|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 9, 2017, 12:56 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 959
|
Problems with +P ammo in the 9mm Shield?
So I have owned a 9mm Shield pistol since they came out and have many hundreds of standard and +pressure ammo through mine.
I was over on the Starline Brass website and under their listing for 9mm brass they state that they don't recommend it in the 9mm Shield for full pressure or plus pressure due to lack of case head support. This is the first I have heard of that, have I been in the dark these last few years or?????? |
August 9, 2017, 12:58 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,181
|
What does the manual say?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
August 9, 2017, 01:16 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 959
|
Quote:
|
|
August 9, 2017, 01:43 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,161
|
The long and short is that + p is only known to be safe in pistols marked or factory designated as +p. Its probably safe in most modern ones, but they are not tested with it. You roll the dice.
|
August 9, 2017, 01:54 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,551
|
The warning is for Starline 9mm brass. It might not be as strong in the unsupported region as other brands of brass.
Whether it applies to all brands of brass is less certain. |
August 9, 2017, 01:56 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 959
|
Right, I am more interested in any perceived issue with the Shield pistol as I have never heard this before and Starline isn't just some random BLOG IMO. Here is what they say:
Quote:
|
|
August 9, 2017, 02:03 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,551
|
|
August 9, 2017, 02:43 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 959
|
Interesting... Thanks for posting those links. It's funny I have never heard of this and I must be one of the lucky ones with an in-spec chamber.
I think I'll drag my Shield out to the range tonight and check it out anyways... |
August 9, 2017, 02:46 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,551
|
Not all brands of brass are created equal. Some are very strong in the unsupported region, some are not.
As noted in those posts, some brands demonstrate excessive case bulge in the unsupported region while others don't. |
August 9, 2017, 02:55 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
"...applies to all brands of brass..." +P brass is the same as non +P brass. It's the firearm that matters.
No mention of +P and the Shield on Smith's site. A lack of case head support would apply to any load too.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
August 9, 2017, 03:05 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,551
|
Quote:
|
|
August 9, 2017, 09:34 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 959
|
So I went to the range, and shot 100 rounds of handloaded 124 and 147 grain ammo through my shield: no problems encountered. The 147 is loaded to about 1000 fps and the 124 to 1200 but at standard pressure. No problems with either load.
No bulges whatsoever. |
August 9, 2017, 10:31 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Posts: 1,551
|
Quote:
Awesome. What brand(s) of brass were you using? |
|
August 10, 2017, 09:26 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 959
|
Quote:
|
|
August 14, 2017, 10:20 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: August 1, 2017
Location: North Central Illinois
Posts: 52
|
+P ammo is the same standard ammo that us old timers where shooting back in the days before SAAMI started screwing with the ammo pressure standards.
|
August 14, 2017, 11:16 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
|
I'm not sure about that as Browning High Power originally was not made for +P but when they changed things along with making a 40 S&W version they said it was OK for 9mm+P.
That was the case that the greater pounding from higher pressure would eventually damage the gun. Other guns have had similar problems. There definitely is a difference in hardness between different brands of cases. In fact cartridges made for full auto guns have harder and thicker cases .Gov't ammo of things like 223, 308 , 9mm have better cases. Early Glock pistols had less case head support ,but that was changed . With that was a change in the Federal cases - thicker and harder .
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver ! |
August 17, 2017, 09:38 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: May 26, 2005
Posts: 52
|
After getting a little curious I checked ammo recommendations for most of the plaskit guns, HK was the only one to say that their products would fire Nato ammo safely. I don't like HK so I'm still looking for an EDC.
|
August 17, 2017, 10:35 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 6, 2004
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 555
|
Think it might be because Starline specializes in selling brass to reloaders? In other words, it may never be a problem for those shooting factory ammo/brass one time. But if your gun is bulging cases, it may not be safe to load that brass a bunch of times. ??
|
August 18, 2017, 08:29 AM | #19 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
If you read the ammunition recommendations in many pistol owner's manuals, you'll often find a statement reading something like this. Quote:
Unless the manual specifically says NOT to use +P or NATO ammunition, or says that the pistol should be fired ONLY with SAAMI/CIP standard-pressure ammo, +P or NATO can generally be assumed to be within safe operating parameters. OTOH there is NOT an industry standard for +P+ ammo, so it should only be used if the manufacturer specifically says that it's safe, or if the shooter chooses to risk his own safety and his pistol's physical integrity. Also, understand that +P or NATO ammo is typically hotter than standard-pressure ammo by definition, and it will theoretically cause premature wear in ANY pistol. How soon that wear will cause significant problems is the question.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
||
August 18, 2017, 05:28 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
Well this is what it says in the link...
Quote:
Besides if your shooting a lot of +P or +P+ ammo in your guns your wasting a good deal of money. I doubt very much that anything will happen other than what you already know will happen...accelerated wear. tipoc |
|
August 18, 2017, 10:07 PM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: May 26, 2005
Posts: 52
|
I was surprised to see that firing a round that were +P Saami spec were not recommended and were said to accelerate wear and tear. Sounded to me that maybe the plaskit guns that many are swooning over were really light duty firearms. YMMV.
I have some Hirtenburger sub gun ammo I wanted to try in a plaskit gun I have. A Sig P- 226 handled it (although the sub gun ammo really slapped the Sig slide around though) ok. Oh well, just another fine idea laid to rest. |
August 18, 2017, 10:30 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,181
|
Quote:
__________________
Know the status of your weapon Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture Maintain situational awareness |
|
August 19, 2017, 01:57 AM | #23 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
Here's a link to the manual for the Shield. The bulk of the discussion on the ammo to be used is on page 9 and 10.
https://snwcdnprod.azureedge.net/sit...1310000_WC.pdf Quote:
Nowhere does it say not to use +P ammo. Basically it says that if the ammo is right for the gun and within SAMMI pressure specs then it's allright to use but that use also have to use your judgement on what is good for you and the gun. Quote:
On the other hand polymer framed firearms have well proven themselves in over 30 years of use. tipoc |
||
August 19, 2017, 09:07 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2,313
|
If the shield won't handle +P, it's trash.
I've never shot any commercial +P 9mm that gave any pressure indications at all. The only commercial 9mm I've shot that did was Federal +P+ TCFMJ 124gn, which exhibited catered primers. I shot Ranger +P+ 127gn in several 9mm's over the years...Glock 17 and 26, Beretta 92FS, Browning hipower, ...none showed any issues shooting that load.
__________________
The past is gone...the future may never happen. Be Here Now. |
August 19, 2017, 10:24 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
Why would you think it won't "handle" +P?
It's useful to read this thread... http://smith-wessonforum.com/smith-w...ing-cases.html The threads linked to above and the warning from Starline say that there doesn't seem to be as much case support for the 9mm ammo in the barrel of the Shield as there may be in some other guns. This means that the case bulges after being fired. So an improperly sized reload or some poorly made 9mm ammo cases may not properly fit. It also means that case life will be limited if you reload. The only one's to say it won't, far as I know, is Starline brass. That warning has more to do with Starline brass and the case support that the Shield provides, than it does with the Shield. Or at least it reads that way. I have not read of any "Ka-Booms" as a result of this. Glock had it's issues with the 40 S&W and lack of chamber support some years back. I have not heard of this with the Shield in 9mm. Might be useful to ask Starline about that. tipoc Last edited by tipoc; August 19, 2017 at 10:38 AM. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|