|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 9, 2019, 06:48 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
1000 Firearms Collection
Might as well start the discussion. Last night the news reported that police found 1000+ firearms and of course, once again, they called it as an arsenal. They neglected to mention why they raided his home, only that there were over 1000 firearms. today they finally mentioned that they were service a warrant on firearms violations. That's well and good but they just had to lay them out, lay them on sheets and take areal videos of the bust. …..
Until we see due process, it's just a bunch of guns in a man's collection. Most of what I saw were non-tactical but who cares?? …. Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. |
May 9, 2019, 07:12 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
I saw some news blurbs, they stated the raid was for "assault weapon violations" and was a joint CA and ATF operation. Apparently he was suspected of making, selling, loaning, or some other violation of "assault weapon" laws. The big thrust to the news I saw was the apparent shock and horror at finding 1,000 guns in a wealthy upscale CA neighborhood!
The guy might be an illegal arms dealer, or he might be a collector with 1,000 guns, it only takes ONE gun violating the convoluted California law to be a criminal.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
May 10, 2019, 09:33 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,566
|
Someone doesn't like him. They arrested him on a "tip". GUILTY until proven innocent! Sheeeeeesh!
|
May 10, 2019, 10:03 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
Being a suspect, is all it takes ??? !!!
Quote:
Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. |
|
May 10, 2019, 10:14 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 30, 2015
Location: My back yard
Posts: 971
|
One man's collection is another man's arsenal. Any time the media can make a sensational claim about someone's gun collection they will do if it fits their narrative
. |
May 10, 2019, 10:32 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,313
|
Quote:
I remember a debate that included NRA spokesperson Colin Noir where it was brought up (with the aforementioned shock and horror) that a bad guy had many, many firearms. Colin Noir, perplexed and frustrated by the "shock and horror" reaction tried to make the point that the guy could only use one gun at a time. Colin Noir might as well have been speaking Greek. There was no understanding or comprehension in ANY of the other folk there including the moderator. It's like a religious article of faith among the anti-gun crowd. Guns are bad. More guns are more bad. |
|
May 10, 2019, 11:46 AM | #7 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
I too noticed in the photos that a whole lot of the weapons seized, on the surface, are probably compliant with California law. Tons of revolvers, bolt action sporting rifles, shotguns, etc. Some of the reporting has been interesting.
Quote:
Quote:
Source: https://www.foxnews.com/us/ex-getty-...bel-air-estate And this goof-ball for the win... Quote:
__________________
Support the NRA-ILA Auction, ends 03/09/2018 https://thefiringline.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=593946 Last edited by 5whiskey; May 10, 2019 at 11:51 AM. |
|||
May 10, 2019, 12:10 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
This link has some good details, though I've never heard of "variety" so I can't attest to their accuracy...
https://variety.com/2019/biz/news/gi...he-1203210031/ Quote:
I digress, I love firearms and what one does with their personal resources is their own business. But I could not fathom devoting enough resources on that many firearms for me personally. I do occasionally have other interests. So yeah, it's a bit odd. Odd isn't always criminal though.
__________________
Support the NRA-ILA Auction, ends 03/09/2018 https://thefiringline.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=593946 |
|
May 10, 2019, 12:16 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 16, 2007
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 3,888
|
Pictures of the guns shows them just thrown into a pile. CA obviously has no consideration on how they handle or treat the guns. If the owner ever gets them returned they will likely not be in good condition.
|
May 10, 2019, 12:46 PM | #10 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
Quote:
Cops are under no compulsion to treat evidence as anything, other than ensuring proper chain of custody, to prevent "contamination". SO, yes, they can treat precious objects like cord wood, and often do, as we see. IF the guy wins and is exonerated, he MAY get his guns back. OR the state may keep them (and destroy them) and just cut him a check for the value of the property. It could take a separate court fight to get his guns back, in what ever condition they wind up in... They have done it before...
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
May 10, 2019, 12:57 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
Not charged ???
