The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Tactics and Training

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 5, 2012, 01:10 AM   #1
wayneinFL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 18, 2004
Posts: 1,944
Resist the robbery or not?

Here's a situation in which a clerk is robbed, the clerk is compliant and the robber tries to shoot. Fortunately, the gun doesn't fire.

There is a prevailing school of thought that the victim should be compliant until he's pretty sure a robber will kill him, such as taking him into a back room or in a vehicle. In this case, I think the victim has ample reason to believe the robber means to kill him, without any of the normal indicators. At what point should he start to resist, if at all?

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/...,4447256.story
wayneinFL is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 01:25 AM   #2
Evil Monkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Posts: 812
There are no statistics showing fighting or complying is better than the other.

You do what you need to do.

I have seen instances where people complied and were not hurt.

I have seen instances where poeple complied and were killed.

I have seen instances where people fought back and won.

I have seen instances where people fought back and were killed.

there is no right way, only YOUR way.
__________________
BREAKING NEWS: Local man found in the street yelling "1911" and "45" while drooling, more at 11:00.
Evil Monkey is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 01:41 AM   #3
.40cal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 27, 2006
Location: Somewhere in SC
Posts: 216
Every situation is different. I do not believe that there is a "one size fits all" here. You just have to go with your gut feeling . . . and hope that you choose the right path.

Money is not worth a life, so I would try to give the robbers what they asked for with no resistance. However, if I thought there was a good chance I was not going to make it, then I would have to act accordingly ( even if that ment fleeing the situation and taking my chances getting gunned down from behind )

It's seems strange to me that someone would rob a store and shoot and kill the clerk, all for only a couple hundred dollars at most. What is this world coming to??

Thanks for the vid!
__________________
"The philosophy of gun control: Teenagers are roaring through town at 90MPH, where the speed limit is 25. Your solution is to lower the speed limit to 20.”
.40cal is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 01:52 AM   #4
TheNocturnus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,097
The 3 times I was held up at gunpoint, the robbers just wanted my stuff and wanted to leave quickly. 2 of the 3 times if I was armed, I could have ended their life. I am now always armed and hope the 4th robbery does not occur. If it does, someone is not making it home.
__________________
My EDC:
Gun
Wallet
Brain (Use this one the most)
TheNocturnus is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 03:10 AM   #5
BlackFeather
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2009
Location: West Coast
Posts: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by .40cal
It's seems strange to me that someone would rob a store and shoot and kill the clerk, all for only a couple hundred dollars at most. What is this world coming to??
People have killed for less through out the history of man. Nothing is really any different, just more ways to do it.

I would like to think I would comply, but sometimes I think about it and really it depends on the situation. Would I wrestle for a gun, attempting a disarm I have practiced? Maybe, but he could flinch and shoot me if the gun is on me. Would I do everything possible to live, including giving him everything? Maybe, but after that what really stops someone from killing me if there were no other witnesses?
__________________
"Today is victory over yourself of yesterday; tomorrow is your victory over lesser men." - Miyamoto Musashi

[Insert random irrelevant religious quote here]
BlackFeather is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 06:08 AM   #6
Nnobby45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
Quote:
There is a prevailing school of thought that the victim should be compliant until he's pretty sure a robber will kill him, such as taking him into a back room or in a vehicle. In this case, I think the victim has ample reason to believe the robber means to kill him, without any of the normal indicators. At what point should he start to resist, if at all?
I've seen too many videos where the victim DIDN'T HAVE TIME TO BE SURE OF A DANG THING.

He or she was just SHOT without any "ample reason", without any "indicators". In such cases, the victims' murders were probably determined in advance.

Starting the resistance when you have a gun to your head as you unlock your car or while in a 7 Eleven might be a bit late. It also might be your only chance, and no one on a gun forum can answer your question for you.

