The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 11, 2012, 08:03 PM   #1
smokiniron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 232
Chromed or 'lined' AR barrels - or not

Last week, the forum offered some good advice on the purchase of a 5.56 Lower for a provisional or future build.

The Smith & Wesson AR15 Sport I previously purchased has a proprietary Melonite lining/coating instead of a chrome liner.

So, on a purchased barrel, what are benefits or a chrome coating? Is it a wear issue, since chrome is harder, or is it resistance to corrosion from rust or powder/primer components? It's not my intent to shoot rounds with corrosive components if I can avoid it.

What advice?
__________________
"Figure Out What You Believe and STAND YOUR GROUND!"
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Lots of Cast Iron to Cook With...
and a few defensive firearms, too!
smokiniron is offline  
Old November 11, 2012, 08:09 PM   #2
ripnbst
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 24, 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 1,552
The melonite is better. The coating is more uniform which means more accuracy. Both extend barrel life.

Not saying chrome can't be accurate, it can be. It's just more difficult to get it right as a mfg.
ripnbst is offline  
Old November 11, 2012, 08:14 PM   #3
Eghad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 28, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,231
Melonite is a form of Nitrocarburizing. It will not be as thick as a chrome lining is since it is on the molecular level instead of a lining.

http://www.burlingtoneng.com/melonite.html

From what I read you better finish machining or drilling on a part before the treatment because the process hardens a part significantly.

I have owned a AR15 without the chrome lining and never had any problems.
__________________
Have a nice day at the range

NRA Life Member
Eghad is offline  
Old November 11, 2012, 09:28 PM   #4
smokiniron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 232
Re Melonite....

So, can you buy a Melonite coated barrel? Or, just Chrome-lined, or bare?
__________________
"Figure Out What You Believe and STAND YOUR GROUND!"
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Lots of Cast Iron to Cook With...
and a few defensive firearms, too!
smokiniron is offline  
Old November 11, 2012, 09:34 PM   #5
RT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 9, 2000
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 2,194
A proper Melonited barrel> Chrome > plain. If you're just plinking, any would be fine.
RT is offline  
Old November 11, 2012, 11:47 PM   #6
smokiniron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 232
Stainless?

Is stainless steel equivalent to some of the aforementioned materials insofar as accuracy and/or durability are concerned?
__________________
"Figure Out What You Believe and STAND YOUR GROUND!"
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Lots of Cast Iron to Cook With...
and a few defensive firearms, too!
smokiniron is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 03:58 AM   #7
Metal god
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,872
I think you need to ask your self this question first . How many rounds do you think you will put down range in the life of the gun . This year alone I've shot 1,500+ rounds of 223/5.56 through 3 ARs . At the rate of 500 rounds a year any barrel will last many years . If you plan on only having 1 AR and shoot as much as I do . I would get a chrome lined barrel . When ever I buy a gun , I plan on keeping it for the life of me then handing it down to my son . I know it's stupid but I don't want him saying , hey I got all my dads guns but there all garbage cus he shot them into the ground . A chrome lined barrel should be good for 25,000+ rounds .A untreated chrome alloy vanadium barrel will shoot 10,000+ rounds . The melonite coated barrels expected life I do not know.

I would consider how many rounds you plan to put through the gun in it's/your life as well as what you plan to use it for .

If you plan on the gun being your HD/plinking gun and you plan to shoot the heck out of it . I recommend a lined/coated bore . If you plan to shoot competition and for accuracy you would not want it chrome lined and most likely stainless chambered in 223 wylde .

Hope this helps , if not never mind
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive !

I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again .

Last edited by Metal god; November 12, 2012 at 09:08 AM.
Metal god is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 07:50 AM   #8
madcratebuilder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
What Metal god said.

Barrel accuracy is more about the quality of machining and barrel profile than any coating done to it.

99% of shooters do not come close to out shooting the barrel they have.
madcratebuilder is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 08:45 AM   #9
Skans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,131
Always go with chrome lining on military style rifles. Round count may be relevant, but not the only thing to consider. If you ever have to actually use your AR for an extended period of time with cheap cruddy ammo, of course you would want a chromed barrel & bore. They don't chrome line AK's (or AR barrels) because it enhances their beauty.
Skans is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 11:21 AM   #10
smokiniron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 232
Barrel selection

I appreciate the last three posts.

My intent is likely in the 1k-2k round count per year. But, since I recently bought an M&P Sport, I'd be spreading that over two guns. Time and budget sadly don't allow more.... And then there is pistol practice, and reloading 30-06 and 30-30, etc, etc!

So, all I really wanted to do is to not short-change myself on barrel selection for a one-time purchase. Like MetalGod said, I want to hand all weapons down to my son and daughters if they want, and not leave them useless weapons.

