velocity from a rifle barrel would cuase some fragmentation, I didnt think it would be to this extent. Of all the loads I have tested so far, this load was one of the most impressive. The initial temporary cavity was 3 inches in diameter, and fragmentation was extensive, and it penetrated to 7 inches. It also had the largest permanant cavity of any load I have tested so far. I am very curious what kind of velocities this load is pushing with a rifle, and IMO, if it turns out to be accurate enough, this would be a great varmint load, and at extended ranges would be great for coyotes. I hope to find someone in my area with a NAA or 2 inch barrel revolver becuase I am interested to see how this and the Critical Defense load compare from a short barrel. Anyway, I hope everyone enjoyed! Last edited by Glock19Fan; July 10, 2012 at 05:16 PM. |
July 10, 2012, 04:09 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 30, 2005
Posts: 122
|
By the way, I am in no way suggesting the .22WMR is an adequate self defense load. But as far as I know this is one of the first gelatin tests with the new round, and I just wanted to give everyone an idea on how it compares to a standard handgun caliber loading.
|
July 10, 2012, 05:00 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 24, 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 1,552
|
Those fragments would be a bia bia to get out of someone's flesh and would likely be primo infection sites.
|
July 10, 2012, 08:57 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 30, 2005
Posts: 122
|
After a couple of the .22WMR COM I highly doubt an infection would be possible.
|
July 10, 2012, 10:45 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2007
Location: Lago Vista TX
Posts: 2,425
|
Love the round ... very accurate at SD distances with my NAA Pug ... I mostly carry it with Hornady's Critical Defense 45gr rounds ... sposed to do around 1000fps from that barrel
__________________
"The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." Albert Camus |
July 10, 2012, 11:31 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2010
Location: Hill Valley
Posts: 265
|
From what I have observed, 22 mag is a formidable round in terms of power and speed.
Most gun enthusiasts dont give the round credit for self defense purposes because it is not readily available for a semiauto compact pocket-sized firearm. I respectfully disagree with those folk. As a proud owner of several NAA mini 22 magnum "mouse guns", I have come to the conusion that this round, coupled with the consealability of its housing, "rocks"!
__________________
- BIFF TANNEN - The great-grandson of Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen. |
July 11, 2012, 03:09 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
How much velocity drop does one get with .22WMR in an NAA mouse gun, though, as opposed to a rifle?
|
July 11, 2012, 05:27 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 2009
Location: Mid Western Michigan
Posts: 1,187
|
I'm no expert but I bet at handgun velocities the 22 Mag Gold Dot would have hung together better and maybe penitrated further. It is after all designed for handgun velocities. It would be an interesting to compare the round in different barrel lengths against each other in geltan. Thanks for posting.
|
July 13, 2012, 07:50 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
I'm amazed at the amount of fragmentation of the Gold Dot. That would be nasty wound with lots of blood.
Nice post Glock Fan.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson |
July 13, 2012, 08:21 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2005
Location: Northeast TX
Posts: 1,197
|
I can't reload 22 Mag, so it's not an option for me.
|
July 13, 2012, 11:01 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2004
Posts: 2,745
|
Quote:
The 9mm certainly did well!
__________________
“Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think.” Niels Bohr |
|
July 14, 2012, 04:26 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 9, 2011
Posts: 177
|
A 22 magnum is a lethal lethal backup ankle holster type gun I won't go without.
|
July 14, 2012, 12:17 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 514
|
I've seen what they do on small game from a handgun and it is impressive. They have the same energy as a 38 special. My brother shot a jackrabbit up close with one and blew its whole chest cavity open. It also leave big holes in armadillo even at fair ranges.
For a backup, if rimfire rounds were more reliable, I'd rather have a 22mag than a 32acp. Also, lookup the Strassburg Goat tests where large goats were shot with different rounds. They stopped testing the 22lr quickly as it wasn't always lethal but the testers noted that the 22mag was surprisingly effective and lethal. |
July 15, 2012, 03:00 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
Impressive....wonder what it does from a 4-6" bbl. pistol like a Taurus 941 or Ruger Single-Six....
__________________
Proud member of Gun Culture 2.0...... |
July 16, 2012, 12:07 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Lake Conroe, Texas
Posts: 1,059
|
Works for me! In Pocket Pistols, I have a PM9, an LCP and a S&W 442. This gets more carry time than all, with the LCP being second. It's almost flat in your pocket and weighs 8.6 oz.
I load with the short barrel Gold Dot 22 mag.
__________________
What me worry |
July 16, 2012, 02:49 AM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2012
Location: NV
Posts: 743
|
Quote:
|
|
July 16, 2012, 08:14 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
2cooltoolz: interesting grips. Where did you get those?
__________________
Proud member of Gun Culture 2.0...... |
July 16, 2012, 03:33 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Lake Conroe, Texas
Posts: 1,059
|
Chong Vang Grips. I don't think he has a site. I found him through this forum:
Chong Grips Chong Vang Grips Chong New Materials
__________________
What me worry |
July 17, 2012, 12:11 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,676
|
You're really comparing apples to oranges both in platform and caliber/cartridge. No offence intended but the combined results mean nothing.
As for the .22M, it sucks in handguns and isn't a coyote round at pretty much anything but point blank range from a rifle. Go .22lr or go centerfire. The .22M is a niche round that fills a very small niche. |
July 19, 2012, 04:47 PM | #20 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 28, 2012
Posts: 150
|
I have access to special .22 LR rounds that can basically be used in strong-enough rimfire guns. They have twice the power of the average .22. They are more powerful from a 6" revolver than standard .22's out of any rifle. Out of a rifle they have the same power at the muzzle as a .44 Special and at 100 yards these special jacketed bullets have the same velocity as a regular .22 LR at the muzzle! I am happy to pay a little more for 'em.
They are called .22 Magnums. "Niche" my arse. |
July 19, 2012, 05:29 PM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: June 18, 2012
Posts: 55
|
Lol, the 22m will drop a yote in his tracks at 100 yards.
|
July 20, 2012, 10:58 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,787
|
.22 mag obviously has quite a few fans, and I wouldn't try to talk anyone out of using a gun and/or a round that they really like, but . . .
Using the Genitron.com site, I find 34 handguns when searching .22 WMR, of which just 2 were pistols, a half-dozen derringers, and the rest revolvers. Searching 9 mm caliber gives 538 choices, including a handful of derringers and revolvers (all Taurus), the rest pistols. Does that make .22 mag a "niche" round? I suppose it depends on your definition, and perhaps whether you are considering pistol or revolver. |
July 20, 2012, 11:22 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 30, 2005
Posts: 122
|
I understand the differences here. I was just doing a test for a rimfire forum i frequent and figured you guys would be interested.
|
May 29, 2019, 10:08 AM | #24 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2019
Posts: 1
|
22mag for Defense
I just keep a Kel-Tec PMR 30 on hand with two mags full of Hornady Critical Duty rounds. Heck, if nothing else, sheer numbers will overwhelm the assailant!
|
May 29, 2019, 10:33 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
I'll search for the article, it may even be in the archives here if someone wants to search. It was stated in an article the 22 mag is a wicked round because of velocity and tendencies to bounce around once inside the body.
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
|
|