|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 12, 2001, 09:38 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2000
Posts: 2,456
|
Here's a research question for you.
In "The Valley of Fear", Sherlock Holmes finds a sawed-off shotgun and identifies it as being made by the Pennsylvania Small Arms Company. I'm working on a presentation on guns in the Sherlock Holmes stories and would like to know whether this was a real company. Any help would be appreciated. |
May 12, 2001, 10:20 AM | #2 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: January 8, 1999
Location: Brunswick,GA USA
Posts: 1,884
|
DAVID:
I don't have a listing, Cross Over List, Trade Names list, for the Penn. Arms Co. This does not mean that it doesn't of did not exist. You may try and enclycopedia or even on the search. HJN |
May 12, 2001, 10:30 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2000
Posts: 2,456
|
Harley,
Thanks, I did a web search and the only references to "Pennsylvania Small Arms" tied back to the Sherlock story. I thought that an out of business company might not have had any web references. If any other gun-history buffs have any input, I'd be glad. |
May 12, 2001, 09:25 PM | #4 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Hi, guys,
Since Doyle was not especially knowledgeable on either guns or Pennsylvania, and since he was writing fiction*, I have no doubt that the "Pennsylvania Small Arms Company" was a fictional name, made up to sound authoritative. This is like modern fiction writers who show off their gun "expertise" by writing about ".45mm" pistols, "automatic revolvers", guns with short "nozzles", "telescoping sites" (on the web, perhaps), and ".30-30 Remington" bolt actions (Ian Fleming, when there was at that time no such thing). * While I have read every one of the Sherlock Holmes stories and they are among my favorites, I do not accept the idea that SH was a real person. I am just not that much of a Sherlockian, I guess. Jim |
May 13, 2001, 12:15 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2000
Posts: 2,456
|
Quote:
|
|
May 14, 2001, 05:39 AM | #6 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 13, 1999
Location: Columbia, Md, USA
Posts: 8,811
|
David, one story has the villain using a sawed off shotgun with the triggers wired together for greater effect.
Another, possibly "A Study in Scarlet", has Holmes sitting in his rooms and decorating the wall with a patriotic VR, done with a revolver and "Boxer" cartridges, without other damage. The Red Headed League story has Holmes telling Watson to slip his Army revolver into his coat pocket. It takes a very large pocket to hide a Webley with a 5-6 inch bbl. Doyle was a very good writer and I've enjoyed his stories again and again. But, gun cognizant he wasn't, at least when he wrote the Holmes stuff. |
May 14, 2001, 04:48 PM | #7 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2000
Posts: 2,456
|
Quote:
And this has been known to happen. No one says bad guys are super smart. Quote:
Watson didn't describe the damage, only that Mrs. Hudson had to put up with a lot of crap. Doyle was trying to show that Holmes was eccentric. Maybe Holmes didn't know much about guns, but IMHO Doyle did. Quote:
Have you seen the kind of coats you have to wear in British weather? I've seen period clothes, and the coat pockets are huge. In point of fact, the Webley RIC version was available with 2.5 or 4 inch barrels. Quote:
"The tool and its maker are never identical." -- Conan Doyle. Just because his characters did some irrational stuff doesn't mean Doyle didn't know it was irrational. |
||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|