|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 14, 2004, 02:00 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 31, 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 254
|
Power Pistol - looking for info on this powder
I'm considering using PowerPistol for .45 Colt loads for use in a lever rifle. I'm NOT looking for maximum power, just moderate power from a clean, easy to use powder which might also be suitable for my .357, .45 acp, and light .44 mag. loads.
I'll probably be looking to load with about 9 to 10 gr. behind a 250 gr. Gold Dot or Hornady XTP bullet for a 16" lever rifle velocity of about 1100 fps. Before I buy some I was wondering if anyone could tell me: 1) Is this a relatively "clean" powder? 2) Does it meter evenly and easily? 3) Any issues or downside to it? The other powder I'm considering is 2400, which I understand is slower and capable of generating greater power if I want it. But I wasn't sure which powder will be cleaner and easier to work with. Since I'm not looking for heavy hunting power and I have a variety of pistols to reload for, it seemed that I might try a somewhat faster powder like PowerPistol. Thanks so much. |
October 15, 2004, 05:20 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
|
Actual
I had excellent results with Power Pistol and Penn Bullets' 270g "Thunderhead" in 45 Colt (Redhawk).
11.0g, CCI300, Starline. I particularly liked its recoil feel. That said, Power Pistol is clean, meters superbly, and offers great accuracy in every cartridge I've tried. My preferred 40 S&W powder, and absolutely the best for +P 45 ACP.
__________________
. "all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo" |
October 15, 2004, 08:33 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 31, 2000
Location: Middle Peninsula, VA
Posts: 1,588
|
I got a pound of it for 9mm and just got around to trying it in +P 38 special and 357 mag. Velocities were very consistent, it was clean and metered well. The only problem was I didn't know about it before! I haven't tried it in the bigger bores but see no reason why it shouldn't be great there too.
|
October 15, 2004, 11:29 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 31, 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 254
|
The feedback I've had elsewhere shows a consensus that it's really clean burning, meters very well, has good accuracy. The only possible downside is that some folks have said that it has quite a bit of white flash. Have you guys noticed a tendency toward more flash?
The other powders I'm looking at for consideration for moderate to punchy loads (along with PowerPistol) are 231, AA#5, and BlueDot. For the heavy .45 Colt and .44 mag. loads I'm looking at 110 and 296. |
October 17, 2004, 07:58 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
|
boomers = H110 / W296 my personal preference remains W296).
mediums = Universal Clays, HS6, and Power Pistol easy-shooters = W231 Power Pistol exhibits more flash than I care for in duty or social ammo, but I consider it within reason and would still use it regardless of its flash signature (rather bright in 40 S&W, not bad in the .355"s, and big-bores all seem to flash, anyways...).
__________________
. "all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo" |
October 23, 2004, 10:54 AM | #6 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 18, 1999
Location: Kokomo, Indiana USA
Posts: 674
|
I just moved to Power Pistol from 296 in .357 mag and 44 mag.
I have been using 296 for years and I love it but the Winchester reloading manual always has ominous warnings about reducing the listed 296 loads and I wanted a powder that I could create lighter loads with in the magnum rounds. In 9mm and 45 ACP Power Pistol works ok but it's very "flashy". I prefer 231 in those calibers. As far as being clean.. It doesn't seem to be any cleaner or dirtier than 296. It's maybe a tad bit cleaner than 231. As far as metering.. it's great. |
October 23, 2004, 03:09 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 1998
Location: riverdale,ut,usa
Posts: 136
|
Z, I also found this powder has a somewhat different burning "rate", i.e. In loading maximum loads for .45 Super in an autoloader I would get buldged cases before attaining a certain velocity. With Powder Pistol I attained and even exceeded that same velocity without buldging cases. Something to due with burning "rate" and early extraction in an autoloader. This is a plus if loading maximum loads in an autoloader. Bob
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|