The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Gear and Accessories

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 5, 2014, 10:30 PM   #1
sbaker10
Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2013
Posts: 73
Army surplus vs "tactical clothing'

I live on a farm and have a range onsite about a half mile walk away. Sometimes I just want to strap on a gun or two and throw ammo in my pockets. Jeans a light belt dont cut it.

I want to get some clothing that will hold a pistol without sagging and has enough pockets to load with stripper clips, packets of 7.62x54r or boxes of .22.

Is my best bet checking out army surplus stores and maybe getting some bdus and a backpack or should I look at the new clothing?
sbaker10 is offline  
Old June 5, 2014, 10:45 PM   #2
jeager106
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 24, 2006
Location: N.E. Oh.
Posts: 527
Milsurp should serve you well.
jeager106 is offline  
Old June 5, 2014, 10:50 PM   #3
sbaker10
Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2013
Posts: 73
I''ll check out the surplus store nearby, never been before. I always thought range commandos were funny but shooting on my own property means dressing tacticool makes some sense
sbaker10 is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 05:44 AM   #4
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,808
You can buy new clothing and backpacks for less money than BDU's and real military surplus packs. A "real" 3 day assault pack will set you back $90-$100 for a used one in good shape. New are getting hard to find.

http://www.armysurplusworld.com/prod...roductID=48389

The cheap knockoff stuff isn't worth bringing home

BDU's are getting expensive too

http://www.armysurplusworld.com/prod...roductID=54078

Go to Home Depot or some other hardware store and buy a cloth tool bag or two. A lot cheaper than a range bag, and does the same job.

http://www.homedepot.com/p/Husky-18-...3N11/203224309

Jeans work fine, you just need a better belt.
jmr40 is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 08:20 AM   #5
g.willikers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
Unless you just like to buy neat stuff, what's wrong with a regular ole' inexpensive back pack to get all your equipment to the range?
Mine cost $10.
And, yeah, my range bag looks just like that tool bag, only larger.
Another ten bucks, brand new, at Goodwill.
I ain't cheap, would just rather spend the dough on something important, like reloading supplies.
Soft computer cases work good, too.
Nice and flat and easy to carry, with comfy shoulder straps.
Plenty of them around for only a few bucks.
Ok, ok, I'm cheap.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez:
“Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.”

Last edited by g.willikers; June 6, 2014 at 08:29 AM.
g.willikers is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 11:10 AM   #6
Kreyzhorse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
I'd go buy a backpack a steer clear of mil surplus. Not all of it is bad but there is some junk out there.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson
Kreyzhorse is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 11:53 AM   #7
psalm7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 7, 2014
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 543
I have lots of Mil surp from around the world . Thats what I use . Train like you Fight , Fight like you train . Of corse I realy get into it .
psalm7 is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 12:22 PM   #8
sbaker10
Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2013
Posts: 73
I've actually ripped cheap Wal-Mart special backpacks and a range bag would be ideal except for the gates and hills I have to deal with. Nevertheless spending 100$ on sturdier pants might not be the smartest thing to do.

It would probably make sense to buy an sturdier backpack Instead I suspose

Last edited by sbaker10; June 6, 2014 at 12:29 PM.
sbaker10 is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 12:30 PM   #9
loic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Posts: 162
I still use some issued tshirt from 1988/1990 when I was in the military. I buy mostly military surplus, it serve me well
loic is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 02:30 PM   #10
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,286
If I can find good gear in surplus,I have nothing against using it.

I have an older design Korean made knock off of a GI field jacket I like.

Some of it is good.Maybe its just me,but I have found the knockoff BDU's to be made of inferior cloth.If I get a little sag and kneel,the croth rips out every time.I quit buying them.

For what you describe ,have you considered a pair of Carhart bib overalls?

The pockets over the chest hold magazines or stripper clips just fine,but not a lot.No sagging,re-enforced knees that have a pocket to receive a pad,tough cloth...a bit crunchy when new,but once broke in,very comfortable.

Surplus Vietnam era web gear is cheap and available...web belt,suspenders,ammo pouches,canteens and assault pack.If you are on your own place,you don't need to worry about "opinions"and it was designed to do exactly what you are doing.

I have a knock off "courier" shoulder bag.It is compartmentalized.I can put brass in one section,it has a couple mag pouches,I can put binos in another section,pretty useful bag .I use it PD'ing
HiBC is offline  
Old June 6, 2014, 02:38 PM   #11
zincwarrior
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
Cheap hiking pants are good too. Very reinforced for lots of pockets. I'll send the "just get a bag" comment. Cheap = good. Alternatively I'd prefer genuine surplus over cheap import stuff.
zincwarrior is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07187 seconds with 10 queries