|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 12, 2009, 02:05 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: October 30, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 20
|
Lead bullets same as FMJ bullets when reloading?
Folks, I will soon be receiving some 9mm lead bullets. Is it ok to follow the same powder specs as for the FMJ bullets that I've loaded in the past? Other words - Is a 115 gr FMJ bullet the same as a 115 gr lead bullet (same diameter) when it comes to reloading powder specs?
Thanks! |
November 12, 2009, 02:09 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 13, 2008
Posts: 367
|
No, it is not, and you should simply find the manual with the lead bullets data - pretty much every book has it.
|
November 12, 2009, 02:41 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2009
Location: Howell Michigan
Posts: 130
|
Not even close
The pressure difference and velocity is precisely what the jacketing intended to create/handle.
I've never loaded lead bullets, but if memory serves me well the difference is like 1/2 or even less for lead. That's not real data, just saying big big deal that swap is. Also lead bullets will treat your barrel different and leave residue far greater than jacketed bullets will. |
November 12, 2009, 02:50 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 23, 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 228
|
No, they are not the same.
Lead bullets require a lower powder load than FMJ of the same design. Make sure you get some good reloading references, and work up your loads as per usual. |
November 12, 2009, 03:55 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 13,195
|
Another no - and check your manuals ......
in fact some plated bullets, like Berry's and Rainier Ballistics suggest you use lead loading data to load their plated bullets as well ...... vs harder, true jacketed bullets like Montana Gold. |
November 12, 2009, 04:33 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2005
Posts: 1,874
|
When changing any component it is best to start over and work your way back up to what you like
__________________
Russ5924 |
November 12, 2009, 06:01 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
|
It depends, as a general rule lead bullets require less powder than their jacketed counterparts to reach the same velocity.
However some lead bullets cannot be driven as fast as jacketed as their metal is too soft, limiting how much pressure your loads can generate. Hodgdon's website has some good lead loading data.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me. |
November 12, 2009, 06:15 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2002
Location: Transplanted from Montana
Posts: 2,311
|
You really should get a manual or three. If not there ore many onlind data sources shuch as
http://data.hodgdon.com/main_menu.asp Good Shooting!
__________________
I pledge allegiance to the Flag - - -, and to the Republic for which it stands….Our Forefathers were brilliant for giving us a Republic, not a democracy! Do you know the difference??? and WHY?http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissue...les.asp?id=111 |
November 12, 2009, 09:49 PM | #9 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,443
|
Quote:
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language. Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting |
|
November 12, 2009, 10:17 PM | #10 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 158
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
America has plenty of problems. Don't be a single-issue voter. |
||
November 12, 2009, 10:33 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2008
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 1,527
|
You will often find lead and jacketed data overlap. For instance a start or mild load for jacketed may be a heavy or max load for lead. Like Tuttle said...it is about 10% less for lead as a general rule of thumb.
__________________
~~IllinoisCoyoteHunter~~ ~NRA LIFE MEMBER~ ~NRA CERTIFIED INSTRUCTOR~ |
November 12, 2009, 11:31 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
|
Quote:
If you go with the starting data the worst that will likely happen is massive leading in the bore and/or crap accuracy.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me. |
|
November 13, 2009, 01:23 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2009
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 3,341
|
What about leading?
Aside from how much powder to use (and how much velocity to try for), there is some caution to exercise about leading, especially in Glocks, apparantly because of the type of rifling they use. (Some shooters who reload lead bullets for their Glocks buy aftermarket barrels with standard rifling.)
Anyone with first-hand knowledge want to weigh in here? I don't own or shoot a Glock or anything with polygonal rifling. I have read a few threads on the subject and there is some controversy, with some saying it is fine and others saying it is risky. Good luck and good shooting and don't pinch your fingers in your press. Lost Sheep. |
November 13, 2009, 04:08 PM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: October 29, 2009
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 16
|
What about leading?
I own a Daewoo in 40 S&W (actually a very nice gun!). It has polygonal rifling. When I first got it, I shot some cast lead loads in a match.
Results were HORRIBLE! Lead was plated the length of the barrel. Took a long time to clean even with a Lewis Lead Remover. Now it only sees jacketed or plated bullets. |
November 13, 2009, 05:12 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2008
Location: gulf of mexico
Posts: 2,716
|
if you want expert info on cast boolits go here http://castboolits.gunloads.com/index.php
__________________
There is only one tactical principle which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wound, death, and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time." |
November 13, 2009, 06:43 PM | #16 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
|
There is a trend toward fatter bullets, and hard cast that alleviates much leading problems, but it must be approached on an individual basis with the guns. You people who buy factory lead cartridges may be getting leading because they intentionally undersize. (whoops, who knows?). I bought some PMC factory cowboy loads for my 1895G when I bought it and it left tons of lead in my bore, I hated it. (bought it just for the brass mostly and because I had no reloads yet)
|
November 14, 2009, 03:11 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: October 30, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 20
|
Thanks To All
I'll follow your guidance... Thanks, this is a great site!
|
November 14, 2009, 07:55 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,806
|
Plus, be sure that particular lead bullet will chamber in your gun. Make a dummy round first. I tried to load a TC lead bullet to recommended specs but ended up shortening my OAL quite a bit, and also had to drop my charge as well.
|
November 14, 2009, 07:58 PM | #19 |
Staff
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,443
|
Very good point, Chris.
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language. Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting |
|
|