|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 1, 2013, 09:17 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 1, 2011
Location: Near St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 864
|
Here is what my buddy wrote to his senator and his congressmen... he sent it to me in an email.
Dear Honorable blank I am not a politically oriented person, and other than voting, I have never been involved in politics. However, I will vote against any politician who supports additional gun laws. In fact, I will actively work to defeat them. I will support their opponents with money, and by volunteering my time on their campaigns. I am a single issue voter and guns are my issue. Not saying I agree with his approach, but it is an interesting approach. |
January 1, 2013, 10:18 PM | #27 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Actually, almost every sentence of that letter is poison. The first sentence implies that the writer lacks reach or influence beyond any other person writing. Things like "I supported your campaign back in 2004" are far more effective, as they imply at least minor civic involvement.
Quote:
Quote:
I once worked for a record company. They received demo tapes all day long from striving artists. There was one guy in the office whose job was to listen to them. He popped each tape in, listened for 20 seconds, and if something didn't grab him, the tape got trashed. There's a similar atmosphere in your politician's office. They scan incoming pieces of mail quickly and rarely read past the first two sentences. Mr. Congressdude wants to know how many people support Prop 61 and how many oppose it. It's a head count. Any letter should start with "I support/oppose Prop 61." Sentence 2 should be a list of one or two reasons why, with perhaps two more explanatory sentences. Second paragraph should be conciliatory words of past support and thanks for leadership. Everything else gets ignored for the most part.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
||
January 1, 2013, 10:41 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 1, 2011
Location: Near St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 864
|
Well, he has always been a nut. Would you be surprised to know he has been banned from several forums like this ?
Good shooter, though, and an excellent hunter. He is also a mighty fine gun smith. Anyway I thought his note was interesting, and even a bit entertaining. |
January 3, 2013, 03:45 PM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2000
Location: AZ, WA
Posts: 1,466
|
Here's my effort, FWIW:
Quote:
__________________
Violence is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and valorous feeling which believes that nothing is worth violence is much worse. Those who have nothing for which they are willing to fight; nothing they care about more than their own craven apathy; are miserable creatures who have no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the valor of those better than themselves. Gary L. Griffiths (Paraphrasing John Stuart Mill) |
|
January 3, 2013, 11:06 PM | #30 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
I have received my first reply:
Quote:
|
|
January 3, 2013, 11:25 PM | #31 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2000
Location: AZ, WA
Posts: 1,466
|
From my Senator and Representative:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Violence is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and valorous feeling which believes that nothing is worth violence is much worse. Those who have nothing for which they are willing to fight; nothing they care about more than their own craven apathy; are miserable creatures who have no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the valor of those better than themselves. Gary L. Griffiths (Paraphrasing John Stuart Mill) |
||
January 9, 2013, 12:54 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 28, 2011
Location: Alaska
Posts: 206
|
Response from Senator
I e-mailed my legislators on Monday regarding my opposition to any further gun control, specifically in response to the Sandy Hook incident. I received a detailed response from Democratic Senator Mark Begich's office that included the following information:
"In the aftermath of this awful crime, we must be vigilant about addressing future threats to public safety. There is no simple solution, but I do not believe more restrictive gun laws will prevent criminals from committing acts of violence. I have always been and continue to be a strong defender of Second Amendment rights for law-abiding citizens." He goes on to state that he considers this a mental health problem and has introduced a bill to help colleges recognize signs of mental illness and safety issues. Anybody else know if we have other supporters from across the aisle?
__________________
The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. -James Burgh |
January 16, 2013, 07:09 PM | #33 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
I finally received a response from Senator Risch. Not an email, but an actual hardcopy letter.
Quote:
He left me his fax No. ... heh heh ... I will have another message for him shortly. |
|
January 16, 2013, 07:29 PM | #34 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
From my Rep, Phil Gingrey, via electronic mail: Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
||
January 16, 2013, 08:53 PM | #35 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
Here's what's funny, Tom:
Senator Crapo replied with a thoughtful email. He has a webpage that lists his accomplishments. He sends out a monthly newsletter. You can contact him via email, by phone (in DC or several satellite offices in Idaho). The same with Rep, Simpson. Senator Risch, on the other hand, has little to no info on his .gov site. You may email him from there, but the software vets your physical address (yes, you must give that). His Senate watermarked stationary list his DC office phone and fax numbers and his satellite offices. He sends out a quarterly newsletter that is devoid of any meaningful legislation he has worked on or with. Senator Risch is up for reelection. |
January 16, 2013, 09:20 PM | #36 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
IIRC, Crapo has been quite proactive on the 2A on a couple of occasions.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
January 17, 2013, 01:39 AM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Posts: 686
|
I call and email my reps on most every issue. They work for us and if we don't push them in the right direction then they will do whatever they want.
|
|
|