February 29, 2016, 05:55 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Justice Thomas speaks
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...-court/471582/
This is rather unusual. The analysis is that: 1. Without Scalia, he feels that he might have to champion the positions that they both held. 2. He feels quite strongly on the basic issue of gun rights being fundamental - which the others clearly don't. The issue is the permanent denial of a right due to a bad action.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
February 29, 2016, 07:45 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2008
Posts: 550
|
I think Justice Thomas asked a legitimate guestion, and one I've never been able to get a straight answer on since Lautenberg got his bill passed.
Regardless, whatever his reason for asking, I'm glad he did. Maybe people will start to look at the Lautenberg Ammendment and guestion it. I've always respected and admired Justice Thomas.
__________________
In my hour of darkness In my time of need Oh Lord grant me vision Oh Lord grant me speed - Gram Parsons |
February 29, 2016, 08:05 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
Very legitimate question, and I think it perfectly highlighted the extreme nature of the law. Permanently banning possession due to this specific misdemeanor assumes that an occurrence of domestic violence (even when intoxicated) is indicative of a permanent condition - that is, nobody can ever pay their debt to society and move on. I think it's hard to make a blanket statement like that.
|
March 1, 2016, 09:58 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2015
Location: Croatia
Posts: 188
|
I would consider that a life-long suspension of any right is not reasonable to apply as a blanket rule.
In my country, there is a very useful mechanism of "rehabilitation", which means that, after the sentence has been served, and after a period of time has passed, provided good behaviour the criminal record will be "cleared" for all purposes and all rights fully reinstated (provided there are no special safety measures in force; eg. you're not going to be rehabilitated if you're undergoing mandatory psychiatric treatment). The length of time required varies from 3 years for minor felonies punishable by a fine or suspended sentence, to 15 years. I find that to be pretty reasonable, especially for minor offenses where nobody was hurt. A mistake in youth shouldn't brand someone for life. |
March 1, 2016, 10:18 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,969
|
this is the only misdemeanor that strips you of a constitutionally protected right, and actual physical violence need not be part of the charge/conviction.
|
March 2, 2016, 05:52 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2011
Posts: 356
|
Most notably, he did not get a straight answer, only avoidance. And that may be the end of it, as the issue was not raised below, such that the doctrine of "constitutional avoidance" will be brought to bear as necessary.
|
March 2, 2016, 06:59 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 11, 2013
Location: High up in the Rocky Moun
Posts: 665
|
I've read several opinions written by Mr. Justice Thomas, and the man is an intellectual giant.
The less he speaks, the more he listens. Like the wise old owl.
__________________
The soldier's pack is not so heavy a burden as the prisoner's chains. Dwight Eisenhower It is very important what a man stands for. But it is far more important what a man refuses to stand for. |
March 4, 2016, 08:36 PM | #8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 16, 2014
Location: Upnorth Minnesota
Posts: 3
|
I read the transcripts of that hearing, and it was really hard to figure out what the case was all about. (except for the part that Thomas spoke up on) everything else seemed to boild down to figuring out what "battery" meant. Once Thomas spoke up, they wound up the discussion quickly before they ended up getting the law pulled.
__________________
Stercus Accidit |
March 5, 2016, 11:52 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
|
Quote:
TCB
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things." -- Alex Rosewater |
|
March 5, 2016, 11:55 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
|
Anyone remember that article from like a year or so back (NY Times, I think) which put forth the theory that Thomas had had a stroke or something, and was physically unable to speak freely in court? Maybe it was Austim, I forget. Talk about derpedy-derp. I think even at the time he was doing lectures and of course writing opinions & giving occasional interviews.
TCB
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things." -- Alex Rosewater |
|
|