|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 16, 2015, 08:07 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,171
|
H.R. 2283 - Bill to regulate/restrict sale of ammunition
Has anyone been monitoring this?
From what I can tell, just skimming over the bill, it would require a license for selling ammunition, all sales would have to be done face to face and would also require the reporting of bulk ammo purchases of 1k rounds or more to unlicensed persons. What are the chances of this actually passing? https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-...ouse-bill/2283 |
May 16, 2015, 08:24 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
|
The bill has 30 co-sponsors: All are the usual anti-gun suspects. Rep. Bonnie Coleman is pandering to her anti-gun base.
H. R. 2283 stands a one percent chance of becoming law. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/hr2283 |
May 16, 2015, 11:50 PM | #3 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
They couldn't even come up with a better name than the "Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act of 2015." Usually, it's something less obvious. After all, the Senate bill for universal background checks was called the "Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act." See? That's sneaky. The House version was the "Public Safety and Second Amendment Rights Protection Act." Why, who wouldn't support that? Meh. I'm being snarky because I'm really not worried about this one. Why? Because it runs up against FOPA on a couple of points, and it's just too onerous to be sold as "moderate."
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
May 17, 2015, 01:04 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 22, 2013
Posts: 1,277
|
Something that I always wonder about, when it comes to these types of restrictions or proposed restrictions, is what is considered ammo. Are reloading components considered ammo? I guess it varies from state to state.
For example, in restrictive states like New York and New Jersey, is it illegal to have brass casings? How about projectiles?
__________________
Sent from Motorola DynaTac 8000x |
May 17, 2015, 09:27 AM | #5 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,813
|
Not sure about NY and NJ, but I have heard that in MA everything requires the proper FOID (or whatever they call it). BB guns, guns, ammo, components, etc.
FIRED CASES. Ironic to me that the same place that had a "Tea Party" over government taxes and interfering in private lives now requires a permit (or face penalty of law) for a tiny piece of scrap metal. (if this is incorrect, please enlighten me)
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
May 17, 2015, 11:34 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
|
Look for the factory-sealed 999 round case of ammo in short order.
|
May 17, 2015, 12:20 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,323
|
I can't imagine this bill getting a majority in the House or Senate. It may not even get out of committee.
|
May 20, 2015, 09:38 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: December 29, 2008
Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 89
|
Take this serious
No one thought that Obamacare would go through.
Take everyone of these attempts serious. You need to act on this one the same as you did on the XM855 5.56 (greentips) banning. These people need to get banged around every time, they try something like this, like the ATF did on the XM855 attempt. If you don’t they will continue to try until they get something passed (Obamacare).
__________________
RMC Florida Keys |
May 21, 2015, 11:50 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 22, 2013
Posts: 1,277
|
Interesting. Will never pass.
__________________
Sent from Motorola DynaTac 8000x |
May 22, 2015, 11:58 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,236
|
I've heard many people say that about many laws that did get passed.
Someone pumps enough money into a cause, it will pass. If you want to protect your interests, you must invest money. Money gets laws passed. Donate as much money as you can afford into causes you support. Take out adds with your own money
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!! |
May 22, 2015, 01:04 PM | #11 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
The bill contains this little jewel, my emphasis underlined: Quote:
More concisely, how would a large retailer with multiple locations keep track of who bought more than 1,000rds within 5 days, possibly at multiple stores, and consistently deliver the reports to local LE while depending on an unpredictable low-wage workforce? The real-world effect is that EVERY big-box discounter would have to drop ammo sales to avoid repeatedly violating of this asinine law. They are NOT going to like doing this. They are certain to realize this and fight this ridiculous proposal. Frankly, I think this bill is empty partisan posturing, and I likewise predict it will go nowhere.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak Last edited by carguychris; May 22, 2015 at 03:22 PM. |
||
May 22, 2015, 02:28 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 15, 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,416
|
^^^ Right. Additionally, what's to stop someone, and how would it get reported if you buy from several different retailers? Dicks one day, Academy, Bass Pro...
|
May 22, 2015, 03:32 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
The point also isn't to track criminals by ammo sales records. This has proven to be quixotic every time and place it's been tried. The point is to prompt retailers to stop selling ammunition by drowning them in paperwork violations. However, the bill is so blatant in how it would go about this that IMHO there's no way to label it as anything but posturing. I think it's clear that the sponsors submitted the bill in bad faith.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
May 22, 2015, 04:09 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,236
|
I594 passed, and is UNrnforcible
Same for oregon. Lots of laws on the books people thought would never pass and causes a huge inconvenience to those affected. Especially gun laws. Don't let your guard down is all I am saying
__________________
Woohoo, I’m back In Texas!!! |
May 22, 2015, 05:02 PM | #15 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
Logistically? The report would have to be handled the same way multiple handgun reports are, by one employee who has to devote a significant amount of time (and therefore, payroll) to the task.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
May 22, 2015, 09:52 PM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: December 29, 2008
Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 89
|
Take everyone of these attempts serious.
You guys are missing my point or maybe I was not clear enough. You are looking at this with too much... logical rationale and commonsense.
These people that are pushing to overturn the 2A are using the Cloward–Piven political strategy. They want to overburden the gun and ammo industries until they collapse on their own, then their problem with the 2A is fixed without a fight. The way to stop this is to affix to their little brains; that the 2A, guns and ammo are the true third rail and every time they make these attempts at the 2A they get zapped. That is why I am saying “Take this serious”. These people will not stop unless they get punished every time they take a shot at the 2A. These people are also using a method called “cutting the pie”, they cut out one piece of the pie at a time (xm855, black rifles, etc) and before you know it, the pie is gone.
__________________
RMC Florida Keys Last edited by Evan Thomas; May 23, 2015 at 07:43 PM. Reason: left/right politics. |
May 23, 2015, 09:32 AM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
|
Quote:
Some of the co-signers have other serious baggage. One is an impeached federal judge who ran for congress, was elected and has been repeatedly re-elected. By signing onto to this bill these representatives are doing what their constituents want. How will we "punish" anti-gun legislators who represent anti-gun districts? |
|
May 23, 2015, 06:10 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: December 29, 2008
Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 89
|
thallub:
Make your representatives "punish" them. De-fund them, have your representatives vote to de-fund them.
__________________
RMC Florida Keys Last edited by Evan Thomas; May 23, 2015 at 07:44 PM. Reason: partisan politics. |
May 23, 2015, 06:36 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 3,047
|
Quote:
Tractor Supply sends me a statement at the end of each year itemizing every purchase I made If you have to show ID to make the purchase, keeping the records is as simple as posting on this site
__________________
One shot, one kill |
|
May 23, 2015, 07:53 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
I've edited a couple of posts, and I'll remind y'all that discussion of partisan politics is against the rules of this forum. We don't do left-right politics here; pro- and anti-gun people come in all political persuasions, and it's counter-productive to alienate people who do support gun rights just because we may disagree with them about other things.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
|
|