December 17, 2017, 11:31 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2009
Location: Unity, Nh
Posts: 143
|
3" vs. 2.75" buckshot
Been having trouble finding the 3" Remington 000 buckshot I love to shoot in my 870 Tactical, so I've been thinking of dropping back to the 2.75" Remington 000 buckshot.
My question for y'all is............. Would you feel under powered in a defensive exchange, at 12 to 15 yards* by dropping back to the 2.75" 000 buckshot load...vs. the 3" 000 buckshot load? The 870 is my travel/camping shotgun, and I take an undisclosed amount of spare shells with me. *My personal belief is after 15yds, it's handgun(1911, Glock, or AR pistol) time.*
__________________
live free or die! |
December 18, 2017, 12:47 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,967
|
Not at all.
|
December 18, 2017, 08:09 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,209
|
My HD shotguns don't even have 3" chambers, good old 9 pellet OO buck has been doing the trick for over 100 years.
And get some federal "flight control" buck and/or slugs and it turns your 15 yard limit to more like 50.
__________________
rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6 Quote:
|
|
December 18, 2017, 10:05 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,296
|
2-3/4" #1 is my preference. Inside 15 yards with 000, would not think it would make much of a difference at all.
|
December 18, 2017, 10:56 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,604
|
No.
__________________
Time Travelers' Wisdom: Never Do Yesterday What Should Be Done Tomorrow. If At Last You Do Succeed, Never Try Again. |
December 18, 2017, 11:00 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,792
|
I'd consider 2 3/4" loads as an improvement.
The only time I find 3" shells of any help is with steel shot. To be effective you normally have to go up about 2 shot sizes when comparing steel to lead. The 3" shells help get the pellet count back up to a reasonable number.
__________________
"If you're still doing things the same way you were doing them 10 years ago, you're doing it wrong" Winston Churchill |
December 18, 2017, 11:09 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 31, 2017
Location: Va., Ct., Mo..
Posts: 860
|
if 2 3/4" buck is good enough for our troops, id go with 2 3/4" too.
__________________
Retired Military Aviation Former Member Navy Shooting Team Distinguished Pistol Shot,NRA Shotgun/Pistol Instructor NSSA All American, Skeet/Trap Range Owner |
December 18, 2017, 05:05 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 5, 2012
Location: Carthage, NY
Posts: 231
|
Not a bit. If the bad guy wasn't satisfied with nine 00 buck pellets I'd just send him another nine.
|
December 18, 2017, 07:27 PM | #9 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
|
The 3" #1 Buck 24 pellet load might be the best overall personal defense load ever made for the 12 gauge shotgun. That's a massive payload, nearly triple the pellet of a standard police 00 load, but the pellets are only slightly smaller at .30 cal vs 00 .33 cal.
|
December 18, 2017, 07:32 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2012
Location: ME
Posts: 768
|
Quote:
Agreed... I only use 3” for hunting, and even then, it wasn’t that big of a difference. Don’t hunt too much anymore, but didn’t even see the need to move to 3.5” when both my 11-87s were 3”. I like the 3” ability, but not because I regularly shoot them. Rather be able to shoot whatever I have on hand, if need be. |
|
December 18, 2017, 08:57 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 7, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 273
|
For general purpose / defense outdoor use try Flite Control cartridges.
Federal Flite-Control Buckshot put tight patterns and cylinder bore in the same sentence! Three inch 12 pellet 00B @ 1325 from industry test barrels. https://www.midwayusa.com/product/10...tecontrol-wad# For outdoor defense buckshot against large predators go with Dixie Tri-Ball: http://www.dixieslugs.com/products.html |
December 18, 2017, 10:25 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2009
Location: Unity, Nh
Posts: 143
|
Thanks guys!!! I truly value the input!
__________________
live free or die! |
December 19, 2017, 02:37 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,273
|
agreed
Less recoil and flash with the standard 2-3/4 load, allowing faster follow up. The three inch shell can be a real thumper and it's slightly added wallop doesn't really matter at SD shotgun ranges. Heck, some LE outfits have gone to a low recoil, 8 pellet 00 load.
|
December 20, 2017, 11:28 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 7, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 273
|
Federal Flite-Control Buckshot put tight patterns and cylinder bore in the same sentence!