Just my opinion that may not be shared by all.
Nnobby45 is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 11:02 AM   #7
besafe2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 117
IMHO circumstance dictates.
__________________
"Blessed be the Lord my strength,which teacheth my hands to war and my fingers to fight".
Psalm 144:1 KJV Be safe: Paul
besafe2 is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 01:03 PM   #8
Pianoguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 235
It comes down to whether or not you could reasonably feel your life or limb was in serious danger and the person actaully was capable of hurting you. If the assailant does not obviously pose a threat to do you serious injury than using dealdly force may not be applicable and could get you into serious trouble. Then you do whatever you can to get out of the situation including complying. Your wallet is not worth the assailant's life no matter how mad you may be about it.

Unless the assailant had a knife or gun and indicated he/she may use it or I was out numbered and the assailants seemed intent on doing more than just robbing me, I would try some other means to get out of the mess. My wallet does not have any really important stuff in it so I would have no problem handing it over if that would make someone happy. I also have some pepper spray that I could use if the situation warranted it.

I asked the question of my CC trainers, if someone approached you in a parking lot to rob you could you just pull your gun and say no, get lost. Basically the answer is no if your life isn't at that point in danger. Threatening deadly force is illegal by itself unless it is done in a viable self-defense situation.

The problem is when you don't see trouble coming and you have to act very quickly. The safer bet may be to pull the weapon and take your chances. But it is why it is so important to stay alert to your surroundings. My worst scenario isn't losing my wallet but having someone get my gun, too. Then I'm not only scewed but probably someone else later on.
Pianoguy is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 01:15 PM   #9
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
The trouble is generally more that you are way, waaaay behind the reaction curve when someone is standing there with a gun pointed at you and yours is holstered somewhere.

I'm not so much an advocate of "compliance" as I am the realization that a guy who has to move one finger 3/4s of an inch has a distinct, almost insurmountable advantage over the guy whose gun is in a holster.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives...
...they just don't plan not to.
-Andy Stanley
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 02:04 PM   #10
Glenn E. Meyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
My standard answer to this - is that one should do a lot of FOF scenarios.

Sometimes you get shot, sometimes you don't, sometimes everyone gets shot. Sometimes you can just run out of the melee or hide.

There is no one answer but quality FOF gives you a handle on the alternatives.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens
Glenn E. Meyer is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 03:41 PM   #11
highvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2010
Location: Powhatan VA
Posts: 633
I do know one thing, if I told you what I would do, I'd be a liar!
__________________
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.--Mark Twain

"I have opinions of my own 'strong opinions' but I don't always agree with them."--George Bush
highvel is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 08:45 PM   #12
Polynikes
Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2010
Posts: 61
Evil Monkey-
Quote:
There are no statistics showing fighting or complying is better than the other.

You do what you need to do.

I have seen instances where people complied and were not hurt.

I have seen instances where poeple complied and were killed.

I have seen instances where people fought back and won.

I have seen instances where people fought back and were killed.

there is no right way, only YOUR way.
Actually, according to a study done by the British Home Office (not exactly a pro-gun institution) “you are far more likely to survive a violent assault if you defend yourself with a gun.”

In episodes where a robbery victim was injured, the injury/defense rates were:

Resisting with a gun 6%
Did nothing at all 25%
Resisted with a knife 40%
Non-violent resistance 45%