Stainless sounds good to me, chrome moly vanadium barrel will likely suffice if the cost savings justifies it.
__________________
"Figure Out What You Believe and STAND YOUR GROUND!"
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Lots of Cast Iron to Cook With...
and a few defensive firearms, too!
smokiniron is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 11:52 AM   #11
Sweet Shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2011
Posts: 672
I wouldn't be concerned about round count. It all comes down to heat and how well you look after the barrel. Don't burn it up with rapid fire or over clean it and it will outlast you. If you want "air" your testosterone (which is entirely your prerogative) then buy chromed. Experienced riflemen have ways to tell how a gun has been treated/cared for.

Think of it like a car. I'd rather buy a used car with 60k careful miles on it,—than the same model with 10k reckless miles and a few jumps thrown in for good measure—at the same price point.

-SS-
Sweet Shooter is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 12:41 PM   #12
smokiniron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 232
I wouldn't be concerned about round count. It all comes down to heat and how well you

Makes sense. I will not be shooting larger annual round counts, nor will I be emptying mags quickly. In fact, I bought 20 rd mags for my Sport to lessen the temptation a bit. And, at $0.35 - $0.40 per trigger pull, I'll be firing for accuracy and effect - not to lay down cover in my neighborhood (I hope!).

Any AR I have or will buy will be HD first, range therapy second, and small game hunting last.
__________________
"Figure Out What You Believe and STAND YOUR GROUND!"
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Lots of Cast Iron to Cook With...
and a few defensive firearms, too!
smokiniron is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 01:20 PM   #13
Sweet Shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2011
Posts: 672
Roger that smokiniron. I bought a 5 round Bushmaster mag for the range. I love it's construction quality and it encourages me to get up away from the bench after every group. A scope may increase fire rate at the range as it's easier to get on target.

With irons my shots at 100 yards at the range take forever, as I'm never truly happy with my sight picture. I currently have a scope on it and I have to say it is very pleasing to get into ~one-inch groups. I have the A2 handle in my shooting bag. The A2 handle sight never appears to go out of zero when I remove/replace it.
-SS-
Sweet Shooter is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 02:30 PM   #14
smokiniron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 232
Quote:
I bought a 5 round Bushmaster mag
Good idea... I was looking at 10 rd mags for the same reason, but I think the 5-rd will make me think about the shots more as with my Savage and Marlin rifles. Crossroads of the West gun show this weekend in Salt Lake City! I'm looking for bulk range ammo and maybe a few 5 or 10 rd mags.
__________________
"Figure Out What You Believe and STAND YOUR GROUND!"
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Lots of Cast Iron to Cook With...
and a few defensive firearms, too!
smokiniron is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 02:58 PM   #15
Sweet Shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2011
Posts: 672
Yes the show this weekend will be packed out I reckon. Ammo deals will disappear before 10:00 a.m. so I'm going to get there early. I'm looking for some too.

On that note, have you tried the Fiocchi 55 gr PSP yet? Gallenson's have a 5h1t load of it for 9 bucks and change for 20. I have stock-piled them. In all my guns they have shot around MOA for 10 rounds. In my SIG they shoot groups half the size of the groups PMC Bronze shoots.

-SS-
Sweet Shooter is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 03:04 PM   #16
chris in va
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,804
Since uou already reload, why not 223. Cuts the round cost in half, especially using surplus plinker bullets.
chris in va is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 03:06 PM   #17
smokiniron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 232
FIocchi 55gr...

I'll check them. I work 4 blocks away from Gallensons, and drop by there a few times a month. Good call. I bought some Federal white box 5.56 M193 for $7.99 at Sportsman's Warehouse Sat night. I hear the 5.56/M198 is good for the first 100 rds to break in a new gun.
__________________
"Figure Out What You Believe and STAND YOUR GROUND!"
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Lots of Cast Iron to Cook With...
and a few defensive firearms, too!
smokiniron is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 03:07 PM   #18
smokiniron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 232
Since you already reload, why not 223.

I haven't studied the economics of reloading .223. If it's close to 50%, that makes sense.
__________________
"Figure Out What You Believe and STAND YOUR GROUND!"
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Lots of Cast Iron to Cook With...
and a few defensive firearms, too!
smokiniron is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 07:57 PM   #19
Dfariswheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,476
Here's more on hard chrome lined, stainless, and standard carbon barrels.

Standard carbon steel unlined barrels:
Pro:
High quality barrels MAY BE slightly more accurate then hard chrome lined. This is not always the case and the difference is slight.
They're the cheapest barrels.
May benefit from a break in procedure.

