The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 2, 2012, 10:45 PM   #1
Regolith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 30, 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 400
Marble's rear sight on a 10/22?

Will Marble's carbine-style rear sights fit on a 10/22? I have a similar rear sight (except normal length) on a different .22 and I really like them, so I was thinking about getting another to replace the crappy factory rear sight on my 10/22.

If it does fit, would it be necessary to replace the front sight too, or would it work with the factory one?
Regolith is offline  
Old July 3, 2012, 10:05 AM   #2
PetahW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 4,678
The Ruger has a standard 3/8" female dovetail in the barrel, the same size as the male dovetail on that Marble's sight - so it should fit, albeit with maybe some slight fitting needed.

Although the Ruger's not listed as befitting, if you install the Marble's, then target the rifle, you'll soon find out if the rifle will zero with the issue height front sight blade, which is easy enough to swap out for one taller/shorter.

.
PetahW is offline  
Old July 3, 2012, 10:25 AM   #3
Pahoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
A better mouse trap.

Quote:
replace the crappy factory rear sight on my 10/22.
Wow, if you don't like this sight and still want the open sight, why not go to a peep sight that would be better than the Marbles. ...

As usual, your money and your call. .....

Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing.
Pahoo is offline  
Old July 3, 2012, 10:58 AM   #4
saltydog452
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 2004
Posts: 516
aftermarket sights and declining vision sharpness on irons

I replaced my 10-22 Rifle and Carbine sights with units from reputable companies that were advertised to 'fit'.

They did fit as advertised. Fact is, they didn't have the same inpact location as the originals. It was necessary to mix and match in order to get the aiming point to match the hit area. Shipping cost was more costly than buying cost of various sight height sights of the same model.

It was pretty much the same journey with the Marlin 39 with 66MC and 17AHB sight combination.

Both journeys were fun but were somewhat frustrating and educational.

salty
saltydog452 is offline  
Old July 3, 2012, 04:10 PM   #5
Regolith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 30, 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 400
Quote:
Wow, if you don't like this sight and still want the open sight, why not go to a peep sight that would be better than the Marbles. ...
Because I'm used to that style of rear sight. Pretty much all the rifles I shot when I was growing up that had iron sights up were semi-buckhorn style. Because of this I find it to be much faster to use than a peep-sight, which I'm not used to, and is accurate enough in the ranges that I use a .22 rifle (I rarely shoot farther than 50 yards with a .22) to make the speed tradeoff of the peep sight not worth it.

Also, it's much cheaper than any decent peep sights I can find on the market, even if I have to change out the front sight too, and my 10/22 is stock so it isn't a target rifle anyway.
Regolith is offline  
Old July 6, 2012, 04:35 PM   #6
bmjp
Member
 
Join Date: April 29, 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 27
Try these.... http://www.tech-sights.com/
__________________
NRA
US ARMY Veteran
CCFSA
bmjp is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03803 seconds with 8 queries