The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 13, 2009, 01:52 PM   #1
boy412
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 30, 2009
Posts: 118
Redding powder measures

I'm looking at two Redding powder measures. Would the 3BR with the pistol metering insert be equal to the 10X in terms of accuracy? I have a 3BR now, but it came with the Universal insert. So now I either return this and get the 10X, or shell out another $40 for the pistol insert.

I'll be measuring mostly large pistol and small rifle loads. If the insert will be as good then I have no problem buying one, but if the 10X (which is purpose built for smaller charges) is better somehow then that's what I want.

Thanks!
__________________
Savage 12 LRPV
Dan Wesson PM-7 Bi-Tone
Rock-Ola M1 Carbine
boy412 is offline  
Old September 13, 2009, 04:49 PM   #2
wncchester
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2002
Posts: 2,832
Redding's pistol chamber is made to measure small charges The unversal chamber will measure anything but is supposed to be slightly less consistant with really small charges.

I'd like to have the pistol chamber but the universal is good enough for anything I shoot. Don't think my pistol loads would be any better even if I weighed them individually so I save the money for more powder, etc.
wncchester is offline  
Old September 13, 2009, 06:04 PM   #3
SQUAREKNOT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 16, 2008
Posts: 263
I have the same Redding unit as you do. I just ordered the pistol chamber from Midwayusa. The "big" standard unit works very well with powders like W231. I ran a test of 25 dumps with Blue Dot and also Unique. Shooting for a 6.0gr load or Unique there was some wild charges-as much as .5gr high and low.
Blue Dot did a bit better but I was using an 8.00gr or 9.00gr test dump.
The unit will not ship for another week so I can't report on how it did.
I was also using W231 and it metered perfectly in the large chamber. What I did discover was W231 pressures load up fast with heavy for cal. bullets and coupled with the use of Winchester primers "FOR STANDARD OR MAGNUM LOADS" even midrange loads flattened the primers pretty bad.
SQUAREKNOT is offline  
Old September 13, 2009, 06:43 PM   #4
boy412
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 30, 2009
Posts: 118
Right now I'm using W231 as well. Let us know how the pistol drum works out!

Can you please elaborate on the interaction of the primers you're using and the powder? I have those same primers too.
__________________
Savage 12 LRPV
Dan Wesson PM-7 Bi-Tone
Rock-Ola M1 Carbine
boy412 is offline  
Old September 15, 2009, 08:02 AM   #5
SQUAREKNOT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 16, 2008
Posts: 263
Can you please elaborate on the interaction of the primers

I called the W231 manufacturer and he stated that Winchester primers are for standard or magnum and are therefore magnum primers. 175gr in .40 and 230 gr
in .45 were showing flattened primers at midrange and even starting loads. This went away when I tried CCI LP primers. HE said that ball powders are harder to fire up so they use the hotter primers. I have never run into this before. I appears to me the new WLP are hotter than before ??
SQUAREKNOT is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03810 seconds with 8 queries