Quote:
Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. |
|
May 10, 2019, 01:05 PM | #12 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
Quote:
Or the guy might have a full FFL but he was selling an occasional "machine gun". Stay tuned. Just remember that pretty much nobody in "the media" has any comprehension of how federal firearms licensing works, or that there are several different types on FFLs. |
||
May 10, 2019, 08:04 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,478
|
And horror of horrors, he owned ".50 caliber Barrett machine gun rifles".
So most people now think he had .50 caliber machine guns. Something like this circus happened a year or two ago in California with the blaring headlines and pictures of evil guns pilled up. NOT widely reported was some months later the guns were very quietly returned because they were all legal. No reporters or TV cameras showed up for that. |
May 11, 2019, 01:37 PM | #14 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
Quote:
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
May 11, 2019, 06:37 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 13, 2013
Location: N. Georgia
Posts: 1,150
|
Regarding little or no publicity if a gun owner gets his property back:
Wisely, it's best not to advertise, esepcially if a large collection, as that publicity can paint a bullseye on the home's door for all the thieves who do deal in gun trafficking. |
May 11, 2019, 07:58 PM | #16 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
Quote:
I have some understanding of the difficulties in creating and wining a criminal case, and losing a case doesn't necessarily meant those bringing it were incompetent, but it sure does make them seem that way to the general public. And, if they don't lose the case, if it gets tossed out before trial, then to me, they are incompetent, to a degree, for bringing the charges in the first place. it may, or may not be malfeasance, but it certainly is misfeasance... Is that DA the guy or gal you want to re-elect? Or vote for if they run for another office?
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
May 11, 2019, 09:15 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,657
|
Quote:
Now Let’s say you bought 10 c&r guns last year, then got a once in a lifetime opportunity at something like an original 1853 enfield still in fireable condition? You sell all of the other firearms you bought, plus a few more, maybe at a profit on some of them. All of the proceeds then go to the original enfield. Mr atf comes and checks, sees that you bought 10 rifles and sold all 10 (some at a profit). It would look an awful lot like you may be doing something screwy. If mr atf is reasonable (and many agents are... but some aren’t), he will understand when you explain and show him the original enfield. There’s always the one though... All this to say, I wouldn’t want to be responsible for trying to make a case on a c&r boundbook front. The license holder may be the devil and running gunds for the Mexican mafia, if they use a little bit of sense trying to cover and explain their tracks it would be hard to make a case. Then you have the guys trying to prosecute the guy who just wanted to buy his enfield.
__________________
Support the NRA-ILA Auction, ends 03/09/2018 https://thefiringline.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=593946 |
|
May 12, 2019, 05:05 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 8, 2015
Posts: 908
|
Quote:
|
|
May 12, 2019, 02:43 PM | #19 |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Lot's of speculation and pretty much no facts.
No one seems to know what the gun owner was charged with, if anything, or what the legal basis for the seizure might be. And it's entirely possible that there was a good reason. It's also entirely possible that there was not. Folks here are most disposed to believe that there was no legal basis for the seizure, but a belief is not evidence. Without some reliable facts there's nothing to discuss.
__________________
"It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper |
July 16, 2019, 11:01 AM | #20 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
news update
Quote:
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
July 16, 2019, 11:42 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2013
Location: North Central Pennsyltucky
Posts: 749
|
Only a firearm enthusiast can understand why we have many (and multiples) of guns/calibers. I am also a hobbyist woodworker and collector of handtools-am I a criminal because I have dozens of smoothing planes? Hundreds of plumb bobs?
|
July 16, 2019, 02:22 PM | #22 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,839
|
Quote:
What I find most depressing is that other than the short barrel weapon and destructive device charges, none of the others were crimes 30 years ago. and many of them aren't crimes outside the state of California, today. What the heck is assault weapon/.50 BMG rifle activity, anyway?? Shooting them? The guy may have been "engaging in the business" without the right licenses or exceeding the licenses he had, that's possible. I see no crime of violence charges, it all seems to be "technical" type stuff, but breaking stupid laws is just as much a crime as breaking just laws, so, there you go.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
|
|