|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 12, 2011, 01:41 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11
|
WTK #6 shot for ruffled grouse?
I have always used target loads (#8) for shooting grouse. Is #6 overkill for ruffled grouse? I am looking at purchasing a shotgun that only takes 3" shells. Thanks.
|
March 12, 2011, 01:49 PM | #2 |
Member in memoriam
Join Date: April 9, 2009
Location: Blue River Wisconsin, in
Posts: 3,144
|
It only takes 3" shells? What kind of shotgun is that? Most will take the 2 3/4" as well as the 3" and you can continue to use the same shells as you always have. I have shotguns with 3 and 3 !/2" chambers and I shoot mostly 2 3/4" in all of them, both pump action and semi auto.
__________________
Good intentions will always be pleaded for any assumption of power. The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern will, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. --Daniel Webster-- |
March 12, 2011, 01:57 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
|
I have always preferred #6 for grouse. Better penetration thru leaves early in the season and 6s generally pass thru as opposed to 8s that stay in the body. Grouse are big enough that at most ranges #6s do not leave any holes in the pattern. I save the 7-1/2s and 8s for woodcock and doves.
|
March 12, 2011, 07:23 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 21, 2010
Location: az
Posts: 1,332
|
Quote:
I prefer #6 shot, better penetration. It seems like more birds hit the ground running with 7 1/2 and 8 shot.
__________________
"When there’s lead in the air, there’s hope in the heart”- Hunter’s Proverb "Feed me, or feed me to something. I just want to be part of the food chain." -Al Bundy |
|
March 13, 2011, 12:18 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 18, 2000
Posts: 708
|
I have been using sixes in my 20 gauge O/U for grouse for years.
Shot seven and a halfs for a while early on, but found sixes worked better.
__________________
"To disarm the people (is) the best & most effectual way to enslave them." George Mason. |
March 13, 2011, 02:31 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
I run what I've got on hand (12 ga) - be that 6s, 7.5s, 8s, or even 9s (if the shot size and weight are legal for that species).
What I've got on hand consists of whatever I find for less than $5/box during the year. Sometimes, only 6s are on sale; sometimes it's something else. (Win/Rem/Fed only, most of the time. I won't touch Estate or similar 'bulk' brands anymore. Had issues....). However, I generally only hunt Ruffed and Blue grouse. The smaller bodies don't tolerate meat damage very well. In the terrain I encounter them, a 5 yard shot is a long one. The average shot range is, literally, 5 feet! I generally just try to clip the spine, half way between the head and body. It makes for quick, flail-less kills, and easy identification by any wardens that want to inspect the carcass. (Blow up/off heads don't go over well...) At that range, with that type of shot; even the wad is lethal. Shot choice, so long as it's legal, doesn't matter much. ---I just wanted to add: The terrain I hunt in is extremely dense woodland with marshy areas. There are no chances for shots on the wing; so it's a matter of spotting them before they flush, and getting close enough to not have to shoot through 12 shrubs and a dead tree. This presents the spine/neck shot opportunities on stationary birds.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
March 13, 2011, 01:19 PM | #7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11
|
I should rephrase my question....... I am looking at the Browning Maxus semi auto shotgun. My friend has one and has told me it has issues cycling 2 3/4 light load shells like the 7 and 8 target loads.
It sounds like I should have been shooting 6 shot all of these years. I have always purchased the cheap target loads and never put any thought on it. I like the idea of better penetration through vegetation. If I am close I will just shoot for the head. Just want to add.....I also hunt in very dense areas in western oregon. Sometimes jungle like. Generally there is no opportunity to shoot on the fly. I am looking at a semi auto shotgun for a multi use purpose grouse and geese. Thanks for the help. |
March 14, 2011, 07:00 PM | #8 |
Member in memoriam
Join Date: April 9, 2009
Location: Blue River Wisconsin, in
Posts: 3,144
|
Your gun should handle the 2 3/4" shells just fine even the light target loads. My Mossberg M9200 will cycle anything I put in it from light loads of #9 to magnum loads of 00 but that is my gun. Your gun may or may not have the same issues as your friends gun. Your gun is advertised by Browning to be the most reliable of any and is supposed to handle the light loads as easily as the heavy loads. If it doesn't it's a factory problem or a dirty gun problem and I would suggest your friend have somebody take a look at his gun. Use what you got and enjoy.
__________________
Good intentions will always be pleaded for any assumption of power. The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern will, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. --Daniel Webster-- |
March 15, 2011, 07:53 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 11, 2010
Location: Rensselaer Co NY
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
|
|
March 15, 2011, 10:48 AM | #10 | ||
Member in memoriam
Join Date: April 9, 2009
Location: Blue River Wisconsin, in
Posts: 3,144
|
Quote:
Funny thing about the Remington 1100 was that they were designed for the 2 3/4" shell then came out with a 3" Magnum barrel for 3" only but some would shoot 2 3/4" if they were heavy loads and some wouldn't. That was only a partial answer for those who wanted to be able to shoot either so they came out with the 11-87.
__________________
Good intentions will always be pleaded for any assumption of power. The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern will, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. --Daniel Webster-- |
||
March 15, 2011, 11:37 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 8, 2011
Posts: 223
|
A lot of this depends on where you hunt. Birds in close that hold are often going to get shredded by 6's and 7 1/2's and 8's have denser patterns. I'd try and remember why birds downed vs birds shot at tend to average 30%-40%. In fall i shoot 7 1/2's later in the season if birds don't flush close I'd use 7 1/2's in the 1st bbl 6's in the 2'nd.
|
March 15, 2011, 12:49 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: February 24, 2009
Posts: 91
|
My brother has 2 Browning Maxus shotguns in 3 1/2 once broken in. He said they cycle all 2 3/4 1 oz and 1 1/8 loads for trap shooting. A high base #6 is a great grouse load and will cycle. The only gun I know of that says use 3 and 3 1/2 only shells is my Mossberg 935 it is designed for heavy goose and turkey loads.
Mwal |
March 15, 2011, 01:38 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,970
|
Quote:
Back on topic... As a rule, IMO, the more dense the brush, the heavier the shot. |
|
March 15, 2011, 03:33 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|