The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 27, 2020, 04:48 AM   #1
Pond, James Pond
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
Is there any reason the Lee PPM shouldn't be used with BP?

As the title suggests.

I have a Lee Perfect Powder Measure. I don't use it. I have a Lyman Gen 6 and VV powders metered badly out of the Lee.

But if I can get BP, is there any reason not to use it for charging purposes?
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Pond, James Pond is offline  
Old November 27, 2020, 09:20 AM   #2
JT-AR-MG42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 27, 2008
Posts: 555
I could probably google a Lee measure, but instead I'll assume they are plastic with a 'useful life window' that is in direct sight.
I've used a few of their molds and had success, but would not consider most of their products due to my personal experience and observations.
I like to buy once.

I would not use any plastic measures due to concerns over static electricity (but am sure some folks do).

I would recommend either using a black powder pencil type adjustable measure or even a BP
pistol powder flask if you cannot make a scoop from a 45-70 case with a copper handle brazed on.

If the loads are for your breech loader (paper cartridges) no drop tubing is necessary anyway, so
you would not be losing any reloading speed.

Hope you are able to get black powder. A gunsmith friend of mine has helped quite a few people
shooting inline cap guns after they met with lackluster BP substitute groups.
All were new to muzzleloaders and were amazed at how accurate a BP charge was and how simple cleaning was as well.

JT
__________________
I hunt not to kill, but rather to have not played golf...

Last edited by JT-AR-MG42; November 27, 2020 at 09:29 AM.
JT-AR-MG42 is offline  
Old November 27, 2020, 11:11 AM   #3
Pahoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
NO

Quote:
Is there any reason the Lee PPM shouldn't be used with BP?
Simply stated; NO ......

Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing.
Pahoo is offline  
Old November 27, 2020, 12:56 PM   #4
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pond, James Pond View Post
As the title suggests.
if I can get BP, is there any reason not to use it for charging purposes?
No reason not to. BP can't be set off by static electricity.
Hawg is offline  
Old November 27, 2020, 02:38 PM   #5
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
BP is measured in grains by volume not mass. Give Lee a call and ask 'em.
https://leeprecision.com/contact-us.html
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old November 27, 2020, 04:25 PM   #6
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,537
So when the Sharps Rifle Co. said around 1880, "For fine shooting, powder should be weighed on a scale." they were wrong?

I don't worry about static electricity on a plastic measure igniting powder, they ship even black powder in plastic cans now.

But static cling is a great annoyance. My BP measure is a Redding with a metal hopper... double base smokeless destroyed the cheap acrylic factory hopper anyhow. And my plastic PACT scale pan is coated with graphite mold release.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old November 27, 2020, 07:59 PM   #7
Pahoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
If you know the basics, you have the answer !!!!!

Quote:
So when the Sharps Rifle Co. said around 1880, "For fine shooting, powder should be weighed on a scale." they were wrong?
"Come on, man" You know the answer to that question and of course, they are not wrong and no one is saying that. ......

Be Safe !!!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing.
Pahoo is offline  
Old November 27, 2020, 08:16 PM   #8
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,283
When shooting with black powder,filling the space completely, no air gaps trumps charge weight,

As far as static or any other hazard, I'd bet Lee can give you better info than my opinion.
Contact them
HiBC is offline  
Old November 27, 2020, 09:31 PM   #9
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. O'Heir
BP is measured in grains by volume not mass.
Grains is a unit of mass, not volume. Since it isn't possible to measure mass by volume, your statement requires clarification.

The Perfect Powder Measure doesn't measure mass (or weight). In fact, it doesn't "measure" anything. It is set to discharge a specific volume with each stroke. So if black powder is to be dispensed by volume, just set the PPM to discharge the required volume. But you'll need some sort of calibrated device that measures volume. If you want to check the weight, you have to throw a charge into the pan and put the pan on a scale.

Just like with smokeless powder.
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor
NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO
1911 Certified Armorer
Jeepaholic
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old November 27, 2020, 09:34 PM   #10
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
People generally avoid weighing or measuring black powder in equipment that has steel parts due, I suppose, to the potential for ignition. I would not worry about plastic parts.

Measuring scales used to have brass pans. My late 1970s RCBS 10-10 scale does, at least.

If you are worried about weighing powder BP charges, you can make powder dippers out of cut off brass cartridge cases using twisted wire in the extractor groove as handles.

Quote:
Grains is a unit of mass, not volume. Since it isn't possible to measure mass by volume, your statement requires clarification.
Grains are not a measure of mass, they are a measure of weight.

Volumetric powder measures have been around for centuries. They are marked by weight for a volume of black powder, sometimes by granulation. Since BP is hygroscopic, powder weight for a given volume could vary depending on weather conditions, but powder volume would always contain nearly the same volume of powder. It's a simple tool, but very effective.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services

Last edited by Scorch; November 27, 2020 at 09:41 PM.
Scorch is offline  
Old November 28, 2020, 08:01 AM   #11
mehavey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,885
Volumetric measures provide consistent amounts of an approximate weight.

The volume's actual weight varies by BP manufacturer, grain size, humidity, phase of the moon, and what you ate for breakfast.

Don't worry....
Be happy.
mehavey is offline  
Old November 28, 2020, 10:23 AM   #12
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,537
I forget, did the OP end up with a "paper cutter" Sharps?
He will be fine with volumetric powder charges, much as the typical hunting muzzleloader.

I have known of target muzzleloading shooters to preweigh a day's loads into pill vials.

My main use of black powder has been in BPCR competition where most shooters weigh their loads like the Sharps Rifle Co told them to do 140 years ago. There are a few who use high end volumetric measures with the care a modern benchrest shooter operates his Harrel or Culver.

The other worry over mechanical measures besides their plastic hoppers is the fear of "striking a spark" with a steel drum in an iron housing. If that bothers you, Hornady and Lyman make rotary BP measures with brass moving parts.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old November 28, 2020, 10:32 AM   #13
Pond, James Pond
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
Thanks for the insights, folks.

As yet, I have no idea if I'll use this but if BP shooting became a realistic option then it might come in handy which beats sitting at the bottom of a box, forever ignored.

And yes, I got a Sharps which, so far, has spent many an evening being polished and cleaned in front of Netflix.

It also featured in rather a splendid impersonation of of Rooster Cogburn as I stood on the sofa during a few scenes from True Grit.... Who says I don't take BP seriously?!
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Pond, James Pond is offline  
Old November 28, 2020, 06:15 PM   #14
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,537
The Sharps Carbine appeared in True Grit with Glen Campbell as Texas Ranger la Bouef.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old November 29, 2020, 03:35 PM   #15
Pond, James Pond
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
True but Rooster impersonations are more satisfying!
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Pond, James Pond is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05749 seconds with 8 queries