|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 8, 2016, 07:54 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2015
Location: Issaquah WA. Its a dry rain.
Posts: 1,774
|
Stupid question time with Chainsaw.
Can I use my AAC pilot2 to suppress subsonic 223? Is it still to much gas and pressure for a 22lr can? A 223 can is on the list but I dont have the cash atm andoobviously theres the six month wait thing.
|
January 8, 2016, 08:31 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
That's actually a good question. From a pressure standpoint it might be fine, considering subsonic .223 isn't that much more powerful than a .22 LR. But the Pilot 2 has aluminum baffles and -- if I recall correctly -- isn't rated for anything more powerful than .22 LR, so it might be pushing it. I'd also be worried about bullet stability with the long, subsonic .223 ammo, but that's an issue no matter what kind of silencer you're using. Ask AAC, they can tell you if it's safe and -- more importantly -- if it's covered under warranty if you shoot subsonic. 223 through it and something goes wrong.
But I have to ask, "why"? It won't cycle the action on a semi-auto and it's barely more powerful than a .22 LR. Almost nobody uses subsonic .223; everyone I know who uses a silencer on a .223 rifle uses supersonic ammo, including myself. Just shoot .22; it will have pretty much the same ballistics, but it will actually cycle the action and will be a LOT cheaper. In over three years working at gun shops I've never had anyone ask for subsonic .223 ammo who was actually serious about it and knew its downsides.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
January 8, 2016, 08:38 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2013
Location: Western slope of Colorado
Posts: 3,679
|
Call AAC.
Ive called a few suppressor manufactures about whats ok to shoot thru my cans. Thst said im betting they will say No. Not because subs are a problem, but because of the potential of slipping a full house 223 into the mix. That would ruin the can and might ruin you |
January 9, 2016, 12:19 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2015
Location: Issaquah WA. Its a dry rain.
Posts: 1,774
|
Thanks for the response guys.
As to the why, one simple use. A coyote. Ive been after this sob for months, I need something quiet so as not to irritate the neighbors but was hoping to slinga heavier round than a 40 grain 22lr. I was thinking I vould load up a hand full of 69gn subsonics. Shark bite. I thought of that too but I wouldn't make a habit of this practice especially being a real 223 can is on the list, but it still bore the question. Twouldbe a quick way to ruin a suppressor. |
January 9, 2016, 05:25 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
|
January 9, 2016, 12:26 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2015
Location: Issaquah WA. Its a dry rain.
Posts: 1,774
|
You are not wrong for sure. But in my situations you pretty much get one shotvat this coyote before he bolts, and about a second before he is obscured. My thinking is one heavier shot to smack him good. This is pretty much scenario playing in my head obviously. If I had my 300bo build done and suppressed it'd be a not issue
|
January 9, 2016, 01:09 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Posts: 1,293
|
Aguila makes 60 grain subsonic .22LR ammo. I would try this over a subsonic .223. Also I own a Pilot II and was thinking of running it wet just to see if it makes any difference or not. Well after searching high and low on the internet I couldn't find anything so I called AAC and asked them. The answer was a profound NO. The reasoning is the Pilot II's body and baffles are aluminum other than the first baffle. Adding water would lower the volume of air in the can and could increase the pressure enough to swell the tube. Needless to say I haven't tried it yet, not worth the risk.
|
January 9, 2016, 03:52 PM | #8 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
||
January 11, 2016, 09:31 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
|
Borrow a buddy's Winchester 67, then use standard velocity .22lr. I think you'll find it is just about as quiet as your cans can do.
__________________
As always, YMMV. __________________________________________ MIIAA SIFE |
|
|