http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-fa...5-0-screen.pdf
Polynikes is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 08:56 PM   #13
trex1310
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 389
The two times I was in a robbery situation I resisted both times
and shot the assailants. The first time I was faster and the second
the culprit brought a pipe to a gunfight. I don't think there is a pat
answer. You do what you got to do to go home.
__________________
NRA Life Member
Certified in laziness
Certified in watching TV
Certified in BBQ on the Green Egg
trex1310 is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 09:37 PM   #14
Mr Dish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 25, 2009
Location: Shepherd, MI
Posts: 128
Interesting question.
I have no idea what I would do. That being said......
Some of you are telling us that you have been robbed several times and complied each time. Seems to me you have simply encouraged the BG to continue his chosen profession. So, if you do indeed fight back the next time, my questions is this.....WHAT TOOK YOU SO LONG? Your original thought process was that your money wasn't worth his life and now it has changed. I know I'm sounding like a hard case but my wife has the same mentality. You see, she is Japanese and against guns. When I began getting interested in and purchasing guns, she did voice her oppinion (as a wife will do). I asked her one evening what she would do if I was away and someone broke into the house and was intent on doing the worst. She actually said she would rather they did whatever they wanted, she would/could never shoot someone. When I asked her what if our daughter was home at the time, she said maybe I needed to teach her how to use the pistols. She doesn't think she could do it but wants our daughter to be able to protect herself.
I understand that her feelings are a result of her culture, but we Americans have a different history. Whenever you allow the BG to do what he wants, he WILL do it again and again and again. It drives me nuts when I hear that it is a common practice to simply "comply" and then get on with your business. That is what they are counting on. I think the armed home robberies are down because the BG is afraid of an armed homeowner. But the armed robberies are up for business because they know noone will fight back. I understand the old saying "money isn't worth someones life", but we spend our entire lives trying to earn it. Why should we simply let some stranger walk in and take it away?
__________________
Vote Libertarian or QUIT COMPLAINING!
Mr Dish is offline  
Old January 5, 2012, 10:00 PM   #15
wayneinFL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 18, 2004
Posts: 1,944
To me resisting during a robbery has nothing to do with money. I keep hearing that it's not worth getting shot over $x.xx dollars. When someone has a gun pointed at you, it's not about money anymore.

That said, I understand people wanting to play it safe. In this video, the best time to fight back, IMO, was as the crooks walked in with their guns. Seconds later, the guy was on the floor with 2 guns pointed at his head. If you go by the idea that you should comply with crooks with guns pointed at you until it's obvious or imminent that they will shoot, this is obviously the time to fight. But at that point, his chance of survival is pretty slim.
wayneinFL is offline  
Old January 6, 2012, 02:47 AM   #16
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,712
When do you resist? There are a lot of possible responses.
Ideally, you remain compliant so long as it is beneficial to do so. A lot of folks are of the impression that they must resist as soon as possible which may result in premature hostilities.

Resistence takes all forms, however, not all of which are direct. One of my favorite attempted robberies happened back around 2002. What was posted was a series of photographs from an ATM machine at night where a guy had walked up to get money. In the background you see two guys approaching and one apparently has a gun. A couple of frames later, they are about 10 feet behind the guy and have apparently said something because the intended victims facial expression has changed. Next frame, intended victim with the bad guys are close, maybe 5 feet behind the guy. Next frame...two bad guys both looking stage left. One has a gun drawn and the other has some sort of weapon, but isn't clear in the image as to what it was.

The intended victim simply bolted from the situation. The bad guys got the money that had been dispensed by the machine, but the guy apparently hit CANCEL before he bolted and they were unable to extract additional money despite having his card. They tried and because of the photographs were eventually caught. The victim's money was insured.

Quote:
Actually, according to a study done by the British Home Office (not exactly a pro-gun institution) “you are far more likely to survive a violent assault if you defend yourself with a gun.”
Really? Just exactly what study was this? Please provide a link or actual citation to these data.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old January 6, 2012, 08:33 AM   #17
9ballbilly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2008
Location: northeast Florida
Posts: 610
Speaking only for myself. The ideas that it's only money or that you're allowing a criminal to continue his career path are irrelevant when faced with deadly force.

I would not rely on the mercy of a criminal. I've made a conscious and considered decision that IF I was ever in such a situation I would resist to the best of my ability.

No, I don't think I'm wild Bill Hickok or Doc Holiday. I accept the very real possibility that I would be hurt or killed. Still I would choose not to be a victim and no matter how far behind I am on the reaction curve I would be looking for an opportunity every second.
9ballbilly is offline  
Old January 6, 2012, 09:45 AM   #18
jrothWA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 11, 2006
Posts: 2,519
Once the "valuables" ahve tranferred...

and the perpetrator hasn't departed.