Con:
They rust and corrode if not cared for.
They're the hardest barrels to get clean.
They don't last as long as the others.
Don't get taken by people advertising "Chrome Moly" barrels. Chrome moly is nothing more then ordinary carbon steel used in barrels since the 1930's.
Some sellers leave the impression the bores are lined with chrome by using the "chrome moly" term.

Stainless steel:
Pro:
Very accurate.
Last longer then plain steel, but not as long as chrome lined.
Easier to clean.
Much less likely to rust or corrode.
For these reasons, virtually all Match rifles use stainless barrels.
Break in is much faster then carbon steel.

Con:
More expensive.
Bright finish unless coated or treated to darken it.

Chrome lined:
Pro.:
The most durable. This is the major reason the military will buy only chrome lined barrels.
Very easy to clean. Fouling won't adhere to the "slick" chrome as it does to carbon. Another reason the military buys it.
Highly resistant to rust or corrosion. The second major reason the military only buys chrome lined.
Requires no break in, and in fact, no break in is possible.
Tolerates high heat from rapid fire much better then stainless or plain carbon steel.

Con:
Often not quite as accurate as carbon or stainless. This is only an issue in accuracy Match type barrels where you're trying to get the last bit of accuracy out of the rifle.
In an ordinary rifle the average owner will not be able to detect any difference.
Costs more than carbon.

Bottom line: In a non-Match rifle like a standard AR, given the lifetime of the rifle versus the extra cost for hard chrome, it's sort of silly not to buy hard chrome.
The advantages far out-weight the extra cost.
Dfariswheel is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 08:14 PM   #20
10-96
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 19, 2005
Location: Tx Panhandle Territory
Posts: 4,159
Quote:
I hear the 5.56/M198 is good for the first 100 rds to break in a new gun.
Curious on that. Seems just about anything that squirts a common projectile out the noisey end reliably would work for general rifle break-in. (NO- I'm not about to touch the barrel break-in thing again.) I bought a R-Guns upper some months back, put it on a new Doublestar(?) lower. I ran regular 55gr brass PPU ammo through it. After 40 rounds- it had no sluggishness or short strokes or anything else I might have found objectionable.
__________________
Rednecks... Keeping the woods critter-free since March 2, 1836. (TX Independence Day)

I suspect a thing or two... because I've seen a thing or two.
10-96 is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 10:05 PM   #21
smokiniron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 232
10-96, 5.56 break-in

I heard that the chamber and bolt carrier benefitted from 100 rds of higher pressure ammo. No personal experience, though...
__________________
"Figure Out What You Believe and STAND YOUR GROUND!"
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Lots of Cast Iron to Cook With...
and a few defensive firearms, too!
smokiniron is offline  
Old November 12, 2012, 10:07 PM   #22
smokiniron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 232
DfarisWheel...

Excellent breakdown. Thank you. Your comments as with those of others have been extremely helpful and educational in learning about my new AR Sport, as well as future builds.
__________________
"Figure Out What You Believe and STAND YOUR GROUND!"
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Lots of Cast Iron to Cook With...
and a few defensive firearms, too!
smokiniron is offline  
Old November 13, 2012, 12:31 AM   #23
Eghad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 28, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,231
The primary reason the military went to chrome lining is not to save a GI from having to clean his weapon more often so it wouldn't rust or corrode.. The military weapons were full auto and shooting it that way could wear out a barrel in less time. Chrome lining would extend the barrel life of a military full auto weapon.

If you are a recreational AR-15 shooter who takes good care of his rifle you wouldn't notice any difference for years.
__________________
Have a nice day at the range

NRA Life Member
Eghad is offline  
Old November 13, 2012, 07:45 AM   #24
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,786
If I were putting together a rifle for target shooting or hunting I would not get a chrome lined barrel. But for range plinkng, all around use, or SD use I'd go chrome lined.

I realise I will most likely never actually use the gun for the purpose it was designed. But in the unlikely event it ever has to be used for that purpose, then I want it set up to give me any availible advantage, no matter how small.
jmr40 is offline  
Old November 13, 2012, 08:34 AM   #25
Skans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,131
Quote:
If I were putting together a rifle for target shooting or hunting I would not get a chrome lined barrel.
If I could have a chrome lined barrel on every rifle, carbine and pistol I own, I would. Even my Savage 30-06, which I sometimes hunt with in poor weather, even snow. I'm constantly thinking about how the bore "might" be getting a little rusty.

Yes, I said pistol. I have a Steyr GB which has a chrome barrel and it is extremely accurate. Some folks like stainless - personally,I don't think it is as good as carbon steel with quality hardchrome. The carbon steel is over all harder than stainless, and the hard chrome makes it even that much harder. There's only one reason barrels aren't hard chromed - cost.
Skans is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10472 seconds with 10 queries