|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 11, 2011, 06:31 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2010
Location: Hill Valley
Posts: 265
|
2" vs 4" ballistics for 3" barrel?
I'm currently carrying a derringer with a 3" barrel, chambered in .38 / .357.
QUESTION- IF reliable ballistics for a certain ammunition are only available for either a 2" or 4" barrel, which should I go with for my 3" barrel? THANKS!
__________________
- BIFF TANNEN - The great-grandson of Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen. |
January 11, 2011, 06:52 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,424
|
http://www.ballisticsbytheinch.com/
The above website might have some info for you. Every barrel is unique. You can only generalize about external ballistics when thinking about barrel length. You posts begs the question of what is "reliable" information. Unless you actually chronograph your particular handgun with a particular load, you will never know. The various factors of a barrel other than length which may effect bullet velocity (that I can think of off the top of my head) are: bore smoothness, uniformity of diameter of the bore, depth of rifling, type of rifling, barrel to cylinder gap (if any), free bore (if any), and twist rate of rifling. In general I would consider the 2" barrel ballistics and be happy if you actually got any real increase. In a short barreled handgun a few % increase or decrease in velocity is not all that important.
__________________
NRA Life Member - Orange Gunsite Member - NRA Certified Pistol Instructor "When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society,
they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it." Frederic Bastiat |
January 11, 2011, 07:01 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2010
Location: Hill Valley
Posts: 265
|
Mello2u
Good advice... Sounds like what you are saying is, utilize any credible ballistics as a guideline, until I can test it out with my particular setup. Similar to a science experiment, where you have a control group and an experiment group, use the ballistics as the control group, and my gun as the experimental group. Also, I agree with the logic of your philosophy when you say "consider the 2" barrel ballistics and be happy if you actually got any real increase." Good thinking! THANKS! PS- Appreciate the link!
__________________
- BIFF TANNEN - The great-grandson of Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen. |
January 11, 2011, 07:17 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 1,840
|
The barrel length measurement for a revolver is made from the muzzle to where the barrel terminates at the cylinder gap. It does not extend to the breach face. For your derringer (and for semi autos) the barrel length measurement goes from the muzzle all the way to the breech face. In other words, for a revolver it covers the actual barrel, for other types it covers the barrel as well as the chamber.
__________________
"A Liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory". - Charles Krauthammer |
January 11, 2011, 08:01 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
Quote:
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson |
|
January 11, 2011, 08:18 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2010
Location: Hill Valley
Posts: 265
|
jhenry,
Okay... Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding... Are you saying that, when I'm looking at ballistics from a revolver and making comparisons to my derringer, a more accurate comparable measurement of the derringer barrel is the given factory "barrel length", MINUS the length of the round? Or am I missing the point completely? Thank you!
__________________
- BIFF TANNEN - The great-grandson of Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen. |
January 11, 2011, 09:22 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 1,840
|
You are correct. The revolver does however loose a tad bit of velocity due to cylinder gap, but not as much as many think. For the short barreled stuff I think the cylinder gap does not matter at all in practical terms.
__________________
"A Liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory". - Charles Krauthammer |
January 11, 2011, 10:07 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2010
Location: Hill Valley
Posts: 265
|
Jhenry:
Did you ever have a moment that you realized a fact that made so much sense you were ashamed you didn't understand it a moment prior?! THANK YOU... And so, the conclusion is, that with a 3" derringer barrel chambered for 38/357, the ballistics most relevent are that of a 38/357 revolver snubbie (unless, of course, the derringer ballistics are offered)! Case closed with Godspeed! (unless there are any last minute "dark horses" with additional gems of wisdom/insight/advice)... Thanks again, all!
__________________
- BIFF TANNEN - The great-grandson of Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen. Last edited by Biff Tannen; January 12, 2011 at 12:24 AM. |
January 12, 2011, 10:00 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 22, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,620
|
Biff...the pic below shows some testing I did last summer, shooting into a swimming pool. The tests were done with my wife's S&W 637-2 to test relative expansion of various .38 Special +P loads. All loads were chronographed and the velocities shown were the average of 5 shots at 12' screen distance. The revolver used has a 1-7/8" barrel (virtually the same as your derringer.)
Also, one bit of caution, factory velocity data is often optimistic to say the least and is affected by the length of the test barrel used. Individual guns vary as to velocity, of course, but the data I've included here was chrono'd by me in my guns, on a hot KY day. BTW, the Federal 129 gr JHP Hydra-Shok +P Tactical load chrono'd 840 fps from the 2" barrel. (Forgot to add it to the pic captions.) This same load chrono'd 951 fps from a 3" Chief's Special .38 Sp. The 3" barrel produced 921 fps with Remington's 125 gr .38 Spl +P JHP factory load. I don't have the velocity of the Winchester 125 gr Silver Tip JHP +P bullet. Before anyone get's their skivvies in an uproar, I'm well aware that the water expansion medium does not equate to human flesh and bone. I used the pool because it would allow me to have the same medium for all shots, and allow recovery of the spent bullets as well as offer a look at comparative expansion. I've posted this photo before...hope it helps...Rodfac
__________________
Cherish our flag, honor it, defend it in word and deed, or get the hell out. Our Bill of Rights has been paid for by heros in uniform and shall not be diluted by misguided governmental social experiments. We owe this to our children, anything less is cowardice. USAF FAC, 5th Spl Forces, Vietnam Vet '69-'73. |
January 12, 2011, 03:46 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2010
Location: Hill Valley
Posts: 265
|
Rodfac:
I find great value in water tests, in that they allow obgective and controlled comparisons of mushroom and expansion potential. Thanks much for sharing, and for your advice!
__________________
- BIFF TANNEN - The great-grandson of Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen. |
Tags |
ammo , ammunition , ballistics , barrel |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|