|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 24, 2005, 07:21 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 8, 2004
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
Posts: 2,457
|
Baby steps. First get the sporting clause of the GCA repealed, then the import ban, then 922(o). We have to show in increments that the Brady crowd is wrong. If we jump at 922(o) first, the first time something bad happens, we will not have another shot at the ones that make absolutely no sense (like the AWB) for decades.
__________________
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” - Samuel Adams |
June 24, 2005, 07:36 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2001
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 4,303
|
The "sporting" clause is the import ban. They just redefined "sporting" in 1989 to cover more guns.
__________________
NRA Certified Instructor: Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Home Safety, Personal Protection, Range Safety Officer NRA Life Member |
June 24, 2005, 08:14 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 8, 2004
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
Posts: 2,457
|
Check and roger.
__________________
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” - Samuel Adams |
June 24, 2005, 09:53 PM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: June 21, 2005
Posts: 42
|
hmmm, for some reason, with the current majority of the populace being very anti weapon....I don't see anything happening, guns only seem to make it to the nightly news with bad effect. If anything owning a gun will be harder and harder in the future
|
June 27, 2005, 08:39 AM | #30 |
Junior Member
Join Date: September 9, 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 13
|
Hate to say it, but I have encountered NFA dealers who talk long and hard about how the books should never be reopened. These are the same guys who list their MAC-11's for 9k and M-16's for 20k.
Heist makes a credible claim in that one of our largest obstacles may be overcoming the clout of the major dealers and collectors. When your multi-million dollar inventory might suddenly become worth only thousands, it does strange things to your perspective of right and wrong. What to do? Get them the major dealers to commit one way or the other by signing a petition to reopen the registry. In the long-term it's GOOD for business, but it will cause short-term pain to those already entrenched with millions invested. Some people will insist on maintaining the status quo, and usually those are the people with the most to lose and the most influence within the current system. |
July 25, 2005, 09:23 PM | #31 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 25, 2005
Location: staten island, new york
Posts: 4
|
Well i believe our best chance of of getting rid of 922(0) is through the courts. With that said we do have a chance of repealing the import ban and the others, however this would be diffucult. is going to take a while. But at the present time we have to wait for the to see the new make up of the supreme court. the best approach to repealing the machine gun freeze is to slowly chip away at the nfa law. i personally owned several illegal mgs before, although illegal i did use them, but thats a diffrent story. the best we could hope for right now is a ammnesty for illegall mgs. :barf:
I am a nra member,conservative, republican. Formerly none as wardog295 |
August 5, 2005, 06:10 AM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2002
Posts: 1,165
|
Quote:
__________________
NFAOA Repeal 922(o)! |
|
|
|