My "this is not good" sense is between the "oo"'s, and any request to move is likely hostile.
jrothWA is offline  
Old January 6, 2012, 11:15 AM   #19
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,712
Quote:
Really? Just exactly what study was this? Please provide a link or actual citation to these data.
I am still looking through the BHO website. They have lots of crime data in many studies. None seem to provide the data reported in Gunfacts which doesn't cite the actual name of the report or when it was conducted. This is rather odd given that the BHO site has so many entitled and dated articles on crime. It is almost as if the information was made up by Gunfacts and then attributed vaguely to BHO in a way by which the information cannot be readily found. You would think if such supporting information did exist in a study by the BHO, then Gunfacts would be quick to provide a proper referenceable citation (title, year, author, etc.) as they do this for several of their other sources.

Every place I have found this information on the internet attributes the data to the BHO, but is in the same form as Gunfacts. In other words, nobody else has seen this supposed study and are just copy and pasting the information from Gunfacts.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old January 6, 2012, 02:49 PM   #20
highvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2010
Location: Powhatan VA
Posts: 633
Nonviolent Resistance?????

What is that, holding your breath?
__________________
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.--Mark Twain

"I have opinions of my own 'strong opinions' but I don't always agree with them."--George Bush
highvel is offline  
Old January 6, 2012, 03:09 PM   #21
federali
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 1, 2011
Location: Nassau County NY
Posts: 378
Political Climate

In areas like NYC with strict gun control, the official, municipal party line is to behave like lambs and offer no resistance. Too many people who offered no resistance were executed, apparently for fun, including the father of a girl I once dated, who was mugged and shot dead on the subway.

There have been many successful robberies of gun stores here in the north east. You could be surrounded by guns but if your mindset is that of a lamb, you will lose. Safety and security doesn't begin and end with a gun. Remember: mindset, judgment, tactics, marksmanship and firearm. These elements must all work for you as a team. You could have a killer mindset but zero judgment for taking on a four-man robbery team with a two-shot derringer. You lose.
Hits with a .380 are more effective than misses with +P+ .45 ACP.
__________________
Int'l Assoc. of Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors
federali is offline  
Old January 6, 2012, 03:27 PM   #22
markj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
I often wonder what the robber would do if he tried to rob me as i have no cash or any credit cards on me.

In any instance, having a gun pointed at you gives you very few options.
In the ring fighting in competition in a marshal art distraction is a key component but would it work in this situation? Would the guy be distracted enough if a person fumbles the wallet and drops it?

In the 80s Idid a body guard school, was shown and practised dis arming manuvers, the commando type person could do this 9 out of 10 times on any one of us in that class.

After I was shot, I decided that the next guy pulls a gun on me will have my 350 lb body flung at him, maybe it will distract him enough...
markj is offline  
Old January 7, 2012, 02:41 AM   #23
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,712
Quote:
Nonviolent Resistance?????

What is that, holding your breath?
Nonviolent resistence means not complying or fully complying to demands while not trying to physically harm your robber. Examples would be things like verbally resisting (telling the robber you won't deliver what he wants, arguing with the robber), running away, trying to physically retain an item the robber is trying to take from you, etc.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old January 7, 2012, 04:32 AM   #24
Ruark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 12, 2010
Posts: 227
Death row is full of people who shot convenience store clerks after robbing them.
Ruark is offline  
Old January 8, 2012, 10:41 PM   #25
Nnobby45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
Quote:
Death row is full of people who shot convenience store clerks after robbing them.
Amen. That's why I chuckle when a board commando, who's never been in that situation, suggests that YOU should wait "until you think" you're about to be harmed before offering resistance. And they they proceed to tell you that means when you have a gun pointed at you and are told to get in the back room, on the floor, and so forth.

Just my thoughts on the matter.
Nnobby45 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10202 seconds with 10 queries