Three inch 12 pellet 00B @ 1325 from industry test barrels. https://www.midwayusa.com/product/10...tecontrol-wad# Note: The 3" twelve pellet 00B Flite-Control round is a 1 & 3/8 ounce, (600 grain), load. The low recoil 8 pellet 2.75" version of the 00B Flite-Control round is a 9/10 ounce load. The 3" Dixie Tri-Ball is a 2.2 ounce load. Dixie Tri-Ball: http://www.dixieslugs.com/products.html |
December 20, 2017, 01:38 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 22, 2009
Posts: 307
|
I’d stick with 2 3/4 OOO Buck. The recoil is lighter, but eight .36 caliber lead balls sure make a mess of the intended target.
|
December 21, 2017, 10:02 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 7, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 273
|
|
December 22, 2017, 09:43 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 22, 2009
Posts: 307
|
|
December 22, 2017, 09:49 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2017
Posts: 351
|
3" shells use the same amount of powder at the 2.75. So the same amount of powder
is going to drive the 2.75 shot harder... |
December 22, 2017, 01:16 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
If you're in a firefight at 12 to 15 yards, you're already in a pickle. You'll have no time to think or worry about it.
Difference between 3" and 2.75" is the number of pellets and the recoil. Both felt and actual recoil. However, if you're going to use a 3" Mag, you're better off with #4 buck. Gives you 41 6mm pellets. 27 pellets in a 2.75" shell. Vs 10 of 000 buck. "...your 15 yard limit to more like 50..." Using plain rifled slugs out of a smooth bore with rifle sights, you can expect 2" to 3" groups at 100 yards. "...Remington states .36 caliber on the box..." Calibre is flexible to the manufacturers. .36 calibre can be .375–.380 inch diameter. .38 calibre is .357" diameter.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
December 22, 2017, 02:27 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,273
|
#4 buck
Aside from the fact that the OP was inquiring regards 00 or 000 buck, I can't agree with the suggestion for #4B as a GP buckshot load. Quite a few agencies went to #4 buck in the late 70's, early 80's. Then they shot a few felons with the stuff, and the results were not all that impressive. I believe nearly all switched back to larger buck within the decade.
Those 6mm pellets do give one a higher pellet count, but less mass which effects penetration. Lengthen the distance of your SD shots, or add an outer garment, and #4 buck may not do so well. |
December 22, 2017, 06:21 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
I suppose my biggest reservation about shooting 000 buckshot in a 2-3/4" shell is 5 or 6 pellets of 000 vs 9 or 10 pellets of 00 buckshot. Since you are talking 15 yds, pattern size is not really a consideration, and energy is still very high for the smaller shot size. So pattern the gun with both and choose what shoots the best.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
December 22, 2017, 11:42 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2009
Location: Unity, Nh
Posts: 143
|
I consider ANYTHING after 15yds AR-15 time! I've shot plenty of living and non-living things with shotguns over the years, and know at what ranges a 18" or 20" barrel with cyl. bore choke( and other lengths and chokes) will do and won't do. Although I carry slugs in a side saddle or speed feed stock, I feel they only are needed out to the 50 yard line....when nothing else is handy. Nevermind the legal aspects of a justified shooting at 150 feet.
I've always considered the home defense shotgun as a close quarters defensive weapon, and that is what I base my tactics on. Thank you all for your input.
__________________
live free or die! |
December 23, 2017, 03:59 AM | #23 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
|
Quote:
In PRACTICAL use, the maximum effective range for buckshot against human targets is approx. 25 yards, and roughly 50 yards for slugs. After that, and a .223 weapons platform makes eminently more tactical sense, able to reach out to 600 yards or more with ease and incredible accuracy with low recoil and rapid follow up shots. |
|
December 23, 2017, 05:38 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 7, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 273
|
Quote:
What is on the box is the "nominal diameter," which by industry standards can be + .015" Thus the largest "in spec" 00B is .345" and the smallest "in spec" 000B is .345" |
|
December 23, 2017, 05:51 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 7, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 273
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|