The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 17, 2009, 08:17 AM   #1
stacks04
Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2009
Posts: 62
underpressure signs

load data-
45acp
230gn hornady fmj.
mixed brass
federal 150 primers
4.6gr of titegroup

hey guys i am curious to figure out why my latest batch of loads left the target dirty with soot. it was spotty soot/powder particles all over the target i was using. the load shot very accurate, i made 30 rnds and shot out the middle of the target. not great distances but 20-40 ft range. the cases look to dirty like pressure is going by them. the gun fires fine, and is not dirty internally. i shot in 5 rnd groups and never had a ftf or fte. min loads were 4.4 and max is 4.8 gr. the 4.4 shot horrible and saw similar results with the cases being dirty. so i went up to 4.6 grn. i will try the 4.8 grn max load next and see if it helps anything. thanks guys.
stacks04 is offline  
Old October 17, 2009, 08:34 AM   #2
Dragon55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2009
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 811
What was your OAL??
Did you crimp?


Most report cleanliness with Titegroup at that charge(4.6).
__________________
sailing ... A way to spend lots of money and go real S L O W
Dragon55 is offline  
Old October 17, 2009, 09:50 AM   #3
stacks04
Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2009
Posts: 62
oal was set to hornady loading guide. dont remember off hand. and yes i crimped using the lee factory crimp guide. maybe not enough?
i ran the first batch i made though both my 1911 by racking the slide to chamber and expel a few unprimed rounds set to length and crimped to make sure the slide and ramp did not further seat the bullet in the case. they did not in either gun so i used that as my crimp guide. i did this from no crimp and adjusted to where its crimped today where the oal length did not change.
stacks04 is offline  
Old October 17, 2009, 10:23 AM   #4
Tomas204
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 144
well getting groups from 1 foot does not make you a better shooter ,I have no idea just wanted ta be a SA
Tomas204 is offline  
Old October 17, 2009, 10:36 AM   #5
stacks04
Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2009
Posts: 62
thanks tomas
stacks04 is offline  
Old October 17, 2009, 10:43 AM   #6
Dragon55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2009
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 811
Titegroup is one of the faster powders so I too don't understand what you had..... which sounds like late burning or no burning powder.

You sound like you know what you're talking about.... probably more so than me.

I'm sure you feel good about the quality of your powder and primers..... I'm just thinking moisture.... age.... contaminants etc.

I use Bullseye for almost everything and have never had your issues. Only residue I ever get is a little bit of soot at forcing cone. Bullseye is only just a small fraction faster than Titegroup. You're loading basically at midrange and below so I'm puzzled as well....................
__________________
sailing ... A way to spend lots of money and go real S L O W
Dragon55 is offline  
Old October 17, 2009, 10:54 AM   #7
Dragon55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2009
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 811
Oh yeah.......

One more thing.......

What do your primers look like after firing???? Still flat??? Or do they look like they are 'bulging' ??
__________________
sailing ... A way to spend lots of money and go real S L O W
Dragon55 is offline  
Old October 17, 2009, 08:09 PM   #8
TEDDY
Junior member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2006
Location: MANNING SC
Posts: 837
45

he is probably not burning well.I just cant see all the powders when there are tried and tru loads.I dont use bullseye but would I use 700X which is much the same and 3,6 gr with 200 gr SWC.plinking I cant see wasting expensive jackets.I have shot that load for 30 yrs in compitition.its 10 ring at 50 yds.
TEDDY is offline  
Old November 3, 2009, 03:18 PM   #9
stacks04
Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2009
Posts: 62
okay guys, sorry to bring this back up, i finally had time to do a real thorough cleaning on this gun. i found a stain in the chamber so to speak that matches the cases used in my test loads perfect. i am thinking now that it just isnt sealing good enough around the case. i cleaned the chamber really well and am going to make up some loads again to recheck it. i really had to look to see it, with the barrel in my hands i could not see it with out a flash light. once i get to the range i will report back.
stacks04 is offline  
Old November 3, 2009, 04:13 PM   #10
TATER
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 963
Double check your scale.
I have been using TiteGroup for about 10 years now.
It is extremely clean burning powder when loaded at the upper end.
It is dirty as Heck at the lower end. My load for 230 grain JHPs happens
to be 4.8 grains. My load for 185 grain JHPs is 5.3 to 5.5 and by no means are they Hot loads.
My loads are used in all my .45s. They being two 1911s, HK USP Tac. and a Baby Eagle.
Be Safe.
TATER is offline  
Old November 3, 2009, 05:20 PM   #11
Jeff H
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 20, 2009
Posts: 176
Quote:
okay guys, sorry to bring this back up, i finally had time to do a real thorough cleaning on this gun. i found a stain in the chamber so to speak that matches the cases used in my test loads perfect. i am thinking now that it just isnt sealing good enough around the case. i cleaned the chamber really well and am going to make up some loads again to recheck it. i really had to look to see it, with the barrel in my hands i could not see it with out a flash light. once i get to the range i will report back.


Do your cases look similar to these?



These are mine shooting 4.6g of bullseye under a 200g LSWC, I took the pic thinking the same thing as you: the case wasn't sealing. But most replies over at 1911forum seem to indicate this is normal.

Last edited by Jeff H; November 3, 2009 at 05:27 PM.
Jeff H is offline  
Old November 3, 2009, 07:22 PM   #12
Russ5924
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 18, 2005
Posts: 1,874
Look like mine but using 4.3 of W231 with a 200G SWC
__________________
Russ5924
Russ5924 is offline  
Old November 4, 2009, 08:35 AM   #13
stacks04
Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2009
Posts: 62
they had some similar looks but the one i was after was a distinct long stain. i will see if i have any picks of what it looked like. it has been cleaned out and hopefully will solve my problem.
stacks04 is offline  
Old November 4, 2009, 08:51 AM   #14
SL1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 8, 2007
Posts: 2,001
My .40 S&Ws look like that

until I work the charge up to high enough pressure to seal the case against the chamber wall. Even then, some powders are cleaner than others. Some powders seem to "stain" cases as well as leave black smudges. Others just leave the black stuff. A few (e.g., "Clays") leave almost nothing at high enough pressure. (But, "Clays" is touchy with high pressure and heavy bullets.)

I don't use Titegroup or shoot .45 ACPs, so I can't comment on our particular load.

SL1
SL1 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07903 seconds with 10 queries