|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 7, 2014, 11:15 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
wider spreads but tighter groups?
hello all,
I recently switched from an RCBS balance beam scale to a charge master automatic scale/measure combo. I've noticed a strange phenomenon since I made this switch. my standard deviation and extreme spreads have been much larger than with my old setup but my average groups have been much tighter than with my old setup. anyone have similar instances? possible explanations?
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
October 8, 2014, 06:27 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
Are you referring to velocity?
If so, then something else changed. It's not charge weights. You may not be holding the rifle as consistantly against your shoulder. That alone can make a 4X difference in the numbers. |
October 8, 2014, 09:58 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
I chrono from a lead sled. and yes, extreme spreads in velocity, are up, groups are smaller, interestingly enough.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
October 9, 2014, 08:26 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 17, 2009
Posts: 1,089
|
You have just seen why I don't put to much merit in SD and ES figures....
I have noticed the same thing over the decades... in both factory and reloaded ammo. IMHO, there are just to many variables in reloading and shooting for Low ES and SD to have any truly meaningful effect on overall accuracy.... I would think how clean your barrel is would matter more. |
October 9, 2014, 09:35 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Location: southeastern Vermont,USA
Posts: 325
|
what is meant by standard deviation and extreme spreads.if groups are tight than whats the problem.you may mean flyers.so you mean that before you got a flyer every 20th shot but groups were bigger.now you have smaller groups but a flyer every 12th shot.
if this is the case,i mean 2 inch groups at 100 is fine for hunting out to 300 yds and reliability being crucial in the field your old shots may have been more practical. im still not sure what your post means |
October 9, 2014, 04:47 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 963
|
Just a stab in the Dark.. Could you be controlling the runout better now for some strange reason ?
|
October 10, 2014, 09:16 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,876
|
Have you double checked your digital scale to your beam scale or check weights yet . I've seen with my own loads that a .3gr difference does not change much but can just a tad . What does smaller groups mean 2" to 1" / 1" to .5" / .9 to .7 ?? . I would not put to much into ES - SD unless the rifle is locked into a machine rest or let to freely recoil . Any inconsistent hold on the rifle can and will change your ES-SD
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive ! I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again . |
|
|